Suppr超能文献

在肩袖损伤随机对照试验中,患者报告结局测量指标的报告情况不理想,需要标准化。

Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Randomized Controlled Trials on Shoulder Rotator Cuff Injuries Is Suboptimal and Requires Standardization.

作者信息

Brock Lydia, Hightower Brooke, Moore Ty, Nees Danya, Heigle Benjamin, Shepard Samuel, Kee Micah, Ottwell Ryan, Hartwell Micah, Vassar Matt

机构信息

Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences Tulsa, Oklahoma, U.S.A.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Oklahoma, School of Community Medicine Tulsa, Oklahoma, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Jul 15;4(4):e1429-e1436. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.032. eCollection 2022 Aug.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the completeness of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) reporting using Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Patient-Reported Outcome (CONSORT-PRO) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving rotator cuff injuries.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for published RCTs focused on rotator cuff injuries that included at least one PRO measure. We included RCTs published from 2006 to 2020. Investigators extracted data from RCTs using the CONSORT-PRO and evaluated each RCT using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Our primary objective was to evaluate the mean completion percentage of CONSORT-PRO. Our secondary objective used bivariate regression analyses to explore the relationship between trial characteristics and completeness of reporting.

RESULTS

The initial search returned 467 results, with 33 published RCTs meeting the prespecified inclusion criteria. The mean CONSORT-PRO completeness across all included RCTs was 49.7% (standard deviation 15.43). An increase in sample size was associated with an increase in mean completeness of reporting (t = 2.31;  = .028). The Risk of Bias assessment found 29 (of 33, 87.88%) RCTs had "some concerns" for bias. We did not find any additional significant associations between completeness of reporting and trial characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Randomized controlled trials involving rotator cuff injuries frequently use PRO measures as primary outcomes. Reporting of these PRO measures is suboptimal and may benefit from rigorous standardization.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

PRO measures are increasingly incorporated as primary or secondary outcomes of RCTs. Appropriate reporting and use of state-of-the-art PRO measures may improve the dissemination of clinical knowledge from RCTs to guide treatment and determine intervention effectiveness. With increased adoption of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System and adherence to CONSORT-PRO, orthopaedic literature may improve PRO reporting to optimize the interpretability of PROs and facilitate patient-centered care.

摘要

目的

使用随机对照试验(RCT)中报告试验患者报告结局的统一标准(CONSORT-PRO)来评估涉及肩袖损伤的随机对照试验中患者报告结局(PRO)报告的完整性。

方法

我们对MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库进行了全面检索,以查找聚焦于肩袖损伤且至少包含一项PRO测量指标的已发表RCT。我们纳入了2006年至2020年发表的RCT。研究人员使用CONSORT-PRO从RCT中提取数据,并使用Cochrane偏倚风险2.0工具对每个RCT进行评估。我们的主要目标是评估CONSORT-PRO的平均完成百分比。我们的次要目标是使用双变量回归分析来探讨试验特征与报告完整性之间的关系。

结果

初始检索返回467条结果,其中33项已发表的RCT符合预先设定的纳入标准。所有纳入的RCT中CONSORT-PRO的平均完整性为49.7%(标准差15.43)。样本量的增加与报告平均完整性的增加相关(t = 2.31;P = 0.028)。偏倚风险评估发现33项RCT中有29项(87.88%)存在“一些偏倚问题”。我们未发现报告完整性与试验特征之间存在任何其他显著关联。

结论

涉及肩袖损伤的随机对照试验经常将PRO测量指标用作主要结局。这些PRO测量指标的报告并不理想,可能需要严格的标准化。

临床意义

PRO测量指标越来越多地被纳入RCT的主要或次要结局。适当报告和使用最先进的PRO测量指标可能会改善从RCT传播临床知识以指导治疗并确定干预效果。随着患者报告结局测量信息系统的采用增加以及对CONSORT-PRO的遵守,骨科文献可能会改善PRO报告,以优化PRO的可解释性并促进以患者为中心的护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7ef/9402470/fbb2a0f2a975/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验