Adler E, Bachant J L
Westchester Center for the Study of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, USA. 76760,
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1996;44(4):1021-46. doi: 10.1177/000306519604400403.
This paper re-examines within a contemporary context an essential foundation of classical technique, the psychoanalytic situation. Defined in terms of basic elements of psychoanalytic relatedness which make possible the most profound exploration of human motivation, its core structure is viewed as an extraordinary interpersonal arrangement anchored by two clearly differentiated yet complimentary ways of relating: free-association and analytic neutrality. The patient's role, organized by the prerequisites of expressive freedom, is counter posed with the psychoanalyst's, which is structured to empower listening and understanding. Elaborating the parameters of this unique relationship, the authors emphasize the synergic effects of each participants' activity in creating a vehicle for destabilizing neurotic equilibrium. An extensive discussion of analytic neutrality, conceived as guiding ideal that informs all the analyst's attitudes and actions in the exploration of psychic reality, is presented. Specifically, the authors distinguish three essential dimensions which bear upon the interactive process: neutrality with regard to conflict, neutrality with regard to sequence, and neutrality with regard to transference. In contrast to the rigid constraint on human responsiveness often caricatured in the literature, this vision of technical neutrality establishes its vital contribution to the integrity, depth, and tone of any analytic process that unfolds.
本文在当代背景下重新审视了经典技术的一个重要基础——精神分析情境。精神分析情境是根据精神分析相关性的基本要素来定义的,这些要素使得对人类动机进行最深入的探索成为可能,其核心结构被视为一种特殊的人际安排,由两种明显不同但相互补充的关系方式所支撑:自由联想和分析中立。患者的角色由表达自由的前提条件所组织,与精神分析师的角色相对立,精神分析师的角色旨在促进倾听和理解。作者详细阐述了这种独特关系的参数,强调了每个参与者的活动在创造一个打破神经症平衡的媒介方面的协同作用。本文还对分析中立进行了广泛讨论,将其视为一种指导理想,它贯穿于分析师在探索心理现实过程中的所有态度和行动。具体而言,作者区分了影响互动过程的三个基本维度:冲突方面的中立、顺序方面的中立和移情方面的中立。与文献中经常描绘的对人类反应的严格限制不同,这种技术中立的观点确立了它对任何展开的分析过程的完整性、深度和基调的重要贡献。