Mareedu-Boada Sivarchana, Hopp Torsten Alwin, Mitra Riten
School of Public Health and Information Sciences, Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Department of Environmental Health and Safety, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Appl Biosaf. 2021 Dec 1;26(4):221-231. doi: 10.1089/apb.2021.0006. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
Industry-specific safety climate scales that measure safety status have been published, however, nothing specific to biological laboratories has ever been established. This study aimed to develop and validate a biosafety climate (BSCL) scale unique for research professionals (RPs) and biosafety professionals (BPs) at teaching and research biological laboratories affiliated to public universities in the United States. BSCL scale was developed from literature review. In study 1, 15-item biosafety climate (BSCL-15) scale with 15 items and 5 factors was pretested with = 9 RPs and = 7 BPs to perform reliability, content, and face validity analyses. In study 2, revised 17-item biosafety climate (BSCL-17) scale with 17 items and 5 factors was pilot tested with = 91 RPs and = 88 BPs. Correlation tests, Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin, Bartlett's test of sphericity, Cronbach's alpha, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were conducted to validate the BSCL-17 scale. EFA resulted in a 3-factor 17-item BSCL scale for both RPs and BPs. Internal consistency of the scale was > 0.8 for the BSCL scale and the underlying three factors, indicating high reliability. The factors identified for RPs are 1) management priority, communication and participation, 2) group norms, and 3) supervisor commitment. The factors identified for BPs are 1) management priority and communication, 2) group norms and participation, and 3) supervisor commitment. A valid and reliable BSCL scale to measure safety climate and quantify safety culture in biological laboratories has been presented. It can be used as a key performance indicator and aid in targeted interventions as part of process improvement of biological safety programs.
已经发布了衡量安全状况的特定行业安全气候量表,然而,针对生物实验室的具体量表从未建立过。本研究旨在开发并验证一种专门针对美国公立大学教学和研究生物实验室中的研究专业人员(RP)和生物安全专业人员(BP)的生物安全气候(BSCL)量表。BSCL量表是通过文献综述开发的。在研究1中,对9名RP和7名BP进行了预测试,以分析15项5因子的15项生物安全气候(BSCL - 15)量表的信度、内容效度和表面效度。在研究2中,对91名RP和88名BP进行了试点测试,以验证修订后的17项5因子的17项生物安全气候(BSCL - 17)量表。进行了相关性测试、Kaiser - Mayer - Olkin检验、Bartlett球形度检验、Cronbach's alpha检验和探索性因素分析(EFA)来验证BSCL - 17量表。EFA得出了适用于RP和BP的3因子17项BSCL量表。该量表及其潜在的三个因子的内部一致性均大于0.8,表明可靠性高。为RP确定的因子为:1)管理优先级、沟通与参与;2)群体规范;3)主管承诺。为BP确定的因子为:1)管理优先级与沟通;2)群体规范与参与;3)主管承诺。本文提出了一种有效且可靠的BSCL量表,用于衡量生物实验室的安全气候并量化安全文化。它可作为关键绩效指标,并有助于作为生物安全计划流程改进一部分的针对性干预措施。