• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌的疗效、生存率及安全性:一项荟萃分析

Treatment Response, Survival, and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization With CalliSpheres Microspheres Versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Liang Bin, Makamure Joyman, Shu Shenglei, Zhang Lijie, Sun Tao, Zheng Chuansheng

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 16;11:576232. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.576232. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2021.576232
PMID:33796448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8008112/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug-eluting embolic transarterial chemoembolization (DEE-TACE) is an advance in TACE technique. However, at present there is insufficient evidence to support that DEE-TACE is superior to conventional TACE (cTACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE with CalliSpheres microspheres (CSM-TACE) compared with cTACE in patients with HCC.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI and Wanfang Databases were searched to identify relevant articles published before March 26, 2020. The data regarding treatment response, survival profile, adverse events and liver function indexes were retrieved.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies with 1454 HCC patients (722 treated with CSM-TACE and 732 with cTACE) were included. Patients receiving CSM-TACE had higher 1-month complete response (CR), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) (odds ratio (OR): 2.00, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.29-3.09; OR: 2.87, 95% CI: 2.15-3.83; OR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.37-2.95, respectively), 3-month CR, ORR, DCR (OR: 4.04, 95%CI: 2.46-6.64; OR: 3.39, 95%CI: 2.45-4.70; OR: 1.71, 95%CI: 1.14-2.55 respectively), and 6-month CR, ORR, DCR (OR: 4.02, 95%CI: 2.26-7.16; OR: 3.00, 95%CI: 2.05-4.38; OR: 2.66, 95%CI: 1.70-4.16 respectively) than those treated with cTACE. Furthermore, CSM-TACE exhibited a trend toward improved progression free survival (hazard ratio (HR): 0.86, 95%CI: 0.67-1.11) and overall survival (HR: 0.79, 95%CI: 0.59-1.07) over cTACE although these differences did not reach statistical significance. In terms of safety, the two TACE treatments showed similar post-treatment pain (OR: 0.84, 95%CI: 0.55-1.28), fever (OR: 0.99, 95%CI: 0.60-1.63), nausea/vomiting (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.60-1.17), as well as 1-month follow-up alanine aminotransferase (Mean difference (MD): -3.66, 95%CI: -10.38-3.07), aspartate aminotransferase (MD: -2.30, 95%CI: -8.91-4.31) and total bilirubin (MD: -0.15, 95%CI: -2.26-1.96).

CONCLUSION

CSM-TACE displays superior treatment response, non-inferior survival profile and safety over cTACE in HCC patients.

摘要

背景

载药栓塞经动脉化疗栓塞术(DEE-TACE)是经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)技术的一项进展。然而,目前尚无充分证据支持DEE-TACE在肝细胞癌(HCC)治疗中优于传统TACE(cTACE)。本荟萃分析的目的是评估与cTACE相比,使用载药微球的TACE(CSM-TACE)治疗HCC患者的疗效和安全性。

数据来源

检索了PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、中国知网和万方数据库,以识别2020年3月26日前发表的相关文章。检索了有关治疗反应、生存情况、不良事件和肝功能指标的数据。

结果

共纳入16项研究,涉及1454例HCC患者(722例接受CSM-TACE治疗,732例接受cTACE治疗)。与接受cTACE治疗的患者相比,接受CSM-TACE治疗的患者在1个月时的完全缓解(CR)、客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)更高(优势比(OR)分别为:2.00,95%置信区间(95%CI):1.29 - 3.09;OR:2.87,95%CI:2.15 - 3.83;OR:2.01,95%CI:1.37 - 2.95),3个月时的CR、ORR、DCR更高(OR分别为:4.04,95%CI:2.46 - 6.64;OR:3.39,95%CI:2.45 - 4.70;OR:1.71,95%CI:1.14 - 2.55),6个月时的CR、ORR、DCR更高(OR分别为:4.02,95%CI:2.26 - 7.16;OR:3.00,95%CI:2.05 - 4.38;OR:2.66,95%CI:1.70 - 4.16)。此外,与cTACE相比,CSM-TACE在无进展生存期(风险比(HR):0.86,95%CI:0.67 - 1.11)和总生存期(HR:0.79,95%CI:0.59 - 1.07)方面有改善趋势,尽管这些差异未达到统计学意义。在安全性方面,两种TACE治疗在治疗后疼痛(OR:0.84,95%CI:0.55 - 1.28)、发热(OR:0.99,95%CI:0.60 - 1.63)、恶心/呕吐(OR:0.84,95%CI:0.60 - 1.17)以及1个月随访时的丙氨酸氨基转移酶(平均差(MD): - 3.66,95%CI: - 10.38 - 3.07)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(MD: - 2.30,95%CI: - 8.91 - 4.31)和总胆红素(MD: - 0.15,95%CI: - 2.26 - 1.96)方面表现相似。

