• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多团队系统处理时间敏感目标:在分布式和同地协作环境中培养态势感知能力。

Multiteam Systems Handling Time-Sensitive Targets: Developing Situation Awareness in Distributed and Co-located Settings.

作者信息

Hærem Thorvald, Valaker Sigmund, Lofquist Eric Arne, Bakken Bjørn Tallak

机构信息

Department of Organisation, Inland School of Business and Social Sciences, Rena, Norway.

Defence Systems, Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, Kjeller, Norway.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 4;13:864749. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.864749. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.864749
PMID:36033093
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9406507/
Abstract

There is an increasing interest in how to organize operations carried out by multiteam systems (MTS). Large MTS typically operate with a dedicated integration team, responsible for coordinating the operation. We report a study of a military multiteam system that prosecute time-sensitive targets. We asked whether and how the integration team's efficiency depends on its communication setting. Specifically, we studied how a co-located vs. a distributed communications setting influenced the shared situation awareness and whether the shared situation awareness again influenced the outcome of the decision processes. We found that performance fell when the integration team shifted from a co-located to a distributed setting. The fall in performance seemed to be mediated by a corresponding fall in situation awareness. Moreover, while the performance improved for each run in the co-located setting, we did not see such learning in the distributed setting. Qualitative observations revealed that misunderstandings lasted longer in a distributed configuration than in a co-located setting. We found that situation awareness at level 3 was the only level of situation awareness significant for predicting all dimensions of performance. Implications for theory, research, and practice are discussed.

摘要

人们对如何组织多团队系统(MTS)开展的行动越来越感兴趣。大型多团队系统通常由一个专门的整合团队运作,该团队负责协调行动。我们报告了一项对执行时间敏感任务的军事多团队系统的研究。我们探讨了整合团队的效率是否以及如何取决于其通信设置。具体而言,我们研究了同地办公与分布式通信设置如何影响共享态势感知,以及共享态势感知是否又会影响决策过程的结果。我们发现,当整合团队从同地办公模式转变为分布式模式时,绩效会下降。绩效的下降似乎是由态势感知的相应下降所介导的。此外,虽然在同地办公模式下每次运行的绩效都有所提高,但在分布式模式下我们并未看到这种学习效果。定性观察表明,在分布式配置中误解持续的时间比在同地办公模式下更长。我们发现,3级态势感知是唯一对预测绩效的所有维度都具有显著意义的态势感知水平。本文讨论了对理论、研究和实践的启示。

相似文献

1
Multiteam Systems Handling Time-Sensitive Targets: Developing Situation Awareness in Distributed and Co-located Settings.多团队系统处理时间敏感目标:在分布式和同地协作环境中培养态势感知能力。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 4;13:864749. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.864749. eCollection 2022.
2
Measuring team situation awareness in decentralized command and control environments.在分散式指挥与控制环境中测量团队态势感知。
Ergonomics. 2006;49(12-13):1312-25. doi: 10.1080/00140130600612788.
3
Examining Multiteam Systems Across Context and Type: A Historiometric Analysis of Failed MTS Performance.跨情境与类型审视多团队系统:对失败的多团队系统绩效的历史计量分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 10;13:813624. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813624. eCollection 2022.
4
Teamwork in multiteam systems.多团队系统中的团队合作。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Sep;90(5):964-71. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.964.
5
Building shared situational awareness in surgery through distributed dialog.通过分布式对话在手术中建立共享态势感知。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2013 Mar 20;6:109-18. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S40710. Print 2013.
6
Leveraging Team Expertise Location Awareness in Improving Team Improvisation: A Dynamic Knowledge Integration Perspective.利用团队专业知识位置感知来改善团队即兴发挥:一种动态知识整合视角
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Dec 19;14:2135-2146. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S341685. eCollection 2021.
7
Charting a course for collaboration: a multiteam perspective.绘制协作蓝图:多团队视角。
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Dec;2(4):487-94. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0170-3.
8
The dynamics of coordination patterns in multiteam systems response to emergency: Case study from a pharmaceutical enterprise.多团队系统应对突发事件时协调模式的动态变化:来自一家制药企业的案例研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 29;13:957531. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.957531. eCollection 2022.
9
Evaluating the use of multiteam systems to manage the complexity of inpatient falls in rural hospitals.评估多团队系统在管理农村医院住院患者跌倒复杂性中的应用。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):994-1006. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13186. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
10
Measuring situation awareness and team effectiveness in pediatric acute care by using the situation global assessment technique.使用态势感知全局评估技术测量儿科急症护理中的态势感知和团队效能。
Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Jun;178(6):837-850. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03358-z. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Information sharing in interteam responses to disaster.团队间灾害应对中的信息共享。
J Occup Organ Psychol. 2018 Sep;91(3):591-619. doi: 10.1111/joop.12217. Epub 2018 Apr 1.
2
Clinical mentoring to improve quality of care provided at three NIM-ART facilities: A mixed methods study.通过临床指导提高三家NIM-ART机构的护理质量:一项混合方法研究。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2018 Jun 14;10(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1579.
3
Coordinated action in multiteam systems.多团队系统中的协调行动。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Jul;97(4):808-24. doi: 10.1037/a0026682. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
4
Perspective: teams won't solve this problem.观点:团队无法解决这个问题。
Hum Factors. 2010 Apr;52(2):329-34. doi: 10.1177/0018720810374736.
5
Errors in the heat of battle: taking a closer look at shared cognition breakdowns through teamwork.战斗激烈时的失误:通过团队合作深入审视共享认知的崩溃
Hum Factors. 2007 Apr;49(2):243-56. doi: 10.1518/001872007X312478.
6
Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model.理解团队适应性:概念分析与模型
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(6):1189-207. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1189.
7
On error management: lessons from aviation.论错误管理:来自航空领域的经验教训。
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):781-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.781.