• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞联合碘-125粒子植入治疗非小细胞肺癌肝转移患者

CalliSpheres microsphere transarterial chemoembolization combined with I brachytherapy for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer liver metastases.

作者信息

Zhao Guangsheng, Liu Song, Liu Ying, Li Xiang, Yu Guangji, Zhang Yuewei, Bian Jie, Wu Jianlin, Zhou Jun, Gao Fei

机构信息

Cancer Interventional Center, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China.

Cancer Interventional Center, Linyi Cancer Hospital, Linyi, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 12;12:882061. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.882061. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.882061
PMID:36033546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9413194/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Poor prognosis and limited treatments of liver metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after radical surgery are critical issues. The current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres microsphere transarterial chemoembolization (CSM-TACE) plus I brachytherapy in these patients.

METHODS

A total of 23 patients with liver metastases from NSCLC after radical surgery were included. All patients received CSM-TACE 1-3 times, then I brachytherapy was carried out following the last CSM-TACE. Complete response (CR), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), survival, and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

CR, ORR and DCR were 43.5%, 87.0%, and 100%, respectively, at three months; furthermore, they were 78.3%, 100%, and 100% accordingly at six months. Moreover, most European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) subscales of functions (including physical and emotional function) and symptoms (including pain, nausea, and vomiting) were generally improved at three months (all < 0.05). Furthermore, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.4-17.6] months, with a 1-year PFS rate of 62.9%, but the 2-year PFS rate was not reached. Moreover, the median overall survival (OS) was 22.0 (95% CI: 16.8-27.2) months, with a 1-year OS rate of 91.3% and a 2-year OS rate of 43.5%. Additionally, the main adverse events included fever (100%), pain (65.2%), liver function impairment (65.2%), fatigue (56.5%), and nausea and vomiting (52.2%), which were all categorized as grade 1-2.

CONCLUSION

CSM-TACE plus I brachytherapy is effective and safe in patients with liver metastases from NSCLC after radical surgery, providing a potentially optimal option in these patients.

摘要

目的

非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)根治性手术后肝转移的预后较差且治疗方法有限,这是关键问题。本研究旨在评估载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术(CSM-TACE)联合碘125粒子植入术对这些患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

纳入23例NSCLC根治性手术后发生肝转移的患者。所有患者接受1-3次CSM-TACE治疗,在最后一次CSM-TACE治疗后进行碘125粒子植入术。评估完全缓解(CR)、客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、生存率和不良事件。

结果

三个月时CR、ORR和DCR分别为43.5%、87.0%和100%;六个月时相应为78.3%、100%和100%。此外,大多数欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心问卷30(QLQ-C30)功能子量表(包括身体和情感功能)和症状子量表(包括疼痛、恶心和呕吐)在三个月时总体有所改善(均P<0.05)。此外,中位无进展生存期(PFS)为14.0[95%置信区间(CI):10.4-17.6]个月,1年PFS率为62.9%,但2年PFS率未达到。中位总生存期(OS)为22.0(95%CI:16.8-27.2)个月,1年OS率为91.3%,2年OS率为43.5%。此外,主要不良事件包括发热(100%)、疼痛(65.2%)、肝功能损害(65.2%)、疲劳(56.5%)以及恶心和呕吐(52.2%),均为1-2级。

