• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

爱尔兰共和国动物保护的政治显著性(2011 - 2020年):爱尔兰各政党在动物福利和野生动物保护方面做出了哪些承诺?

The Political Salience of Animal Protection in the Republic of Ireland (2011-2020): What Do Irish Political Parties Pledge on Animal Welfare and Wildlife Conservation?

作者信息

Hus Annick, McCulloch Steven P

机构信息

Edinburgh Medical School, Biomedical Sciences, Hugh Robson Building, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, UK.

Centre for Animal Welfare, University of Winchester, Winchester SO22 4NR, UK.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2024 Dec 15;14(24):3619. doi: 10.3390/ani14243619.

DOI:10.3390/ani14243619
PMID:39765523
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11672815/
Abstract

Ireland is the largest beef trader and a major dairy exporter within the European Union. Horse racing holds significant cultural value, while greyhound racing is economically important at the regional level. As public concern about farm animal welfare rises and biodiversity loss intensifies, this research examines the political salience of animal protection in Ireland across the 2011, 2016, and 2020 general elections. Political salience measures the degree of public concern about political issues, with party manifestos serving as indicators of this concern. Using both quantitative and qualitative methods, this study analysed 364 statements on animal protection from Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael, the Green Party, the Labour Party, and Sinn Féin. The results show a significant increase in the frequency and positivity of animal protection statements over the course of the election period, with a shift in the attitudes of Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael. The Green Party has consistently promoted progressive animal protection policies. Key issues such as farmed animal welfare, wildlife and biodiversity, and horse and greyhound racing have gained prominence in party manifestos, also reflecting economic influences. Despite this growing focus, critical issues such as the puppy trade and certain aspects of farmed animal welfare remain underrepresented. This research provides the first comprehensive academic analysis of animal protection policy in political party manifestos in the Republic of Ireland.

