Liu Huiyu, Peng Yang, Liu Zicai, Wen Xin, Li Fang, Zhong Lida, Rao Jinzhu, Li Li, Wang Minghong, Wang Pu
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yue Bei People's Hospital, Shaoguan, China.
School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 11;13:918974. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.918974. eCollection 2022.
Our study aims to measure the cortical correlates of swallowing execution in patients with dysphagia after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) therapy using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), and observe the change of pattern of brain activation in stroke patients with dysphagia after rTMS intervention. In addition, we tried to analyze the effect of rTMS on brain activation in dysphagia patients with different lesion sides. This study also concentrated on the effect of stimulating the affected mylohyoid cortical region by 5 Hz rTMS, providing clinical evidence for rTMS therapy of dysphagia in stroke patients.
This study was a sham-controlled, single-blind, randomized controlled study with a blinded observer. A total of 49 patients completed the study, which was randomized to the rTMS group ( = 23) and sham rTMS group ( = 26) by the random number table method. The rTMS group received 5 Hz rTMS stimulation to the affected mylohyoid cortical region of the brain and the sham rTMS group underwent rTMS using the same parameters as the rTMS group, except for the position of the coil. Each patient received 2 weeks of stimulation followed by conventional swallowing therapy. Standardized Swallowing Assessment (SSA), Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale (FEDSS), Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS), and functional oral intake status were assessed at two times: baseline (before treatment) and 2 weeks (after intervention). Meanwhile, we use the fNIRS system to measure the cerebral hemodynamic changes during the experimental procedure.
The rTMS group exhibited significant improvement in the SSA scale, FEDSS scale, and PAS scale after rTMS therapy (all < 0.001). The sham rTMS group had the same analysis on the same scales (all < 0.001). There was no significant difference observed in clinical assessments at 2 weeks after baseline between the rTMS group and sham rTMS group (all > 0.05). However, there were statistically significant differences between the two groups in the rate of change in the FEDSS score ( = 0.018) and PAS score ( = 0.004), except for the SSA score ( = 0.067). As for the removal rate of the feeding tube, there was no significant difference between the rTMS group and sham rTMS group ( = 0.355), but there was a significant difference compared with the baseline characteristics in both groups ( < 0.001, = 0.002). In fNIRS analysis, the block average result showed differences in brain areas RPFC (right prefrontal cortex) and RMC (right motor cortex) significantly between the rTMS group and sham rTMS group after intervention ( = 0.046, = 0.006). In the subgroup analysis, rTMS group was divided into left-rTMS group and right-rTMS group and sham rTMS group was divided into sham left-rTMS group and sham right-rTMS group. The fNIRS results showed no significance in block average and block differential after intervention between the left-rTMS group and sham left-rTMS group, but differences were statistically significant between the right-rTMS group and sham right-rTMS group in block average: channel 30 (T = -2.34, = 0.028) in LPFC (left prefrontal cortex) and 16 (T = 2.54, = 0.018) in RMC. After intervention, there was no significance in left-rTMS group compared with baseline, but in right-rTMS group, channel 27 (T = 2.18, = 0.039) in LPFC and 47 (T = 2.17, = 0.039) in RPFC had significance in block differential. In the sham rTMS group, neither sham left-rTMS group and sham right-rTMS group had significant differences in block average and block differential in each brain area after intervention ( > 0.05).
The present study confirmed that a 5-Hz rTMS is feasible at the affected mylohyoid cortical region in post-stroke patients with dysphagia and rTMS therapy can alter cortical excitability. Based on previous studies, there is a dominant hemisphere in swallowing and the results of our fNIRS analysis seemed to show a better increase in cortical activation on the right side than on the left after rTMS of the affected mylohyoid cortical region. However, there was no difference between the left and right hemispheres in the subgroup analysis. Nevertheless, the present study provides a novel and feasible method of applying fNIRS to assessment in stroke patients with dysphagia.
本研究旨在使用功能近红外光谱技术(fNIRS)测量吞咽困难患者在重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗后吞咽执行的皮质相关性,并观察吞咽困难的中风患者在rTMS干预后脑激活模式的变化。此外,我们试图分析rTMS对不同病变侧吞咽困难患者脑激活的影响。本研究还聚焦于5Hz rTMS刺激受影响的下颌舌骨肌皮质区域的效果,为中风患者吞咽困难的rTMS治疗提供临床证据。
本研究是一项有假刺激对照、单盲、随机对照研究,观察者为盲法。共有49例患者完成研究,通过随机数字表法随机分为rTMS组(n = 23)和假rTMS组(n = 26)。rTMS组接受5Hz rTMS刺激大脑受影响的下颌舌骨肌皮质区域,假rTMS组除线圈位置外,使用与rTMS组相同的参数进行rTMS。每位患者接受2周刺激,随后进行常规吞咽治疗。在两个时间点评估标准化吞咽评估(SSA)、纤维内镜吞咽困难严重程度量表(FEDSS)、渗透 - 误吸量表(PAS)和功能性经口摄入状态:基线(治疗前)和2周(干预后)。同时,我们使用fNIRS系统测量实验过程中的脑血流动力学变化。
rTMS组在rTMS治疗后SSA量表、FEDSS量表和PAS量表均有显著改善(均P < 0.001)。假rTMS组在相同量表上有相同分析结果(均P < 0.001)。rTMS组和假rTMS组在基线后2周的临床评估中无显著差异(均P > 0.05)。然而,除SSA评分(P = 0.067)外,两组在FEDSS评分变化率(P = 0.018)和PAS评分变化率(P = 0.004)上有统计学显著差异。至于鼻饲管拔除率,rTMS组和假rTMS组之间无显著差异(P = 0.355),但两组与基线特征相比均有显著差异(P < 0.001,P = 0.002)。在fNIRS分析中,干预后rTMS组和假rTMS组在脑区右前额叶皮质(RPFC)和右运动皮质(RMC)的组块平均结果显示有显著差异(P = 0.046,P = 0.006)。在亚组分析中,rTMS组分为左rTMS组和右rTMS组,假rTMS组分为假左rTMS组和假右rTMS组。fNIRS结果显示,干预后左rTMS组和假左rTMS组在组块平均和组块差异上无显著性,但右rTMS组和假右rTMS组在组块平均上有统计学显著差异:左前额叶皮质(LPFC)的通道30(T = -2.34,P = 0.02)和右运动皮质(RMC)的通道16(T = 2.54,P = 0.018)。干预后,左rTMS组与基线相比无显著性,但在右rTMS组中,左前额叶皮质的通道27(T = 2.18,P = 0.039)和右前额叶皮质的通道47(T = 2.17,P = 0.039)在组块差异上有显著性。在假rTMS组中,干预后假左rTMS组和假右rTMS组在每个脑区的组块平均和组块差异上均无显著差异(P > 0.05)。
本研究证实,5Hz rTMS对中风后吞咽困难患者受影响的下颌舌骨肌皮质区域是可行的,且rTMS治疗可改变皮质兴奋性。基于先前研究,吞咽存在优势半球,我们的fNIRS分析结果似乎显示,在受影响的下颌舌骨肌皮质区域进行rTMS后,右侧皮质激活的增加比左侧更好。然而,在亚组分析中左右半球之间无差异。尽管如此,本研究提供了一种将fNIRS应用于中风吞咽困难患者评估中的新颖且可行的方法。