结论

CSM-TACE联合碘125粒子植入术对NSCLC根治性手术后肝转移患者有效且安全,为这些患者提供了一种潜在的最佳选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f9/9413194/29f9aa4278c2/fonc-12-882061-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f9/9413194/4061d0ab9468/fonc-12-882061-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f9/9413194/29f9aa4278c2/fonc-12-882061-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f9/9413194/4061d0ab9468/fonc-12-882061-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f9/9413194/29f9aa4278c2/fonc-12-882061-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
CalliSpheres microsphere transarterial chemoembolization combined with I brachytherapy for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer liver metastases.载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞联合碘-125粒子植入治疗非小细胞肺癌肝转移患者
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 12;12:882061. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.882061. eCollection 2022.
2
Irinotecan eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization using Callispheres® microspheres is an effective and safe approach in treating unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术(使用 Callispheres®微球)是治疗不可切除结直肠癌肝转移的一种有效且安全的方法。
Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Jun;191(3):1139-1145. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02629-9. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
3
Treatment Response, Survival, and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization With CalliSpheres Microspheres Versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌的疗效、生存率及安全性:一项荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 16;11:576232. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.576232. eCollection 2021.
4
Comparison of chemoembolization with CalliSpheres microspheres and conventional chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.载药微球化疗栓塞与传统化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的疗效比较:一项多中心回顾性研究
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Feb 10;12:941-956. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S187203. eCollection 2020.
5
Efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres® Microspheres in head and neck cancer.使用载药微球(CalliSpheres®)经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗头颈癌的疗效与安全性
Front Surg. 2022 Aug 25;9:938305. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.938305. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparison of treatment efficacy and safety between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres microspheres and conventional transarterial chemoembolization as first-line treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.载药微球(CalliSpheres)经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术作为肝细胞癌患者一线治疗的疗效与安全性比较
Am J Transl Res. 2019 Dec 15;11(12):7456-7470. eCollection 2019.
7
Comparison of Treatment Response, Survival Profiles, as Well as Safety Profiles Between CalliSpheres Microsphere Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma.CalliSpheres微球经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗巨大肝细胞癌的疗效、生存情况及安全性比较
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 21;11:793581. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.793581. eCollection 2021.
8
An investigation of efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors of drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization operation with CalliSpheres Microspheres in treating Chinese hepatocellular carcinoma patients.载药微球动脉化疗栓塞术治疗中国肝细胞肝癌患者的疗效、安全性及预后因素的研究。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Oct;33(8):e22975. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22975. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
9
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres® microsphere-transarterial chemoembolization in large hepatocellular carcinoma.评价 CalliSpheres®载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞治疗大肝癌的疗效和安全性。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2023 Dec 1;19(6):1575-1581. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_218_23. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
10
Comparison of treatment response, survival and safety between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres® microspheres versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in treating hepatocellular carcinoma.载药微球(CalliSpheres®)经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌的疗效、生存率及安全性比较
J BUON. 2019 May-Jun;24(3):1150-1166.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent progress in radioactive seed implantation brachytherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review.非小细胞肺癌放射性粒子植入近距离治疗的最新进展:一项叙述性综述
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Mar 29;16(3):2167-2176. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1600. Epub 2024 Mar 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Irinotecan eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization using Callispheres® microspheres is an effective and safe approach in treating unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术(使用 Callispheres®微球)是治疗不可切除结直肠癌肝转移的一种有效且安全的方法。
Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Jun;191(3):1139-1145. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02629-9. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
2
Assessment of efficacy and safety by CalliSpheres versus HepaSpheres for drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization in unresectable large hepatocellular carcinoma patients.评估 CalliSpheres 与 HepaSpheres 在不可切除的大肝癌患者的载药微球动脉化疗栓塞术中的疗效和安全性。
Drug Deliv. 2021 Dec;28(1):1356-1362. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2021.1943057.
3
Radioactive I seed implantation for pancreatic cancer with unexpected liver metastasis: A preliminary experience with 26 patients.放射性碘籽源植入治疗意外发生肝转移的胰腺癌:26例患者的初步经验
World J Clin Cases. 2021 Feb 6;9(4):792-800. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i4.792.
4
Liver metastasis restrains immunotherapy efficacy via macrophage-mediated T cell elimination.肝转移通过巨噬细胞介导的 T 细胞消除来抑制免疫疗法的疗效。
Nat Med. 2021 Jan;27(1):152-164. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1131-x. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
5
Dosimetric differences between cesium-131 and iodine-125 brachytherapy for the treatment of resected brain metastases.铯-131与碘-125近距离放射治疗切除的脑转移瘤的剂量学差异。
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2020 Aug;12(4):311-316. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2020.98109. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
6
Update 2020: Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.更新于 2020 年:非小细胞肺癌的治疗。
Lung. 2020 Dec;198(6):897-907. doi: 10.1007/s00408-020-00407-5. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
7
Lung cancer in China: current and prospect.中国肺癌:现状与展望。
Curr Opin Oncol. 2021 Jan;33(1):40-46. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000703.
8
Evaluation of radioactive I seed implantation for the treatment of refractory malignant tumours based on a CT-guided 3D template-assisted technique: efficacy and safety.基于 CT 引导的 3D 模板辅助技术的放射性碘 125 种子植入治疗难治性恶性肿瘤的疗效和安全性评估。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 3;20(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07223-3.
9
Comparative Study of Drug-eluting Beads versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization for Treating Peculiar Anatomical Sites of Gastric Cancer Liver Metastasis.药物洗脱微球与常规经动脉化疗栓塞治疗特殊解剖部位胃癌肝转移的对比研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 May 31;26:e922988. doi: 10.12659/MSM.922988.
10
Comparison of chemoembolization with CalliSpheres microspheres and conventional chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.载药微球化疗栓塞与传统化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的疗效比较:一项多中心回顾性研究
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Feb 10;12:941-956. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S187203. eCollection 2020.