Adebowale Oluwawemimo, Oduguwa Adebankemo, Dipeolu Saheed, Agbaje Michael, Fasanmi Olubumni, Fasina Folorunso Oludayo
Department of Veterinary Public Health and Reproduction, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Appl Biosaf. 2020 Dec 1;25(4):232-239. doi: 10.1177/1535676020930130.
Because of the nature of work conducted in veterinary laboratories and potential exposures to pathogenic microorganisms, good laboratory practices, risk assessments, biosafety, and biosecurity capacity is becoming vital. In this study, the Food and Agriculture Organization Laboratory Mapping Tool-Safety Module was applied to demonstrate its practical implementation in the assessment of biosafety and biosecurity statuses of veterinary laboratories in Nigeria.
The Laboratory Mapping Tool-Safety Module, a standardized questionnaire, systematically and semiquantitatively gathered data on 98 subcategories covering 4 areas of biosafety and biosecurity capabilities: administrative, operational, engineering, and personal protective equipment.
Overall, the various areas and categories covered by the Laboratory Mapping Tool-Safety Module were weak across the board, with a mean performance of 19.5% (95% confidence interval, 14.0%-25.1%; range, 0.8%-29.6%). The weakest functionality was in emergency preparedness (0.8%; ie, emergency responses and exercises such as fire drills, spill cleanup, and biological spill kit availability). Also, many laboratories were deficient in metrology procedures, biosafety cabinets, chemical hazard containment, regular maintenance and external calibration procedures for laboratory equipment, and personnel health and safety. However, a few functionalities within individual laboratories scored above average (50%), for example, a university microbiology laboratory animal facility (100%). Interlaboratory comparison indicated that biosafety and biosecurity performance was similar across laboratories ( = .07) and did not vary by location ( = .37).
Significant biosafety and biosecurity improvements are needed to guarantee the health and safety of workers and the global community, efficient responses to infectious disease containment, and compliance with the Global Health Security Agenda.
由于兽医实验室所开展工作的性质以及可能接触致病微生物,良好的实验室规范、风险评估、生物安全和生物安保能力变得至关重要。在本研究中,应用了粮农组织实验室绘图工具-安全模块来展示其在评估尼日利亚兽医实验室生物安全和生物安保状况中的实际应用。
实验室绘图工具-安全模块是一份标准化问卷,系统且半定量地收集了涵盖生物安全和生物安保能力4个领域的98个子类别的数据:行政、操作、工程和个人防护设备。
总体而言,实验室绘图工具-安全模块所涵盖的各个领域和类别普遍薄弱,平均表现为19.5%(95%置信区间,14.0%-25.1%;范围,0.8%-29.6%)。最薄弱的功能是应急准备(0.8%;即应急响应和演练,如消防演习、溢出物清理以及生物溢出物处理套件的可用性)。此外,许多实验室在计量程序、生物安全柜、化学危害控制、实验室设备的定期维护和外部校准程序以及人员健康和安全方面存在不足。然而,个别实验室的一些功能得分高于平均水平(50%),例如一所大学微生物学实验室动物设施(100%)。实验室间比较表明,各实验室的生物安全和生物安保表现相似( = 0.07),且不因地点而异( = 0.37)。
需要大幅改进生物安全和生物安保,以保障工作人员和全球社区的健康与安全、有效应对传染病防控以及遵守全球卫生安全议程。