Suppr超能文献

重症监护幸存者的重症监护后表现筛查(PICUPS)和康复处方(RP) 第一部分:开发与初步临床测量学评估

The post-ICU presentation screen (PICUPS) and rehabilitation prescription (RP) for intensive care survivors part I: Development and preliminary clinimetric evaluation.

作者信息

Turner-Stokes Lynne, Corner Evelyn J, Siegert Richard J, Brown Craig, Wallace Sarah, Highfield Julie, Bear Danielle, Aitken Leanne M, Montgomery Hugh, Puthucheary Zudin

机构信息

Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute. Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.

UK Rehabilitation Outcomes Collaborative, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

J Intensive Care Soc. 2022 Aug;23(3):253-263. doi: 10.1177/1751143720988715. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients who have had prolonged stays in intensive care have ongoing rehabilitation needs. This is especially true of COVID-19 ICU patients, who can suffer diverse long-term ill effects. Currently there is no systematic data collection to guide the needs for therapy input for either of these groups nor to inform planning and development of rehabilitation services. These issues could be resolved in part by the systematic use of a clinical tool to support decision-making as patients progress from the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), through acute hospital care and onwards into rehabilitation. We describe (i) the development of such a tool (the Post-ICU Presentation Screen (PICUPS)) and (ii) the subsequent preparation of a person-centred Rehabilitation Prescription (RP) to travel with the patient as they continue down the care pathway.

METHODS

PICUPS development was led by a core group of experienced clinicians representing the various disciplines involved in post-ICU rehabilitation. Key constructs and item-level descriptors were identified by group consensus. Piloting was performed as part of wider clinical engagement in 26 acute hospitals across England. Development and validation of such a tool requires clinimetric analysis, and this was based on classical test theory. Teams also provided feedback about the feasibility and utility of the tool.

RESULTS

Initial PICUPS design yielded a 24-item tool. In piloting, a total of 552 records were collated from 314 patients, of which 121 (38.5%) had COVID-19. No obvious floor or ceiling effects were apparent. Exploratory factor analysis provided evidence of uni-dimensionality with strong loading on the first principal component accounting for 51% of the variance and Cronbach's alpha for the full-scale score 0.95 - although a 3-factor solution accounted for a further 21%. The PICUPS was responsive to change both at full scale- and item-level. In general, positive responses were seen regarding the tool's ability to describe the patients during their clinical course, engage and flag the relevant professionals needed, and to inform what should be included in an RP.

CONCLUSIONS

The PICUPS tool has robust scaling properties as a clinical measure and is potentially useful as a tool for identifying rehabilitation needs as patients step down from ICU and acute hospital care.

摘要

背景

在重症监护室长期住院的患者有持续的康复需求。对于新冠重症监护病房患者而言尤其如此,他们可能会遭受各种长期不良影响。目前,尚无系统的数据收集来指导这两类患者的治疗投入需求,也无法为康复服务的规划和发展提供信息。通过系统使用临床工具来支持患者从重症监护病房(ICU)过渡到急性医院护理并继续进入康复阶段的决策过程,这些问题可以部分得到解决。我们描述了(i)这样一种工具(ICU后表现筛查表(PICUPS))的开发过程,以及(ii)随后制定以患者为中心的康复处方(RP),以便在患者继续沿着护理路径前行时随其一同使用。

方法

PICUPS的开发由一组经验丰富的临床医生核心团队牵头,他们代表了参与ICU后康复的各个学科。关键结构和项目级描述符通过团队共识确定。在英格兰26家急性医院更广泛的临床参与过程中进行了试点。开发和验证这样一种工具需要进行临床计量分析,这是基于经典测试理论进行的。各团队还提供了关于该工具可行性和实用性的反馈。

结果

最初的PICUPS设计产生了一个包含24个项目的工具。在试点过程中,共整理了来自314名患者的552份记录,其中121名(38.5%)患有新冠。未发现明显的地板效应或天花板效应。探索性因素分析提供了单维度性的证据,第一个主成分上的强负荷占方差的51%,全量表得分的克朗巴哈系数为0.95——尽管三因素解决方案又占了21%。PICUPS在全量表和项目层面都对变化有反应。总体而言,对于该工具描述患者临床过程、吸引并标记所需相关专业人员以及告知康复处方应包含内容的能力,得到了积极反馈。

结论

PICUPS工具作为一种临床测量工具具有强大的量表特性,并且在识别患者从ICU和急性医院护理过渡时的康复需求方面可能很有用。

相似文献

4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
3
Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: Physical Impairments and Function.重症监护后综合征:身体损伤与功能障碍
Crit Care Clin. 2025 Jan;41(1):1-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2024.08.004. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
8
Critical care and pandemic preparedness and response.重症监护和大流行防范与应对。
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Nov;131(5):847-860. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.07.026. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
10
Therapy professionals in critical care: A UK wide workforce survey.重症监护治疗专业人员:全英国劳动力调查
J Intensive Care Soc. 2023 Feb;24(1):24-31. doi: 10.1177/17511437221100332. Epub 2022 May 9.

本文引用的文献

5
9
Clinimetric perspectives.
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(6):635-40. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90027-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验