Xue Hanbing, Luo Yifei, Luan Yuxiang, Wang Nan
School of Labor and Human Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
School of Business, North Minzu University, Yinchuan, China.
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 12;13:941161. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941161. eCollection 2022.
This paper provides the first meta-analytic examination of the relationship between leadership and followers' intrinsic motivation. In particular, we examined 6 leadership variables (transformational, ethical, leader-member exchange, servant, empowering, and abusive supervision) using data from 50 independent samples and 21,873 participants. We found that transformational leadership, ethical leadership, leader-member exchange (LMX), servant leadership, and empowering leadership were positively related to intrinsic motivation, whereas abusive supervision was negatively linked to intrinsic motivation. Although these leadership styles were associated with intrinsic motivation, they varied considerably in their relative importance. Empowering, ethical, and servant leadership emerged as the more important contributors to intrinsic motivation than transformational leadership. LMX showed a similar contribution with transformational leadership to intrinsic motivation. Effectiveness of leadership styles in relation to intrinsic motivation varied by power distance, publication year, and journal quality. Drawing on our findings, we discuss the theoretical and practice implications.
本文首次对领导力与追随者内在动机之间的关系进行了元分析研究。具体而言,我们使用来自50个独立样本和21873名参与者的数据,考察了6种领导变量(变革型领导、道德领导、领导-成员交换、仆人式领导、赋权型领导和 abusive监督)。我们发现,变革型领导、道德领导、领导-成员交换(LMX)、仆人式领导和赋权型领导与内在动机呈正相关,而abusive监督与内在动机呈负相关。尽管这些领导风格与内在动机相关,但它们的相对重要性差异很大。赋权型领导、道德领导和仆人式领导对内在动机的贡献比变革型领导更为重要。LMX对内在动机的贡献与变革型领导相似。领导风格与内在动机的有效性因权力距离、出版年份和期刊质量而异。基于我们的研究结果,我们讨论了理论和实践意义。