摘要

爱尔兰是欧盟内最大的牛肉贸易国和主要的乳制品出口国。赛马具有重要的文化价值,而赛狗在地区层面具有重要的经济意义。随着公众对农场动物福利的关注度上升以及生物多样性丧失加剧,本研究考察了爱尔兰在2011年、2016年和2020年大选中动物保护的政治显著性。政治显著性衡量公众对政治问题的关注程度,政党宣言是这种关注的指标。本研究采用定量和定性方法,分析了共和党、统一党、绿党、工党和新芬党关于动物保护的364份声明。结果显示,在选举期间,动物保护声明的频率和积极性显著增加,共和党和统一党的态度发生了转变。绿党一直倡导进步的动物保护政策。农场动物福利、野生动物和生物多样性以及赛马和赛狗等关键问题在政党宣言中变得突出,这也反映了经济影响。尽管关注度不断提高,但诸如幼犬交易和农场动物福利的某些方面等关键问题在宣言中的体现仍然不足。本研究首次对爱尔兰共和国政党宣言中的动物保护政策进行了全面的学术分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afa9/11672815/481282e59fb9/animals-14-03619-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afa9/11672815/8495b95d2626/animals-14-03619-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afa9/11672815/481282e59fb9/animals-14-03619-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afa9/11672815/8495b95d2626/animals-14-03619-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afa9/11672815/481282e59fb9/animals-14-03619-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Political Salience of Animal Protection in the Republic of Ireland (2011-2020): What Do Irish Political Parties Pledge on Animal Welfare and Wildlife Conservation?爱尔兰共和国动物保护的政治显著性(2011 - 2020年):爱尔兰各政党在动物福利和野生动物保护方面做出了哪些承诺?
Animals (Basel). 2024 Dec 15;14(24):3619. doi: 10.3390/ani14243619.
2
Brexit and Animal Protection: Legal and Political Context and a Framework to Assess Impacts on Animal Welfare.英国脱欧与动物保护:法律和政治背景以及评估对动物福利影响的框架
Animals (Basel). 2018 Nov 18;8(11):213. doi: 10.3390/ani8110213.
3
Beyond the Usual Suspects and Towards Politicisation: Immigration in Quebec's Party Manifestos, 1991-2018.超越常见因素,走向政治化:1991 - 2018年魁北克政党宣言中的移民问题
J Int Migr Integr. 2021;22(2):673-690. doi: 10.1007/s12134-020-00764-3. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
4
Public health policy in a time of change and disaster in South Africa: 1910-1920.南非变革与灾难时期的公共卫生政策:1910 - 1920年
Jamba. 2016 Sep 29;8(1):215. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v8i1.215. eCollection 2016.
5
Pattern of health promises for Indian democracy: A qualitative review of political manifestos.印度民主的健康承诺模式:对政治宣言的定性综述
J Family Med Prim Care. 2017 Jul-Sep;6(3):455-459. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_308_17.
6
Indicators of deprivation, voting patterns, and health status at area level in the Republic of Ireland.爱尔兰共和国地区层面的贫困指标、投票模式及健康状况。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Jan;56(1):36-44. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.1.36.
7
Brexit and Animal Welfare Impact Assessment: Analysis of the Threats Brexit Poses to Animal Protection in the UK, EU and Internationally.英国脱欧与动物福利影响评估:分析英国脱欧对英国、欧盟及国际层面动物保护所构成的威胁。
Animals (Basel). 2019 Mar 26;9(3):117. doi: 10.3390/ani9030117.
8
A health system assessment approach to analysis of political parties' health proposals, Portugal.卫生系统评估方法分析政党的卫生提案,葡萄牙。
Bull World Health Organ. 2024 Nov 1;102(11):820-827. doi: 10.2471/BLT.24.291831. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
9
An Age of Promises: British Election Manifestos and Addresses 1900-97.承诺的时代:1900 - 1997年英国选举宣言与演讲
20 Century Br Hist. 2020 Mar 1;31(1):1-26. doi: 10.1093/tcbh/hwz033.
10
Brexit and Animal Welfare Impact Assessment: Analysis of the Opportunities Brexit Presents for Animal Protection in the UK, EU, and Internationally.英国脱欧与动物福利影响评估:分析英国脱欧给英国、欧盟及国际动物保护带来的机遇。
Animals (Basel). 2019 Oct 28;9(11):877. doi: 10.3390/ani9110877.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of the Competition on miRNA, Proteins, and Metabolites in the Blood Exosomes of the Horse.竞争对马血液外泌体中微小RNA、蛋白质和代谢物的影响。
Genes (Basel). 2025 Feb 15;16(2):224. doi: 10.3390/genes16020224.

本文引用的文献

1
Wild Fish Welfare in UK Commercial Sea Fisheries: Qualitative Analysis of Stakeholder Views.英国商业海洋渔业中的野生鱼类福利:利益相关者观点的定性分析
Animals (Basel). 2022 Oct 13;12(20):2756. doi: 10.3390/ani12202756.
2
Welfare of pigs on farm.农场中猪的福利。
EFSA J. 2022 Aug 25;20(8):e07421. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7421. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Animal welfare risks of global aquaculture.全球水产养殖的动物福利风险。
Sci Adv. 2021 Apr 2;7(14). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg0677. Print 2021 Apr.
4
A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture.全球水产养殖 20 年回顾
Nature. 2021 Mar;591(7851):551-563. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03308-6. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
5
Bridging environmental and financial cost of dairy production: A case study of Irish agricultural policy.弥合乳制品生产的环境和经济成本:以爱尔兰农业政策为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Feb 15;615:597-607. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.310. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
6
Thinking chickens: a review of cognition, emotion, and behavior in the domestic chicken.有思想的鸡:关于家鸡认知、情感和行为的综述
Anim Cogn. 2017 Mar;20(2):127-147. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1064-4. Epub 2017 Jan 2.
7
Animal welfare: the role of non-governmental organisations.动物福利:非政府组织的作用
Rev Sci Tech. 2005 Aug;24(2):625-38.