35 E. 8th St., Ste. 45, New York, NY 10028.
Psychoanal Q. 2022;91(2):395-410. doi: 10.1080/00332828.2022.2089519.
The author proposes that the concept of framing activity provides a useful approach to neutrality by synthesizing relational approaches with an extension of José Bleger's (1967, 2012) conceptualization of the frame as containing primitive aspects of the analysand. She argues that the analytic frame also serves as a depository, or bulwark, for the analyst's ideological alignments. Identifying how ongoing framing activity is in tension with this bulwark affords a means of approaching, interrogating, and "doing" neutrality that elaborates the flexibility and self-reflection that contemporary psychoanalytic thinking seeks to bring to an earlier, more rigid idea of "the frame." Clinical vignettes focus on framing and its connection to neutrality in the context of remote treatments.
作者提出,框架活动的概念通过将关系方法与何塞·布莱格(José Bleger)(1967、2012)对框架的概念的扩展相结合,为中立性提供了一种有用的方法,该扩展将分析对象的原始方面包含在框架中。她认为,分析框架也充当了分析师意识形态结盟的存放处或堡垒。确定正在进行的框架活动如何与这个堡垒产生紧张关系,为接近、质疑和“实现”中立性提供了一种手段,这种手段阐述了灵活性和自我反思,当代精神分析思想试图将其应用于更早、更僵化的“框架”概念。临床案例集中于框架及其在远程治疗背景下与中立性的联系。