Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Uganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda.
Acta Trop. 2023 Apr;240:106804. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106804. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
. In response to large strides in the control of human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), in the early 2000s the WHO set targets for elimination of both the gambiense (gHAT) and rhodesiense (rHAT) forms as a public health (EPHP) problem by 2020, and elimination of gHAT transmisson (EOT) by 2030. While global EPHP targets have been met, and EOT appears within reach, current control strategies may fail to achieve gHAT EOT in the presence of animal reservoirs, the role of which is currently uncertain. Furthermore, rHAT is not targeted for EOT due to the known importance of animal reservoirs for this form.
. To evaluate the utility of a One Health approach to gHAT and rHAT EOT, we built and parameterized a compartmental stochastic model, using the Institute for Disease Modeling's Compartmental Modeling Software, to six HAT epidemics: the national rHAT epidemics in Uganda and Malawi, the national gHAT epidemics in Uganda and South Sudan, and two separate gHAT epidemics in Democratic Republic of Congo distinguished by dominant vector species. In rHAT foci the reservoir animal sub-model was stratified on four species groups, while in gHAT foci domestic swine were assumed to be the only competent reservoir. The modeled time horizon was 2005-2045, with calibration performed using HAT surveillance data and Optuna. Interventions included insecticide and trypanocide treatment of domestic animal reservoirs at varying coverage levels.
. Validation against HAT surveillance data indicates favorable performance overall, with the possible exception of DRC. EOT was not observed in any modeled scenarios for rHAT, however insecticide treatment consistently performed better than trypanocide treatment in terms of rHAT control. EOT was not observed for gHAT at 0% coverage of domestic reservoirs with trypanocides or insecticides, but was observed by 2030 in all test scenarios; again, insecticides demonstrated superior performance to trypanocides.
EOT likely cannot be achieved for rHAT without control of wildlife reservoirs, however insecticide treatment of domestic animals holds promise for improved control. In the presence of domestic animal reservoirs, gHAT EOT may not be achieved under current control strategies.
在控制人类非洲锥虫病(HAT)方面取得重大进展后,世界卫生组织(WHO)在 21 世纪初设定了目标,即在 2020 年前消除冈比亚锥虫病(gHAT)和罗得西亚锥虫病(rHAT)的公共卫生(EPHP)问题,并在 2030 年前消除冈比亚锥虫病传播(EOT)。虽然全球 EPHP 目标已经实现,EOT 似乎也触手可及,但在动物储存库存在的情况下,目前的控制策略可能无法实现 gHAT EOT,而这些储存库的作用目前尚不清楚。此外,rHAT 并未被设定为 EOT,因为动物储存库对该病具有重要性。
为了评估“One Health”方法对 gHAT 和 rHAT EOT 的应用价值,我们构建并使用疾病建模研究所的 compartmental Modeling Software 对 6 次 HAT 疫情进行参数化,这 6 次疫情分别是:乌干达和马拉维的全国性 rHAT 疫情、乌干达和南苏丹的全国性 gHAT 疫情,以及刚果民主共和国两个不同的 gHAT 疫情,这两个疫情以不同的优势媒介物种区分。在 rHAT 疫区,储存动物子模型分为四个物种组,而在 gHAT 疫区,家猪被认为是唯一的有能力的储存宿主。建模时间范围为 2005-2045 年,使用 HAT 监测数据和 Optuna 进行校准。干预措施包括对不同覆盖率的家养动物储存库进行杀虫剂和杀锥虫药物治疗。
与 HAT 监测数据的验证表明,整体表现良好,可能除刚果民主共和国以外。在任何模拟场景中,rHAT 均未观察到 EOT,但杀虫剂治疗在 rHAT 控制方面始终优于杀锥虫药物治疗。在对 gHAT 不进行任何杀虫剂或杀锥虫药物处理的情况下,也没有观察到 0%的家猪储存库达到 EOT,但在所有测试场景中都在 2030 年观察到;同样,杀虫剂的表现优于杀锥虫药物。
如果不控制野生动物储存库,rHAT 可能无法实现 EOT,但对家养动物进行杀虫剂处理可能会提高控制效果。在存在家养动物储存库的情况下,gHAT EOT 可能无法通过当前的控制策略实现。