Christian Jamison R, Gothart Sydney E, Graham Harrison K, Barganier Katelyn D, Whitehead Paul N
Department of Kinesiology, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama.
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Feb 1;37(2):265-269. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004250. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
Christian, JR, Gothart, SE, Graham, HK, Barganier, KD, and Whitehead, PN. Analysis of the activation of upper-extremity muscles during various chest press modalities. J Strength Cond Res 37(2): 265-269, 2023-The most effective way to increase muscular strength is through the implementation of resistance training programs. The purpose of this study was to determine the level of muscle activation of the anterior deltoid (AD), medial deltoid (MD), and pectoralis major (PM) during various bench press scenarios. Twenty subjects (10 male and 10 female subjects; age, 24.0 ± 3.0 years) with a minimum of 1 year of resistance training were recruited to participate. Six surface electromyographical sensors were placed bilaterally on the targeted muscles. Subjects performed a 1 repetition maximum (1RM) of dumbbell (DB) and barbell (BB) flat bench press across 2 sessions followed by 6 repetitions at an incline, flat, and decline position at a submaximal 70% 1RM BB and DB. Mean peak values for muscle activation were analyzed for each variation. A repeated-measures 1-way analysis of variance was used to compare muscle activation patterns across conditions. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Activation of AD was significantly higher during incline BB compared with decline BB and decline DB ( p ≤ 0.019). Activation of MD was significantly lower than that of AD across all modalities ( p ≤ 0.040). Activation of PM was significantly lower during incline DB compared with decline DB ( p = 0.011). Differences among AD and PM may have been the result of the stability stipulation variations between DB or BB and the large biacromial breadth requirement. Lack of differentiation of muscle fibers within the PM during sensor placement could have led to lesser muscle activation recordings during decline. As significance was evident for PM when comparing genders ( p ≤ 0.021), and no significance was found among AD or MD, it can be inferred that the larger amounts of adipose tissue in the female subjects caused irregularities in the PM data.
克里斯蒂安,JR、戈瑟特,SE、格雷厄姆,HK、巴加尼尔,KD和怀特黑德,PN。不同卧推方式下上肢肌肉激活情况分析。《力量与体能研究杂志》37(2): 265 - 269,2023年——增加肌肉力量最有效的方法是实施抗阻训练计划。本研究的目的是确定在各种卧推场景下,前三角肌(AD)、中三角肌(MD)和胸大肌(PM)的肌肉激活水平。招募了20名至少有1年抗阻训练经验的受试者(10名男性和10名女性受试者;年龄,24.0 ± 3.0岁)参与研究。在目标肌肉双侧放置六个表面肌电图传感器。受试者在两个训练 session 中分别进行了一次哑铃(DB)和杠铃(BB)平板卧推的最大重复次数(1RM)测试,随后在次最大重量70% 1RM的BB和DB下,在斜板、平板和下斜位置进行6次重复。分析了每种变化下肌肉激活的平均峰值。采用重复测量单因素方差分析来比较不同条件下的肌肉激活模式。显著性水平设定为p ≤ 0.05。与下斜BB和下斜DB相比,斜板BB期间AD的激活显著更高(p ≤ 0.019)。在所有方式下,MD的激活均显著低于AD(p ≤ 0.040)。与下斜DB相比,斜板DB期间PM的激活显著更低(p = 0.011)。AD和PM之间的差异可能是由于DB或BB之间的稳定性规定差异以及较大的肩峰间宽度要求所致。在传感器放置过程中,PM内肌纤维缺乏分化可能导致在下斜时肌肉激活记录较少。由于在比较性别时PM有显著差异(p ≤ 0.021),而在AD或MD中未发现显著差异,可以推断女性受试者中较多的脂肪组织导致了PM数据的不规则性。