Desai Killol N, Bhatt Parth S, Maru Alpesh Kumar, Shaik Riyaz Ahamed
Department of Pathology, Nootan Medical College and Research Centre, Visnagar, Gujarat, India.
Department of Pathology, Dr N D Desai Faculty of Medical Science and Research, Nadiad, India.
Maedica (Bucur). 2022 Jun;17(2):387-394. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2022.17.2.387.
Blood transfusion services is the important part of the modern healthcare system without which efficient medical care is not possible. Blood bank quality audits become an important assessment tool to check the efficiency of the quality system in terms of realization of quality policy, fulfilment of designed targets and implementation of quality system documents. To study the utility of vertical quality audits as a quality improvement tool, to compare vertical and horizontal audits and explore the differences between them. The study duration was three years and two months, from November 2018 to December 2021. We conducted an observational prospective study of vertical and horizontal quality audits in a transfusion centre of our tertiary care hospital as per ISO 9001:2000 and National Accreditation Board for Hospitals & Healthcare Providers (NABH) guideline. The most common non-conformities in vertical audit were related to documentation (80%). The donor area was the most common area of blood bank from where non-conformities were observed in vertical audit (60%). The most commonly observed non-conformities in horizontal audit were related to procedural or technical aspects (42.8%). The donor area was the most common area of blood bank from where non-conformities were observed in horizontal audit (57.14%). Quality audits verify compliance and therefore, they are driving continuous quality improvement in a blood bank. Vertical audit is a retrospective process and helps to identify near miss events and errors performed by blood bank staff. Horizontal audits are cumbersome to conduct as compared to vertical audits.
输血服务是现代医疗体系的重要组成部分,没有它就不可能提供高效的医疗服务。血库质量审核成为一项重要的评估工具,用于检查质量体系在质量方针的落实、既定目标的达成以及质量体系文件的执行方面的效率。为研究纵向质量审核作为质量改进工具的效用,比较纵向审核与横向审核并探究它们之间的差异。研究持续时间为三年零两个月,从2018年11月至2021年12月。我们按照ISO 9001:2000和医院及医疗服务提供者国家认证委员会(NABH)的指南,在我们三级医院的一个输血中心对纵向和横向质量审核进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。纵向审核中最常见的不符合项与文件记录有关(80%)。献血者区域是血库中纵向审核发现不符合项最常见的区域(60%)。横向审核中最常观察到的不符合项与程序或技术方面有关(42.8%)。献血者区域是血库中横向审核发现不符合项最常见的区域(57.14%)。质量审核验证合规情况,因此,它们推动血库持续质量改进。纵向审核是一个回顾性过程,有助于识别血库工作人员发生的未遂事件和错误。与纵向审核相比,横向审核实施起来较为繁琐。