Suppr超能文献

家畜密度对布氏冈比亚锥虫和布氏罗得西亚锥虫的影响:基于因果推理的方法。

The effect of livestock density on Trypanosoma brucei gambiense and T. b. rhodesiense: A causal inference-based approach.

机构信息

Center for One Health Research, Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Aug 29;16(8):e0010155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010155. eCollection 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Domestic and wild animals are important reservoirs of the rhodesiense form of human African trypanosomiasis (rHAT), however quantification of this effect offers utility for deploying non-medical control activities, and anticipating their success when wildlife are excluded. Further, the uncertain role of animal reservoirs-particularly pigs-threatens elimination of transmission (EOT) targets set for the gambiense form (gHAT). Using a new time series of high-resolution cattle and pig density maps, HAT surveillance data collated by the WHO Atlas of HAT, and methods drawn from causal inference and spatial epidemiology, we conducted a retrospective ecological cohort study in Uganda, Malawi, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and South Sudan to estimate the effect of cattle and pig density on HAT risk. For rHAT, we found a positive effect for cattle (RR 1.61, 95% CI 0.90, 2.99) and pigs (RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.15, 2.75) in Uganda, and a negative effect for cattle (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.71, 1.10) and pigs (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.23, 0.67) in Malawi. For gHAT we found a negative effect for cattle in Uganda (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.50, 1.77) and South Sudan (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.54, 0.77) but a positive effect in DRC (1.17, 95% CI 1.04, 1.32). For pigs, we found a positive gHAT effect in both Uganda (RR 2.02, 95% CI 0.87, 3.94) and DRC (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.10, 1.37), and a negative association in South Sudan (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50, 0.98). These effects did not reach significance for the cattle-rHAT effect in Uganda or Malawi, or the cattle-gHAT and pig-gHAT effects in Uganda. While ecological bias may drive the findings in South Sudan, estimated E-values and simulation studies suggest unmeasured confounding and underreporting are unlikely to explain our findings in Malawi, Uganda, and DRC. Our results suggest cattle and pigs may be important reservoirs of rHAT in Uganda but not Malawi, and that pigs-and possibly cattle-may be gHAT reservoirs.

摘要

家养和野生动物是人类非洲锥虫病(rhodesiense 型,rHAT)的重要储存宿主,但定量评估这种效应对于部署非医学控制活动具有实际意义,并且在排除野生动物时可以预测其成功。此外,动物储存宿主(尤其是猪)的不确定作用威胁到为冈比亚锥虫病(gHAT)设定的消除传播(EOT)目标。利用新的高分辨率牛和猪密度图时间序列、世界卫生组织 HAT 地图集收集的 HAT 监测数据以及因果推断和空间流行病学方法,我们在乌干达、马拉维、刚果民主共和国和南苏丹进行了回顾性生态队列研究,以估计牛和猪密度对 HAT 风险的影响。对于 rHAT,我们发现牛(RR 1.61,95%CI 0.90,2.99)和猪(RR 2.07,95%CI 1.15,2.75)在乌干达有正效应,而牛(RR 0.88,95%CI 0.71,1.10)和猪(RR 0.42,95%CI 0.23,0.67)在马拉维有负效应。对于 gHAT,我们发现牛(RR 0.88,95%CI 0.50,1.77)和南苏丹(RR 0.63,95%CI 0.54,0.77)的牛和猪(RR 2.02,95%CI 0.87,3.94)在乌干达和刚果民主共和国(RR 1.23,95%CI 1.10,1.37)有正效应,而在乌干达和南苏丹(RR 1.17,95%CI 1.04,1.32)有正效应。对于猪,我们发现 gHAT 在乌干达(RR 0.66,95%CI 0.50,0.98)和刚果民主共和国(RR 1.23,95%CI 1.10,1.37)有正效应,在南苏丹有负相关(RR 0.66,95%CI 0.50,0.98)。在乌干达或马拉维,牛-rHAT 效应或牛-gHAT 和猪-gHAT 效应在乌干达或马拉维都没有达到显著性,而在南苏丹,估计的 E 值和模拟研究表明,未测量的混杂和漏报不太可能解释我们在马拉维、乌干达和刚果民主共和国的发现。我们的结果表明,牛和猪可能是乌干达 rHAT 的重要储存宿主,但不是马拉维,而猪(可能还有牛)可能是 gHAT 的储存宿主。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7c5/9462671/71a5b63d9707/pntd.0010155.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验