• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调强放射治疗老年食管癌患者:我们的经验。

Intensity modulated radiation therapy for elderly patients with esophageal cancer: Our experience.

机构信息

Department of radiation oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Biomol Biomed. 2023 Mar 16;23(2):327-334. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2022.7835.

DOI:10.17305/bjbms.2022.7835
PMID:36032036
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10113949/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to discuss the treatment mode of radical radiotherapy for elderly patients with esophageal cancer. The clinical data of 136 elderly patients (≥60 years old) with esophageal cancer (EC) who received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from January 2015 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Cox risk model was used for multivariate prognostic analysis, and Kaplan Meier method was used to calculate progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox regression analysis showed that ECOG score, basic diseases, T stage, radiation dose, radiation injury and chemotherapy were the prognostic factors of elderly patients. The median OS of the radiotherapy group, concurrent chemoradiotherapy group and sequential chemoradiotherapy group were 17, 41 and 10 months (p=0.009), respectively. The 3-year OS and PFS of concurrent intravenous chemotherapy and oral chemotherapy were 50%, 42.9% and 34.1%, 28.6% (p=0.641, p=0.702), respectively. The median OS of IFI and ENI were 23 and 24 months (p=0.219) and the local recurrence rate were 59.8% and 43.2% (p=0.069), respectively, but the incidence and mortality of radiation pneumonia and esophagitis in ENI were higher. The 3-year OS and PFS the low-dose group (≤60Gy) and high-dose group (>60Gy) were 19.1%, 40.4% and 14.9%, 29.2% (p=0.012, p=0.049), respectively. In conclusion, for elderly patients with inoperable EC, radical chemoradiotherapy should be considered a preferable selection. Among them, oral drugs and high-dose involved field irradiation exhibited better curative effects and safety.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨老年食管癌患者根治性放疗的治疗模式。回顾性分析 2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月在西安交通大学第二附属医院接受根治性调强放疗的 136 例老年食管癌(EC)患者的临床资料。采用 Cox 风险模型进行多因素预后分析,Kaplan-Meier 法计算无进展生存(PFS)和总生存(OS)。Cox 回归分析显示,ECOG 评分、基础疾病、T 分期、放疗剂量、放疗损伤和化疗是老年患者的预后因素。放疗组、同期放化疗组和序贯放化疗组的中位 OS 分别为 17、41 和 10 个月(p=0.009)。同期静脉化疗与口服化疗的 3 年 OS 和 PFS 分别为 50%、42.9%和 34.1%、28.6%(p=0.641,p=0.702)。IFI 和 ENI 的中位 OS 分别为 23 和 24 个月(p=0.219),局部复发率分别为 59.8%和 43.2%(p=0.069),但 ENI 的放射性肺炎和食管炎发生率和死亡率较高。低剂量组(≤60Gy)和高剂量组(>60Gy)的 3 年 OS 和 PFS 分别为 19.1%、40.4%和 14.9%、29.2%(p=0.012,p=0.049)。综上所述,对于不能手术的老年 EC 患者,根治性放化疗应作为首选。其中,口服药物和高剂量累及野照射具有更好的疗效和安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543f/10113949/9dcf3458607b/bjbms-2022-7835f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543f/10113949/83b128ba36bc/bjbms-2022-7835f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543f/10113949/9dcf3458607b/bjbms-2022-7835f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543f/10113949/83b128ba36bc/bjbms-2022-7835f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543f/10113949/9dcf3458607b/bjbms-2022-7835f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Intensity modulated radiation therapy for elderly patients with esophageal cancer: Our experience.调强放射治疗老年食管癌患者:我们的经验。
Biomol Biomed. 2023 Mar 16;23(2):327-334. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2022.7835.
2
[Clinical outcomes of different irradiation ranges in definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy for esophageal cancer].[食管癌根治性调强放疗中不同照射范围的临床疗效]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 23;42(12):1040-1047. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20191225-00842.
3
Salvage treatment for lymph node recurrence after radical resection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.根治性切除术后淋巴结复发的挽救性治疗。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Sep 18;14(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1377-y.
4
Survival analysis of 80 elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1.80 例老年食管鳞癌患者接受 S-1 根治性同期放化疗的生存分析
Cancer Radiother. 2022 Nov;26(8):1064-1069. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.04.007. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
5
The efficacy and safety of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Chinese population: A single institution experience.同步整合加量调强放疗在中国人群中治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效与安全性:单机构经验
J Cancer Res Ther. 2016 Oct;12(Supplement):82-88. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.191640.
6
Elective nodal irradiation versus involved-field irradiation for stage II-IV cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective propensity study with 8-year survival outcomes.根治性同期放化疗治疗 II-IV 期颈段食管鳞癌患者选择性淋巴结照射与累及野照射:一项回顾性倾向评分研究及 8 年生存结果。
Radiat Oncol. 2023 Aug 28;18(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02332-2.
7
Feasibility of Elective Nodal Irradiation (ENI) and Involved Field Irradiation (IFI) in Radiotherapy for the Elderly Patients (Aged ≥ 70 Years) with Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Institute.选择性淋巴结照射(ENI)与累及野照射(IFI)用于老年(≥70岁)食管鳞状细胞癌患者放疗的可行性:来自单中心的回顾性分析
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 4;10(12):e0143007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143007. eCollection 2015.
8
Patterns of failure after involved field radiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌累及野放疗后的失败模式
J BUON. 2016 Sept-Oct;21(5):1268-1273.
9
A comparative study of elective nodal irradiation and involved field irradiation in elderly patients with advanced esophageal cancer.老年晚期食管癌患者选择性淋巴结照射与累及野照射的比较研究。
Front Oncol. 2023 Dec 20;13:1323908. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1323908. eCollection 2023.
10
Intensity-modulated versus 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in the definitive treatment of esophageal cancer: comparison of outcomes and acute toxicity.调强放疗与三维适形放疗在食管癌根治性治疗中的比较:疗效与急性毒性对比
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Aug 15;12(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0863-3.

