Department of Psychology, Kingston University London, Penrhyn Road, Kingston upon Thames KT1 2EE, UK.
Department of Psychology, Brunel University London, London UB8 3PH, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 24;18(5):2209. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052209.
Bullying involvement may have an adverse effect on children's educational outcomes, particularly academic achievement. However, the underlying mechanisms and factors behind this association are not well-understood. Previous meta-analyses have not investigated mediation factors between bullying and academic achievement. This meta-analysis examines the mediation effect of cognitive-motivational factors on the relationship between peer victimization and academic achievement. A systematic search was performed using specific search terms and search engines to identify relevant studies that were selected according to specific criteria resulting in 11 studies encompassing a sample total of 257,247 children (10 years and younger) and adolescents (11 years and older) (48-59% female). Some studies were longitudinal and some cross sectional and the assessment for each factor was performed by various methods (self, peer, teacher, school and mixed reports). Children involved in bullying behaviour were less likely to be academically engaged (k = 4) (OR = 0.571, 95% CI [0.43, 0.77], = 0.000), to be less motivated (k = 7) (OR = 0.82, 95% CI [0.69, 0.97], = 0.021), to have lower self-esteem (k = 1) (OR = 0.12, 95% CI [0.07, 0.20], = 0.000) and lower academic achievement (k = 14) (OR = 0.62, 95% CI [0.49, 0.79], = 0.000). Bullying involvement was also significantly related to overall cognitive-motivational factors (k = 17, OR = 0.67, 95% CI [0.59, 0.76], = 0.000). Cognitive-motivational factors, taken together, mediated the association between bullying victimisation and academic achievement (k = 8, OR = 0.74, 95% CI (0.72, 0.77), = 0.000). Bullying victimisation was negatively related to cognitive-motivational factors, which, in turn, was associated with poorer academic achievement. These findings were moderated by the design of the studies, assessment methods for the bullying reports, mediators and outcomes, country, age of children in the sample and/or types of bullying. The findings are of relevance for practitioners, parents, and schools, and can be used to guide bullying interventions. Interventions should focus on improving internal and external motivational factors including components of positive reinforcement, encouragement, and programs for enhancing academic engagement and achievement amongst children and adolescents.
欺凌行为可能会对儿童的教育成果产生不良影响,尤其是学业成绩。然而,这种关联背后的潜在机制和因素还不是很清楚。之前的荟萃分析没有研究欺凌与学业成绩之间的中介因素。本荟萃分析考察了同伴受害与学业成绩之间的关系中认知-动机因素的中介效应。使用特定的搜索词和搜索引擎进行了系统搜索,以确定符合特定标准的相关研究,这些标准导致 11 项研究共纳入了 257247 名儿童(10 岁及以下)和青少年(11 岁及以上)(48-59%为女性)。一些研究是纵向的,一些是横向的,对每个因素的评估都是通过各种方法(自我、同伴、教师、学校和混合报告)进行的。参与欺凌行为的儿童不太可能在学业上投入(k = 4)(OR = 0.571,95% CI [0.43,0.77], = 0.000),不太有动力(k = 7)(OR = 0.82,95% CI [0.69,0.97], = 0.021),自尊心较低(k = 1)(OR = 0.12,95% CI [0.07,0.20], = 0.000),学业成绩较低(k = 14)(OR = 0.62,95% CI [0.49,0.79], = 0.000)。欺凌行为也与整体认知-动机因素显著相关(k = 17,OR = 0.67,95% CI [0.59,0.76], = 0.000)。认知-动机因素综合起来,中介了欺凌受害与学业成绩之间的关联(k = 8,OR = 0.74,95% CI [0.72,0.77], = 0.000)。欺凌受害与认知-动机因素呈负相关,而认知-动机因素又与较差的学业成绩有关。这些发现受到研究设计、欺凌报告的评估方法、中介因素和结果、国家、样本中儿童的年龄以及/或欺凌类型的调节。这些发现与从业者、家长和学校有关,可以用于指导欺凌干预。干预措施应侧重于改善内部和外部动机因素,包括积极强化、鼓励和提高儿童和青少年学业参与和成就的计划的组成部分。