B.A.T. (Investments) Limited, Regents Park Road, Millbrook, Southampton, SO15 8TL, UK.
DoctorProctorScience Limited, 157 Cavendish Meads, Sunninghill, Ascot, SL5 9TG, UK.
Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Oct;17(7):2017-2030. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03062-1. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether biomarkers of exposure (BoE) and potential harm (BoPH) are modified when smokers either continue to smoke or switch from smoking cigarettes to exclusive use of a tobacco heating product (THP) in an ambulatory setting over the period of a year, and to compare any changes with smokers who quit tobacco use completely and with never smokers' biomarker levels. Participants in this year-long ambulatory study were healthy smokers with a self-reported low intent to quit assigned either to continue smoking or switch to a THP; a group of smokers with a self-reported high intent to quit who abstained from tobacco use; and a group of never smokers. Various BoE and BoPH related to oxidative stress, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases and cancer were assessed at baseline and up to 360 days. Substantial and sustained reductions in BoE levels were found at 360 days for both participants who switched from smoking to THP use and participants who quit smoking, in many cases the reductions being of a similar order for both groups. The never smoker group typically had lower levels of the measured BoEs than either of these groups, and much lower levels than participants who continued to smoke. Several BoPHs were found to change in a favourable direction (towards never smoker levels) over the year study for participants who completely switched to THP or quit, while BoPHs such as soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 were found to change in an unfavourable direction (away from never smoker levels) in participants who continued to smoke. Our findings, alongside chemical and toxicological studies undertaken on the THP used in this study, lead to the conclusion that smokers who would have otherwise continued to smoke and instead switch entirely to the use of this THP, will reduce their exposure to tobacco smoke toxicants and as a consequence are reasonably likely to reduce disease risks compared to those continuing to smoke.
本研究旨在调查在为期一年的时间里,处于动态监测环境下,吸烟者继续吸烟或改用加热不燃烧烟草制品(THP),其暴露生物标志物(BoE)和潜在危害生物标志物(BoPH)是否会发生变化,并与完全戒烟的吸烟者和从不吸烟人群的生物标志物水平进行比较。在这项为期一年的动态监测研究中,参与者为有低戒烟意愿且自述的健康吸烟者,被分配继续吸烟或改用 THP;一组有高戒烟意愿且自述的吸烟者则完全停止吸烟;一组从不吸烟者。在基线和长达 360 天的时间里,评估了与氧化应激、心血管和呼吸系统疾病以及癌症相关的各种 BoE 和 BoPH。结果发现,改用 THP 或完全戒烟的参与者,其 BoE 水平在 360 天时都出现了大幅且持续的降低,在许多情况下,两组的降低幅度相似。从不吸烟者组的测量 BoE 水平通常低于这两组,且远低于继续吸烟的参与者。对于完全改用 THP 或戒烟的参与者,许多 BoPH 朝着有利于从不吸烟者的方向发生了变化(向从不吸烟者水平靠拢),而可溶性细胞间黏附分子-1 等 BoPH 则朝着不利于从不吸烟者的方向发生了变化(远离从不吸烟者水平)。我们的研究结果,以及对本研究中使用的 THP 进行的化学和毒理学研究,得出的结论是,那些本来会继续吸烟但改用这种 THP 的吸烟者,将减少其对烟草烟雾毒物的接触,因此与继续吸烟相比,他们降低疾病风险的可能性更大。