Suppr超能文献

采用哑铃、杠铃和器械模式进行多组卧推和肱三头肌伸展练习时的最大力量表现和肌肉激活情况

Maximal Strength Performance and Muscle Activation for the Bench Press and Triceps Extension Exercises Adopting Dumbbell, Barbell, and Machine Modalities Over Multiple Sets.

作者信息

Farias Déborah de Araújo, Willardson Jeffrey M, Paz Gabriel A, Bezerra Ewertton de S, Miranda Humberto

机构信息

1School of Physical Education and Sports, Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 2Human Performance Laboratory (LEDEHU), Physical Education and Physiotherapy College, Amazonas Federal University, Manaus, Brazil; 3Department of Kinesiology and Sports Studies, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, Illinois; and 4Biomechanics Laboratory, Sports Center (CDS), Santa Catarina Federal University, Florianópolis, Brazil.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jul;31(7):1879-1887. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001651.

Abstract

Farias, DdA, Willardson, JM, Paz, GA, Bezerra, EdS, and Miranda, H. Maximal strength performance and muscle activation for the bench press and triceps extension exercises adopting dumbbell, barbell and machine modalities over multiple sets. J Strength Cond Res 31(7): 1879-1887, 2017-The purpose of this study was to investigate muscle activation, total repetitions, and training volume for 3 bench press (BP) exercise modes (Smith machine [SMBP], barbell [BBP], and dumbbell [DBP]) that were followed by a triceps extension (TE) exercise. Nineteen trained men performed 3 testing protocols in random order, which included: (P1) SMBP + TE; (P2) BBP + TE; and (P3) DBP + TE. Each protocol involved 4 sets with a 10-repetition maximum (RM) load, immediately followed by a TE exercise that was also performed for 4 sets with a 10RM load. A 2-minute rest interval was adopted between sets and exercises. Surface electromyographic activity was assessed for the pectoralis major (PM), anterior deltoid (AD), biceps brachii (BB), and triceps brachii (TB). The results indicated that significantly higher total repetitions were achieved for the DBP (31.2 ± 3.2) vs. the BBP (27.8 ± 4.8). For the TE, significantly greater volume was achieved when this exercise was performed after the BBP (1,204.4 ± 249.4 kg) and DBP (1,216.8 ± 287.5 kg) vs. the SMBP (1,097.5 ± 193 kg). The DBP elicited significantly greater PM activity vs. the BBP. The SMBP elicited significantly greater AD activity vs. the BBP and DBP. During the different BP modes, the SMBP and BBP elicited significantly greater TB activity vs. the DBP. However, the DBP elicited significantly greater BB activity vs. the SMBP and BBP, respectively. During the succeeding TE exercise, significantly greater activity of the TB was observed when this exercise was performed after the BBP vs. the SMBP and DBP. Therefore, it seems that the variation in BP modes does influence both repetition performance and muscle activation patterns during the TE when these exercises are performed in succession.

摘要

法里亚斯,DdA,威拉德森,JM,帕兹,GA,贝泽拉,EdS,以及米兰达,H。采用哑铃、杠铃和器械模式进行多组卧推和肱三头肌伸展练习时的最大力量表现和肌肉激活情况。《力量与体能研究杂志》31(7): 1879 - 1887,2017年——本研究的目的是调查3种卧推(BP)练习模式(史密斯机卧推[SMBP]、杠铃卧推[BBP]和哑铃卧推[DBP])后接肱三头肌伸展(TE)练习时的肌肉激活、总重复次数和训练量。19名受过训练的男性随机进行3种测试方案,包括:(P1)SMBP + TE;(P2)BBP + TE;以及(P3)DBP + TE。每个方案包括4组,每组以10次最大重复量(RM)负荷进行,随后立即进行TE练习,TE练习也进行4组,每组以10RM负荷进行。组间和练习之间采用2分钟的休息间隔。对胸大肌(PM)、三角肌前束(AD)、肱二头肌(BB)和肱三头肌(TB)进行表面肌电图活动评估。结果表明,DBP(31.2±3.2)的总重复次数显著高于BBP(27.8±4.8)。对于TE,在BBP(1204.4±249.4千克)和DBP(1216.8±287.5千克)之后进行该练习时,训练量显著大于在SMBP(1097.5±193千克)之后进行该练习时。与BBP相比,DBP引起的PM活动显著更大。与BBP和DBP相比,SMBP引起的AD活动显著更大。在不同的BP模式中,与DBP相比,SMBP和BBP引起的TB活动显著更大。然而,与SMBP和BBP相比,DBP分别引起的BB活动显著更大。在后续的TE练习中,在BBP之后进行该练习时观察到的TB活动显著大于在SMBP和DBP之后进行该练习时。因此,当这些练习连续进行时,BP模式的变化似乎确实会影响TE期间的重复表现和肌肉激活模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验