• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of Biosafety Climate Scale for Biological and Biomedical Science Laboratories in the United States.美国生物与生物医学科学实验室生物安全气候量表的编制与验证
Appl Biosaf. 2021 Dec 1;26(4):221-231. doi: 10.1089/apb.2021.0006. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
2
Development and validation of safety climate scales for mobile remote workers using utility/electrical workers as exemplar.开发并验证使用电力/电工作为范例的移动远程工作者安全氛围量表。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.030. Epub 2013 May 10.
3
Development and validation of a new safety climate scale for petrochemical industries.石化行业新型安全氛围量表的开发与验证
Work. 2017;58(3):309-317. doi: 10.3233/WOR-172623.
4
Valid and reliable neonatal near-miss assessment scale in Ethiopia: a psychometric validation.在埃塞俄比亚,有效的和可靠的新生儿near-miss 评估量表:心理测量学验证。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2029334. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2029334.
5
[Validity and Reliability of a Nursing Process Scale].护理程序量表的效度与信度
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2022 Jun;69(3):31-40. doi: 10.6224/JN.202206_69(3).06.
6
Designing and psychometric evaluation of disease-related fear scale (D-RFS) in adults with epilepsy: A sequential exploratory mixed methods design.成人癫痫患者疾病相关恐惧量表(D-RFS)的设计和心理计量学评估:序贯探索性混合方法设计。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Sep;110:107169. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107169. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
7
Development and validation of a novel cosmetics safety assessment scale (CSAS): Factual understanding of cosmetic safety and fostering international awareness.开发和验证一种新型化妆品安全评估量表(CSAS):对化妆品安全性的事实理解和促进国际意识。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 10;17(11):e0276938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276938. eCollection 2022.
8
Development and psychometric validation of new questionnaires assessing experienced discrimination and internalised stigma among people with Covid-19.开发并验证新问卷以评估新冠患者的经历歧视和内化污名:一项心理测量学研究
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2022 May 26;31:e37. doi: 10.1017/S204579602200021X.
9
Disabled woman attitude scale: Reliability and validity study.残疾女性态度量表:信效度研究。
North Clin Istanb. 2021 Oct 28;8(5):454-463. doi: 10.14744/nci.2021.57701. eCollection 2021.
10
The Literacy-Based Scale for Measuring Reflections on a University Social Responsibility Curriculum: Development and Validation.基于素养的大学社会责任课程反思量表的编制与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 9;19(8):4545. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084545.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of psychological safety in high-containment laboratories: mixed method survey of community members and industry experts.对高防护实验室心理安全感的认知:社区成员和行业专家的混合方法调查
BMC Psychol. 2025 May 22;13(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02763-4.
2
Modifying to mimic for medical microbiology laboratory teaching: a new strategy to improve biosafety in class.模拟 以模拟 用于医学微生物学实验室教学:提高课堂生物安全性的新策略。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Sep 13;13:1257361. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1257361. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and psychometric evaluation of a safety climate scale for vineyards.葡萄园安全氛围量表的编制及心理计量学评价。
Environ Res. 2019 May;172:522-528. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
2
Biosafety Program Analytics Initiative for the Advancement of the Profession.职业发展生物安全计划分析倡议
Appl Biosaf. 2018 Jun;23(2):67-69. doi: 10.1177/1535676018767906. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
3
The importance of content and face validity in instrument development: lessons learnt from service users when developing the Recovering Quality of Life measure (ReQoL).内容和表面有效性在工具开发中的重要性:从服务使用者在开发“恢复生活质量量表”(ReQoL)时吸取的经验教训。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):1893-1902. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1847-y. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
4
Readability Assessment of Online Patient Education Material on Congestive Heart Failure.充血性心力衰竭在线患者教育材料的可读性评估
Adv Prev Med. 2017;2017:9780317. doi: 10.1155/2017/9780317. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
5
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
6
Biological research: Rethink biosafety.生物学研究:重新思考生物安全。
Nature. 2015 Nov 12;527(7577):155-8. doi: 10.1038/527155a.
7
Development and Validation of a Safety Climate Scale for Manufacturing Industry.制造业安全气候量表的开发与验证
Saf Health Work. 2015 Jun;6(2):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
8
Work safety climate, personal protection use, and injuries among Latino residential roofers.拉丁裔住宅屋顶工的工作安全氛围、个人防护用品使用情况及受伤情况
Am J Ind Med. 2015 Jan;58(1):69-76. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22404. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
9
Biosafety controls come under fire.生物安全控制受到抨击。
Nature. 2014 Jul 31;511(7511):515-6. doi: 10.1038/511515a.
10
Salmonella typhimurium infections associated with a community college microbiology laboratory--Maine, 2013.2013 年缅因州社区大学微生物学实验室相关的鼠伤寒沙门氏菌感染。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013 Nov 1;62(43):863.

