Suppr超能文献

哪一种?传统校服和运动服对青少年学业成绩、认知表现、游戏时间、欺凌和歧视影响的比较研究:Cogni-Action 项目。

Which one? A comparative study of traditional and sports uniforms on academic achievement, cognitive performance, playtime, bullying, and discrimination in adolescents: The Cogni-Action Project.

机构信息

IRyS Group, Physical Education School, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.

Department of Physical and Sports Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, PROFITH "PROmoting FITness and Health Through Physical Activity" Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 12;10:917970. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.917970. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare academic achievement, cognitive performance, playtime, bullying, and discrimination in adolescents according to traditional uniforms (TUs) and sports uniforms (SUs) worn at school, while simultaneously exploring the influence of the school vulnerability index.

METHODS

A total of 988 Chilean adolescents (52.6% boys) aged 10-14 years participated in this cross-sectional study. Academic achievement was evaluated by the average grade in maths, language, and science grades, while cognitive performance was assessed through eight cognitive tasks. TUs affecting physical activity, playtime, bullying, and discrimination were queried. Mixed model analyses were performed.

RESULTS

No differences were observed in academic achievement (TU: 5.4 ± 0.1 vs. SU: 5.5 ± 0.2, p = 0.785) or in cognitive performance (TU: 99.6 ± 0.8 vs. SU: 98.9 ± 1.8, p= 0.754) according to the school uniformtype. Moreover, 64.1 % of participants declared that wearing TU affects their physical activity (traditional uniforms: + 8 min and sports uniforms: + 20 min), and those who believed so spent more time playing than those who answered negatively (14.5 min, p = 0.012). Finally, adolescents wearing SU displayed a lower feeling of bullying and discrimination; this finding depended mainly on the school's vulnerability.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that wearing TU does not show an educational advantage at an academic and cognitive level that justifies its obligation. In addition, it could be suggested that schools consider adolescents' opinions in adopting a more comfortable uniform, such as the SU. This feasible and low-cost measure would help to increase adolescents' physical activity during the school day, and, contrary to belief, it would not be related to increased feelings of bullying and discrimination.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较穿着传统校服(TU)和运动校服(SU)的青少年的学业成绩、认知表现、游戏时间、欺凌和歧视情况,并同时探讨学校脆弱性指数的影响。

方法

共有 988 名智利青少年(52.6%为男生)参与了这项横断面研究,年龄在 10-14 岁之间。学业成绩通过数学、语言和科学成绩的平均成绩进行评估,认知表现通过八项认知任务进行评估。调查了影响身体活动、游戏时间、欺凌和歧视的 TU。采用混合模型分析。

结果

根据校服类型,学业成绩(TU:5.4±0.1 与 SU:5.5±0.2,p=0.785)或认知表现(TU:99.6±0.8 与 SU:98.9±1.8,p=0.754)均无差异。此外,64.1%的参与者表示穿着 TU 会影响他们的身体活动(传统校服:+8 分钟,运动校服:+20 分钟),并且那些认为如此的人比那些回答否定的人花更多的时间玩耍(14.5 分钟,p=0.012)。最后,穿着 SU 的青少年表现出较低的欺凌和歧视感;这一发现主要取决于学校的脆弱性。

结论

我们得出的结论是,穿着 TU 在学术和认知层面上并没有表现出教育优势,这并不能证明其强制性的合理性。此外,我们可以建议学校考虑青少年的意见,采用更舒适的校服,例如 SU。这种可行且低成本的措施将有助于增加青少年在学校期间的身体活动,而且与人们的看法相反,它不会与欺凌和歧视感的增加有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90a9/9411804/329d0759fe41/fpubh-10-917970-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验