Suppr超能文献

通过水、卫生和个人卫生措施防控2019冠状病毒病:快速综述

WASH to control COVID-19: A rapid review.

作者信息

Khatib Mahalaqua Nazli, Sinha Anju, Mishra Gaurav, Quazi Syed Ziauddin, Gaidhane Shilpa, Saxena Deepak, Gaidhane Abhay M, Bhardwaj Pankaj, Sawleshwarkar Shailendra, Zahiruddin Quazi Syed

机构信息

Division of Evidence Synthesis, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, India.

Division of Reproductive, Maternal and Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research Headquarters, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 11;10:976423. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.976423. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preventive public health has been suggested as methods for reducing the transmission of COVID-19. Safety and efficacy of one such public health measure: WASH intervention for COVID-19 has not been systematically reviewed. We undertook a rapid review to assess the effect of WASH intervention in reducing the incidence of COVID-19.

METHODS

We conducted searches in PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. We undertook screening of studies in two stages and extracted data and assessed the quality of evidence for the primary outcome using GRADE recommendations.

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 13 studies with three studies on COVID-19 and 10 on SARS. The study found that hand washing, sterilization of hands, gargling, cleaning/shower after attending patients of COVID-19, or SARS was protective. Evidence also found that frequent washes can prevent SARS transmission among HCWs. However; one study reported that due to enhanced infection-prevention measures, front-line HCWs are more prone to hand-skin damage. The certainty of the evidence for our primary outcome as per GRADE was very low. We did not find any studies that assessed the effect of WASH on hospitalizations, and mortality due to COVID-19. Also; we did not find any study that compared WASH interventions with any other public health measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence of WASH interventions for COVID-19 is limited as it is largely based on indirect evidence from SARS. Findings from the included studies consistently show that WASH is important in reducing the number of cases during a pandemic. Timely implementation of WASH along with other public health interventions can be vital to ensure the desired success. Further good-quality studies providing direct evidence of the efficacy of WASH on COVID-19 are needed.

摘要

背景

预防性公共卫生措施被认为是减少新冠病毒传播的方法。一种此类公共卫生措施——针对新冠病毒的洗消干预措施的安全性和有效性尚未得到系统评价。我们进行了一项快速综述,以评估洗消干预措施在降低新冠病毒发病率方面的效果。

方法

我们在PubMed、MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库中进行了检索。我们分两个阶段对研究进行筛选,提取数据,并根据GRADE推荐意见评估主要结局的证据质量。

主要结果

我们共纳入了13项研究,其中3项关于新冠病毒,10项关于严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)。研究发现,洗手、手部消毒、漱口、接触新冠病毒或SARS患者后清洁/淋浴具有保护作用。证据还表明,频繁洗手可预防医护人员之间的SARS传播。然而,一项研究报告称,由于加强了感染预防措施,一线医护人员更容易出现手部皮肤损伤。根据GRADE,我们主要结局的证据确定性非常低。我们未找到任何评估洗消措施对新冠病毒住院率和死亡率影响的研究。此外,我们也未找到任何将洗消干预措施与其他公共卫生措施进行比较的研究。

结论

目前关于新冠病毒洗消干预措施的证据有限,因为其主要基于来自SARS的间接证据。纳入研究的结果一致表明,洗消在大流行期间减少病例数方面很重要。及时实施洗消措施以及其他公共卫生干预措施对于确保取得预期成功可能至关重要。需要进一步开展高质量研究,提供洗消措施对新冠病毒有效性的直接证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验