美国生物与生物医学科学实验室生物安全气候量表的编制与验证

Development and Validation of Biosafety Climate Scale for Biological and Biomedical Science Laboratories in the United States.

作者信息

Mareedu-Boada Sivarchana, Hopp Torsten Alwin, Mitra Riten

机构信息

School of Public Health and Information Sciences, Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

Department of Environmental Health and Safety, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

出版信息

Appl Biosaf. 2021 Dec 1;26(4):221-231. doi: 10.1089/apb.2021.0006. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1089/apb.2021.0006
PMID:36034095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9134341/
Abstract

Industry-specific safety climate scales that measure safety status have been published, however, nothing specific to biological laboratories has ever been established. This study aimed to develop and validate a biosafety climate (BSCL) scale unique for research professionals (RPs) and biosafety professionals (BPs) at teaching and research biological laboratories affiliated to public universities in the United States. BSCL scale was developed from literature review. In study 1, 15-item biosafety climate (BSCL-15) scale with 15 items and 5 factors was pretested with  = 9 RPs and  = 7 BPs to perform reliability, content, and face validity analyses. In study 2, revised 17-item biosafety climate (BSCL-17) scale with 17 items and 5 factors was pilot tested with  = 91 RPs and  = 88 BPs. Correlation tests, Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin, Bartlett's test of sphericity, Cronbach's alpha, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were conducted to validate the BSCL-17 scale. EFA resulted in a 3-factor 17-item BSCL scale for both RPs and BPs. Internal consistency of the scale was > 0.8 for the BSCL scale and the underlying three factors, indicating high reliability. The factors identified for RPs are 1) management priority, communication and participation, 2) group norms, and 3) supervisor commitment. The factors identified for BPs are 1) management priority and communication, 2) group norms and participation, and 3) supervisor commitment. A valid and reliable BSCL scale to measure safety climate and quantify safety culture in biological laboratories has been presented. It can be used as a key performance indicator and aid in targeted interventions as part of process improvement of biological safety programs.

摘要

已经发布了衡量安全状况的特定行业安全气候量表,然而,针对生物实验室的具体量表从未建立过。本研究旨在开发并验证一种专门针对美国公立大学教学和研究生物实验室中的研究专业人员(RP)和生物安全专业人员(BP)的生物安全气候(BSCL)量表。BSCL量表是通过文献综述开发的。在研究1中,对9名RP和7名BP进行了预测试,以分析15项5因子的15项生物安全气候(BSCL - 15)量表的信度、内容效度和表面效度。在研究2中,对91名RP和88名BP进行了试点测试,以验证修订后的17项5因子的17项生物安全气候(BSCL - 17)量表。进行了相关性测试、Kaiser - Mayer - Olkin检验、Bartlett球形度检验、Cronbach's alpha检验和探索性因素分析(EFA)来验证BSCL - 17量表。EFA得出了适用于RP和BP的3因子17项BSCL量表。该量表及其潜在的三个因子的内部一致性均大于0.8,表明可靠性高。为RP确定的因子为:1)管理优先级、沟通与参与;2)群体规范;3)主管承诺。为BP确定的因子为:1)管理优先级与沟通;2)群体规范与参与;3)主管承诺。本文提出了一种有效且可靠的BSCL量表,用于衡量生物实验室的安全气候并量化安全文化。它可作为关键绩效指标,并有助于作为生物安全计划流程改进一部分的针对性干预措施。