Sung Minhee L, Black Anne C, Blevins Derek, Henry Brandy F, Cates-Wessel Kathryn, Dawes Michael A, Hagle Holly, Joudrey Paul J, Molfenter Todd, Levin Frances R, Fiellin David A, Edelman E Jennifer
From the Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities and Education Center of Innovation, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT (MLS, ACB); Program in Addiction Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (MLS, DAF, EJE); Section of General Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (MLS, ACB, DAF, EJE); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY (DB, FRL); Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY (DB, FRL); Consortium on Substance Use and Addiction, Social Science Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA (BFH); College of Education, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA (BFH); American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry, East Providence, RI (KC-W); VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA (MAD); Department of Psychiatry, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA (MAD); Addiction Technology Transfer Center Network Coordinating Office, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Kansas City, MO (HH); Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA (PJJ); Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (TM); Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT & Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT (DAF); Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT (EJE).
J Addict Med. 2025;19(2):150-156. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001388. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
Alternative models for methadone delivery outside of federal and state-regulated opioid treatment programs may improve access. We determined factors associated with clinician support for continuing office-based methadone.
We used data from the electronic Opioid Use Disorder Provider COVID-19 Survey conducted among X-waivered clinicians who were providing outpatient, longitudinal treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) from July 2020 to August 2020. The outcome variable was selecting "The opportunity for patients to receive office-based methadone" when asked "Which pandemic-related policy changes or new policy changes would you like to be continued or started after the pandemic?" Using sequential multivariable logistic regression modeling, we estimated the association between clinician and practice characteristics and support for office-based methadone.
Of 1900 respondents, 728 met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-eight percent indicated support for office-based methadone. Clinician characteristics associated with support for office-based methadone were being Black or African American versus White (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] [95% confidence interval (CI)], 2.88 [1.19-6.98]), having provided medications for OUD (MOUD) for >15 years versus ≤15 years (AOR [95% CI], 1.66 [1.02-2.68]), treating 51 to 100 patients with MOUD monthly versus <25 patients (AOR [95% CI], 1.79 [1.04-3.09]), providing methadone (AOR [95% CI], 1.71 [1.03-2.85]) versus not providing MOUD previously, and working in an academic medical center versus other settings (AOR [95% CI], 1.88 [1.11-3.16]).
A minority of surveyed X-waivered clinicians supported office-based methadone. Efforts to expand access to methadone via office-based settings should address implementation barriers.
在联邦和州监管的阿片类药物治疗项目之外,美沙酮给药的替代模式可能会改善可及性。我们确定了与临床医生支持继续在诊所提供美沙酮相关的因素。
我们使用了2020年7月至2020年8月期间对X豁免临床医生进行的电子阿片类药物使用障碍提供者COVID-19调查的数据,这些临床医生正在为阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)提供门诊长期治疗。当被问及“哪些与大流行相关的政策变化或新政策变化你希望在大流行后继续或启动?”时,结果变量是选择“患者接受诊所美沙酮治疗的机会”。使用序贯多变量逻辑回归模型,我们估计了临床医生和实践特征与对诊所美沙酮支持之间的关联。
在1900名受访者中,728人符合纳入标准。28%的人表示支持诊所美沙酮治疗。与支持诊所美沙酮治疗相关的临床医生特征包括:黑人或非裔美国人与白人相比(调整后的优势比[AOR][95%置信区间(CI)],2.88[1.19 - 6.98]);为OUD提供药物(MOUD)超过15年与≤15年相比(AOR[95%CI],1.66[1.02 - 2.68]);每月治疗51至100名MOUD患者与<25名患者相比(AOR[95%CI],1.79[1.04 - 3.09]);提供美沙酮(AOR[95%CI],1.71[1.03 - 2.85])与之前未提供MOUD相比;以及在学术医疗中心工作与其他环境相比(AOR[95%CI],1.88[1.11 - 3.16])。
少数接受调查的X豁免临床医生支持诊所美沙酮治疗。通过诊所环境扩大美沙酮可及性的努力应解决实施障碍。