结论

在HCC患者中,CSM-TACE相较于cTACE显示出更好的治疗反应、非劣效的生存情况和安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae5/8008112/26e8e914e328/fonc-11-576232-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae5/8008112/a42b25ff8e0f/fonc-11-576232-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae5/8008112/016c792d49ba/fonc-11-576232-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae5/8008112/3e7c81a64ad7/fonc-11-576232-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae5/8008112/ec0373927dcf/fonc-11-576232-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae5/8008112/1ba50232187b/fonc-11-576232-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae5/8008112/b8e6ea902d16/fonc-11-576232-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae5/8008112/915cc6ec9051/fonc-11-576232-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae5/8008112/7579264a41eb/fonc-11-576232-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae5/8008112/26e8e914e328/fonc-11-576232-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae5/8008112/a42b25ff8e0f/fonc-11-576232-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae5/8008112/016c792d49ba/fonc-11-576232-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae5/8008112/3e7c81a64ad7/fonc-11-576232-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae5/8008112/ec0373927dcf/fonc-11-576232-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae5/8008112/1ba50232187b/fonc-11-576232-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae5/8008112/b8e6ea902d16/fonc-11-576232-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae5/8008112/915cc6ec9051/fonc-11-576232-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae5/8008112/7579264a41eb/fonc-11-576232-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae5/8008112/26e8e914e328/fonc-11-576232-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Treatment Response, Survival, and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization With CalliSpheres Microspheres Versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌的疗效、生存率及安全性:一项荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 16;11:576232. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.576232. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparison of chemoembolization with CalliSpheres microspheres and conventional chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.载药微球化疗栓塞与传统化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的疗效比较:一项多中心回顾性研究
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Feb 10;12:941-956. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S187203. eCollection 2020.
3
Comparison of treatment efficacy and safety between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres microspheres and conventional transarterial chemoembolization as first-line treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.载药微球(CalliSpheres)经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术作为肝细胞癌患者一线治疗的疗效与安全性比较
Am J Transl Res. 2019 Dec 15;11(12):7456-7470. eCollection 2019.
4
Comparison of treatment response, survival and safety between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres® microspheres versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in treating hepatocellular carcinoma.载药微球(CalliSpheres®)经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌的疗效、生存率及安全性比较
J BUON. 2019 May-Jun;24(3):1150-1166.
5
Comparison of CalliSpheres microspheres drug-eluting beads and conventional transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a randomized controlled trial.载药微球与常规 TACE 治疗肝细胞癌的随机对照研究
Radiol Oncol. 2023 Feb 17;57(1):70-79. doi: 10.2478/raon-2023-0001. eCollection 2023 Mar 1.
6
Comparison of Treatment Response, Survival Profiles, as Well as Safety Profiles Between CalliSpheres Microsphere Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma.CalliSpheres微球经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗巨大肝细胞癌的疗效、生存情况及安全性比较
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 21;11:793581. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.793581. eCollection 2021.
7
Comprehensive predictive factors for CalliSpheres® microspheres (CSM) drug-eluting bead-transarterial chemoembolization and conventional transarterial chemoembolization on treatment response and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.载药微球栓塞化疗与常规肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌疗效及生存的综合预测因素
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2021 Mar;45(2):101460. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
8
CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads versus lipiodol transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a short-term efficacy and safety study.载药微球与碘化油动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的短期疗效及安全性比较:一项短期疗效和安全性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar 27;16(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1368-8.
9
Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) exhibits superior efficacy and equal tolerance to conventional TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with conventional TACE history.对于有传统经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)治疗史的肝细胞癌患者,载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)显示出比传统TACE更好的疗效和相同的耐受性。
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar;46(3):101814. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2021.101814. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
10
Comparison of liver function and safety in hepatocellular cancer patients treated with DEB-TACE and cTACE: a multi-center, retrospective cohort study.经动脉化疗栓塞术(DEB-TACE)与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术(cTACE)治疗肝细胞癌患者的肝功能及安全性比较:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Sep;8(5):1950-1964. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.09.15.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative literature analysis on efficacy and safety of balloon-occluded transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌疗效与安全性的定量文献分析
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 4;25(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03851-w.
2
Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization vs conventional transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in adult patients: a systematic review and update meta-analysis of observational studies.药物洗脱微球经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗成年肝细胞癌的比较:观察性研究的系统评价与更新的荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2025 Feb 12;14:1526268. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1526268. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of chemoembolization with CalliSpheres microspheres and conventional chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.载药微球化疗栓塞与传统化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的疗效比较:一项多中心回顾性研究
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Feb 10;12:941-956. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S187203. eCollection 2020.
2
Arsenic trioxide-eluting Callispheres beads is more effective and equally tolerant compared with arsenic trioxide/lipiodol emulsion in the transcatheter arterial chemoembolization treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients.三氧化二砷洗脱微球与三氧化二砷/碘油乳剂相比,在不可切除肝癌患者的经导管动脉化疗栓塞治疗中更有效且耐受性相当。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Feb;24(3):1468-1480. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202002_20206.
3
Clinical research progress of callisperes of drug-loaded microsphere arterial chemoembolisation in the treatment of solid tumors.
载药微球动脉化疗栓塞术治疗实体瘤的临床研究进展
Discov Oncol. 2024 May 13;15(1):161. doi: 10.1007/s12672-024-01030-z.
4
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults.英国胃肠病学会成人肝细胞癌管理指南。
Gut. 2024 Jul 11;73(8):1235-1268. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331695.
5
Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer (2022 Edition).原发性肝癌诊疗指南(2022年版)
Liver Cancer. 2023 Apr 5;12(5):405-444. doi: 10.1159/000530495. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Efficacy of CalliSpheres® microspheres versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of refractory colorectal cancer liver metastasis.CalliSpheres® 微球与常规经动脉化疗栓塞治疗难治性结直肠癌肝转移的疗效比较。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Oct 12;23(1):970. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11350-y.
7
Comparison of CalliSpheres microspheres drug-eluting beads and conventional transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a randomized controlled trial.载药微球与常规 TACE 治疗肝细胞癌的随机对照研究
Radiol Oncol. 2023 Feb 17;57(1):70-79. doi: 10.2478/raon-2023-0001. eCollection 2023 Mar 1.
8
The impact of drug-eluting bead (vs. conventional) transarterial chemoembolization on hepatic fibrosis in treating intermediate or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.药物洗脱微球(与常规相比)经动脉化疗栓塞治疗中晚期肝细胞癌对肝纤维化的影响。
Cancer Biol Ther. 2023 Dec 31;24(1):2166335. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2023.2166335.
9
Clinical practice guidelines and real-life practice in hepatocellular carcinoma: A Chinese perspective.肝细胞癌的临床实践指南和实际实践:中国视角。
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2023 Apr;29(2):206-216. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0402. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
10
Conventional and drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and pooled analysis.不可切除性肝内胆管癌患者的传统与载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术:一项系统评价与汇总分析
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan;149(1):531-540. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04485-1. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
Comparison of treatment efficacy and safety between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres microspheres and conventional transarterial chemoembolization as first-line treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.载药微球(CalliSpheres)经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术作为肝细胞癌患者一线治疗的疗效与安全性比较
Am J Transl Res. 2019 Dec 15;11(12):7456-7470. eCollection 2019.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization by CalliSpheres in 275 Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: Results From the Chinese CalliSpheres Transarterial Chemoembolization in Liver Cancer (CTILC) Study.载药微球动脉化疗栓塞术治疗 275 例肝癌患者的疗效和安全性:来自中国载药微球肝癌化疗栓塞术(CTILC)研究的结果。
Oncol Res. 2020 Feb 7;28(1):75-94. doi: 10.3727/096504019X15662966719585. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
5
Comparison of treatment response, survival and safety between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres® microspheres versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in treating hepatocellular carcinoma.载药微球(CalliSpheres®)经动脉化疗栓塞术与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌的疗效、生存率及安全性比较
J BUON. 2019 May-Jun;24(3):1150-1166.
6
evaluation of callispheres microspheres in the porcine renal artery embolization model.在猪肾动脉栓塞模型中对Callispheres微球的评估。
Am J Transl Res. 2019 Jul 15;11(7):4166-4179. eCollection 2019.
7
[Comparative effect of CalliSpheres drug loading microspheres and lipiodol transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of huge primary liver cancer].[载药微球与碘化油经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗巨大原发性肝癌的对比研究]
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 20;27(6):460-462. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2019.06.014.
8
An investigation of efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors of drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization operation with CalliSpheres Microspheres in treating Chinese hepatocellular carcinoma patients.载药微球动脉化疗栓塞术治疗中国肝细胞肝癌患者的疗效、安全性及预后因素的研究。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Oct;33(8):e22975. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22975. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
9
Safety and efficacy assessment of transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting beads in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and arterioportal shunt: a single-center experience.使用载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌合并动门脉分流患者的安全性和疗效评估:单中心经验
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Feb 15;11:1551-1557. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S193948. eCollection 2019.
10
CalliSpheres Drug-Eluting Bead Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Presents With Better Efficacy and Equal Safety Compared to Conventional TACE in Treating Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术相比,载药微球经导管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌患者疗效更佳且安全性相当。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan 1;18:1533033819830751. doi: 10.1177/1533033819830751.