• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迁移特征对中国农村流动人口家庭农地利用安排的影响。

The impact of migration characteristics on rural migrant households' farmland use arrangements in China.

机构信息

Research Institute of Social Development, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

School of Public Finance and Taxation, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 29;17(8):e0273624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273624. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0273624
PMID:36037159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9423677/
Abstract

This paper investigates the impacts of migration characteristics on rural migrant households' farmland use arrangements in China. The results reveal that trailing migration, duration of migration and the proportion of co-migrants have a significant effect on the probability of rural migrant households' farmland abandonment. Commercial employment migration has a negative impact on the abandonment of farmland by migrant families. Migrant households are most likely to choose farmland abandonment in the western and middle regions of China and in small farmland areas. In the eastern region, and first tier and second tier Chinese cities, migrant households are more inclined to choose farmland transfer. Household earnings increase, which induces households to gradually give up the cultivation of farmland or to transfer farmland, constituting a mechanism in Chinese households' farmland use arrangements. Notably, the consolidation of arable land should be the focus in areas of low economic development. Furthermore, an effective mechanism for the transfer of farmland should be established.

摘要

本文研究了迁移特征对中国农村流动人口家庭农地利用安排的影响。研究结果表明,滞后迁移、迁移持续时间和共同迁移者的比例对农村流动人口家庭农地撂荒的概率有显著影响。商业就业迁移对流动人口家庭撂荒的影响是负面的。流动人口家庭最有可能选择在中国中西部地区和小农田地区放弃农地。在东部地区和一线城市和二线城市,流动人口家庭更倾向于选择农地流转。家庭收入的增加,导致家庭逐渐放弃耕地或流转耕地,构成了中国农户农地利用安排的一种机制。值得注意的是,在经济欠发达地区,应重点整合耕地。此外,应建立有效的农地流转机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/812f/9423677/d986a962c4c9/pone.0273624.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/812f/9423677/d986a962c4c9/pone.0273624.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/812f/9423677/d986a962c4c9/pone.0273624.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of migration characteristics on rural migrant households' farmland use arrangements in China.迁移特征对中国农村流动人口家庭农地利用安排的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 29;17(8):e0273624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273624. eCollection 2022.
2
Labor migration and farmland abandonment in rural China: Empirical results and policy implications.劳动力迁移与中国农村耕地撂荒:实证结果与政策启示。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Feb 15;232:738-750. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.136. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
3
Discussing the regional-scale arable land use intensity and environmental risk triggered by the micro-scale rural households' differentiation based on step-by-step evaluation-a case study of Shandong Province, China.基于递进评价探讨微观尺度农户分化引发的区域尺度耕地利用强度与环境风险——以山东省为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Mar;27(8):8271-8284. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07537-1. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
4
A study on the mode choice of large-scale households' farmland transfer-in in rural China: Based on the economic analysis paradigm of transaction costs.基于交易成本经济学分析范式的中国农村大规模农户耕地转入模式选择研究
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 17;18(10):e0287022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287022. eCollection 2023.
5
Migration, development and remittances in rural Mexico.墨西哥农村地区的人口迁移、发展与汇款
Int Migr. 1992 Jun;30(2):127-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.1992.tb00690.x.
6
International migration and the "moral" economy of the "Barani" peasantry.国际移民与“巴拉尼”农民的“道德”经济
Pak Dev Rev. 1991 Winter;30(4 Pt 2):1087-100.
7
Analysis of Farmland Abandonment and Government Supervision Traps in China.耕地撂荒与政府监管陷阱分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 13;18(4):1815. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041815.
8
Farmland Transfer, Social Security, and Households' Productive Investment: Based on China's CFPS Survey.农地流转、社会保障与农户生产性投资——基于中国 CFPS 调查数据
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 4;19(17):11082. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711082.
9
How Family Living Arrangements and Migration Distances Shape the Settlement Intentions of Rural Migrant Workers in China.家庭居住安排和迁移距离如何塑造中国农村流动人口的定居意愿。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 6;19(23):16308. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316308.
10
The health service use of aged rural-to-urban migrant workers in different types of cities in China.中国不同类型城市中老年农村到城市移民工人的卫生服务利用情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 28;21(1):606. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06638-3.

引用本文的文献

1
How does occupational prestige of migrant workers affect farmland transfer in China?农民工的职业声望如何影响中国的农地流转?
PLoS One. 2025 May 15;20(5):e0319468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319468. eCollection 2025.
2
A study on the influencing factors of rural land transfer willingness in different terrain areas--Based on the questionnaire survey data of Anhui Province and Qinghai Province, China.不同地形地区农村土地流转意愿的影响因素研究——基于中国安徽省和青海省的问卷调查数据。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 7;19(6):e0303078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303078. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Infrastructure projects and sustainable development: Discovering the stakeholders' perception in the case of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor.基础设施项目与可持续发展:在中巴经济走廊案例中探寻利益相关者的认知
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0237385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237385. eCollection 2020.
2
Labor migration and farmland abandonment in rural China: Empirical results and policy implications.劳动力迁移与中国农村耕地撂荒:实证结果与政策启示。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Feb 15;232:738-750. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.136. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
3
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.
社会心理学研究中的调节变量与中介变量区分:概念、策略及统计考量
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.