本文引用的文献

1
The Global Landscape of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Incidence and Mortality in 2020 and Projections to 2040: New Estimates From GLOBOCAN 2020.2020年食管鳞状细胞癌和食管腺癌发病率及死亡率的全球格局以及至2040年的预测:来自GLOBOCAN 2020的新估计
Gastroenterology. 2022 Sep;163(3):649-658.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.05.054. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
2
Parallel-Group Controlled Trial of Surgery Versus Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Stage I Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Ⅰ 期食管鳞癌手术与放化疗的平行对照临床试验
Gastroenterology. 2021 Dec;161(6):1878-1886.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
3
Efficacy of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With S-1 vs Radiotherapy Alone for Older Patients With Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trial.
替吉奥胶囊同步放化疗对比单纯放疗治疗老年食管癌患者的疗效:一项多中心随机 3 期临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Oct 1;7(10):1459-1466. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2705.
4
Involved-Field Irradiation in Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Locoregional Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Results From the ESO-Shanghai 1 Trial.局部区域食管鳞癌根治性放化疗中的累及野照射:来自 ESO-Shanghai 1 试验的结果。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Aug 1;110(5):1396-1406. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.053. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
5
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
S-1-Based Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy With S-1 in Elderly Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Phase II Trial.老年食管鳞状细胞癌患者采用基于S-1的同步放化疗后序贯S-1巩固化疗:一项多中心II期试验
Front Oncol. 2020 Aug 28;10:1499. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01499. eCollection 2020.
7
Global burden of oesophageal and gastric cancer by histology and subsite in 2018.2018 年按组织学和部位划分的全球食管和胃癌负担。
Gut. 2020 Sep;69(9):1564-1571. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321600. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
8
Clinical outcomes of oesophagectomy in elderly versus relatively younger patients: a meta-analysis.老年患者与相对年轻患者食管癌切除术的临床结局:一项荟萃分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Dec 1;29(6):897-905. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz208.
9
Comparing Paclitaxel Plus Fluorouracil Versus Cisplatin Plus Fluorouracil in Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Clinical Trial.紫杉醇联合氟尿嘧啶对比顺铂联合氟尿嘧啶用于局部晚期食管鳞癌放化疗的随机、多中心、III 期临床研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul 10;37(20):1695-1703. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02122. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
10
Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy alone for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: 10-year survival outcomes.单纯三维适形放疗治疗食管鳞癌:10 年生存结果。
Thorac Cancer. 2019 Mar;10(3):519-525. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12968. Epub 2019 Jan 16.