Health Economics and Policy, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
Health Economics and Policy, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
ESMO Open. 2022 Oct;7(5):100569. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100569. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
This study aimed to describe the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence supporting reimbursement decisions of new cancer drugs and analyze the influence of trial characteristics and the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) on the likelihood of reimbursement in Sweden.
Data were extracted from all appraisal dossiers for new cancer drugs seeking reimbursement in Sweden and claiming added therapeutical value between the years 2010 and 2020. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and logistic regression models were also used with the cost per QALY, study design, comparator, and evidence on final outcomes in the clinical trials as predictors of reimbursement.
All 60 included appraisals were based on trial evidence that assessed at least one final outcome (overall survival [OS] or quality of life [QoL]), although rarely as a primary outcome. Of the appraisals with a final decision (n = 58), 79% were approved for reimbursement. Among the reimbursed drugs, only half had trial evidence demonstrating improved OS or QoL. Only one drug had trial evidence supporting improvements in both OS and QoL. The average cost per QALY for reimbursed cancer drugs was estimated to be 748 560 SEK (€73 583). A higher cost per QALY was found to decrease the likelihood of reimbursement by 9.4% for every 100 000 SEK (€9830) higher cost per QALY (P = 0.03). For cost-effectiveness models without direct evidence of improvements in final outcomes, a larger QALY gain was observed compared with those with evidence mainly relying on intermediate and surrogate outcomes.
There are substantial uncertainties in the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence underlying reimbursement decisions of new cancer drugs. Decision makers should be cautious of the limited evidence on patient-centered outcomes and the implications of allocating resources to expensive treatments with uncertain value for money.
本研究旨在描述支持新癌症药物报销决策的临床和成本效益证据,并分析试验特征和每质量调整生命年(QALY)成本对在瑞典获得报销的可能性的影响。
从瑞典寻求新癌症药物报销并声称在 2010 年至 2020 年期间具有附加治疗价值的所有评估档案中提取数据。使用描述性统计数据对数据进行分析,并使用逻辑回归模型,其中每 QALY 成本、研究设计、对照和临床试验中最终结果的证据作为报销的预测因子。
所有 60 项评估均基于评估至少一项最终结果(总生存[OS]或生活质量[QoL])的试验证据,尽管很少作为主要结果。在具有最终决定的评估中(n=58),79%的评估被批准报销。在报销的药物中,只有一半的试验证据表明 OS 或 QoL 得到改善。只有一种药物的试验证据表明 OS 和 QoL 均得到改善。报销癌症药物的每 QALY 平均成本估计为 748560 瑞典克朗(73583 欧元)。每 QALY 成本增加 100000 瑞典克朗(9830 欧元),被发现会降低报销的可能性 9.4%(P=0.03)。对于没有直接改善最终结果证据的成本效益模型,与主要依赖中间和替代结果的模型相比,观察到更大的 QALY 获益。
新癌症药物报销决策所依据的临床和成本效益证据存在很大的不确定性。决策者应谨慎对待以患者为中心的结果证据有限,以及将资源分配给具有不确定性价比的昂贵治疗方法的影响。