Andersen Birgitte Krogsgaard, Ding Daixin, Mogensen Lone Juul Hune, Tu Shengxian, Holm Niels Ramsing, Westra Jelmer, Wijns William
Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 69, 8200 Aarhus, Skejby, Denmark.
Department of Internal Medicine, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2023 Feb 28;9(2):99-108. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac053.
We aimed to investigate the relationship between post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) and clinical outcome using a systematic review with a study-level meta-analysis.
MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were systematically searched for articles with clinical follow-up reporting mean or median final post-PCI FFR. The main outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Meta-regression analyses were performed on mean post-PCI FFR values. A total of 62 studies with 12 340 patients and 12 923 stented vessels were included, with follow-ups ranging from 1 to 89 months. Post-PCI FFR was not continuously associated with the rate of 1-year MACE or 1-year TVR using meta-regression models accounting for heterogeneous follow-up lengths. For studies comparing high vs. low post-PCI FFR, low post-PCI FFR was associated with high risk ratio for MACE {1.97 [95% confidence interval (CI):1.45-2.67]}, all-cause death [1.59 (95% CI: 1.08-2.34)], MI [3.18 (95% CI: 1.84-5.50)], TVR [2.08 (95% CI: 1.63-2.65)] and angina status [2.50 (95% CI: 1.53-4.06)] using different optimal cut-off values spanning from 0.80 to 0.95.
We found no clear continuous association between post-PCI FFR and clinical outcomes in this systematic study-level meta-analysis. In a subset of studies investigating binary classification, high post-PCI FFR was associated with a better clinical outcome than low post-PCI FFR.We investigated the relationship between post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) and rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR), using a systematic review and study-level meta-analysis, pooling 12 340 patients from 62 studies. Mean post-PCI FFR was not continuously associated with a 1-year MACE rate accounting for heterogenous follow-up lengths. Still, the risk ratio favoured high post-PCI FFR for reduced MACE, all-cause death, MI, TVR, and better angina status using different cut-offs.
我们旨在通过系统评价和研究水平的荟萃分析来研究经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后血流储备分数(FFR)与临床结局之间的关系。
系统检索MEDLINE、Embase和CENTRAL数据库,查找报告PCI术后最终平均或中位数FFR的临床随访文章。主要结局是主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的复合终点,包括全因死亡、心肌梗死(MI)和靶血管血运重建(TVR)。对PCI术后FFR均值进行荟萃回归分析。共纳入62项研究,涉及12340例患者和12923条置入支架的血管,随访时间为1至89个月。使用考虑随访时间长度异质性的荟萃回归模型,PCI术后FFR与1年MACE发生率或1年TVR发生率无连续相关性。对于比较PCI术后高FFR与低FFR的研究,使用不同的最佳截断值(范围为0.80至0.95),低PCI术后FFR与MACE的高风险比相关{1.97[95%置信区间(CI):1.45 - 2.67]},全因死亡[1.59(95%CI:1.08 - 2.34)],MI[3.18(95%CI:1.84 - 5.50)],TVR[2.08(95%CI:1.63 - 2.65)]和心绞痛状态[2.50(95%CI:1.53 - 4.06)]。
在这项系统的研究水平荟萃分析中,我们发现PCI术后FFR与临床结局之间无明确的连续相关性。在一部分进行二元分类研究的子集中,PCI术后高FFR与比低FFR更好的临床结局相关。我们通过系统评价和研究水平的荟萃分析,汇总了62项研究中的12340例患者,研究经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后血流储备分数(FFR)与主要不良心脏事件(MACE)发生率之间的关系,MACE包括全因死亡、心肌梗死(MI)和靶血管血运重建(TVR)。考虑随访时间长度异质性时,PCI术后平均FFR与1年MACE发生率无连续相关性。不过,使用不同截断值时,PCI术后高FFR在降低MACE、全因死亡、MI、TVR以及改善心绞痛状态方面的风险比更有利。