Comparison of keratometry using SS-OCT and dual Scheimpflug-Placido imaging in postmyopic corneal refractive surgery eyes.

PURPOSE

To compare simulated (SimK) and total (True-K) keratometry and corneal astigmatism values between the IOLMaster 700 (IOLM) and Galilei G4 (G4) devices in postmyopic laser refractive surgery eyes.

SETTING

Methodist Eye Associates, Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

A chart review was conducted on patients with prior myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), undergoing phacoemulsification at a single institution from May 2019 through January 2022, who underwent imaging with both the IOLM and G4. Exclusion criteria were prior radial keratotomy, keratoectatic diseases, and inability to obtain a reliable image. Mean, flat, and steep SimK and True-K (TK from the IOLM and TCP IOL from the G4) values and astigmatism magnitude were compared.

RESULTS

50 eyes of 50 patients were included. The mean difference in SimK and True-K between devices (IOLM - G4) was -0.04 (95% CI -0.13 to 0.06; P > .05) diopters (D) and 1.14 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.25; P < .05) D, respectively. The IOLM measured steeper True-K values than the G4. There were no statistically significant differences between devices for all other SimK values, whereas for True-K there were significant differences in flat K and steep K ( P < .05), but not astigmatism magnitude.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an overall good correlation in postmyopic laser refractive surgery eyes in keratometry and astigmatism measurements, there is a significant difference in True-K, with the IOLM measuring steeper values by about 1.0 D compared with the G4, similar to prior studies on nonrefractive surgery eyes.