Protein Loss in Peritoneal Effluent: Different Meaning for 24-h versus PET Samples.

INTRODUCTION

Quantification of peritoneal protein loss (PPL) may be expressed according to a timely collection (24-h measurement or 4-h PET assessment) and as a concentration. The aim of this study was to compare the quantification methods of 24-h and 4-h collections.

METHODS

This study included 81 prevalent peritoneal dialysis patients. Demographics and clinical and bioelectrical impedance features were registered. PPL was measured (4-h PET and 24-h results) and peritoneal protein clearance was calculated. A linear regression model was performed.

RESULTS

Age and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (compared to cycler) were positively associated with greater PPL on 24-h collections. Neither cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes nor the comorbidity Charlson Index was significantly associated with PPL. There was a consistent univariable relationship with D/P creatinine, whichever sampling method was used. Only 24-h measurements of PPL correlated with body composition variables. In multiple linear regression analysis, D/P creatinine association with PPL stands out. On the other hand, 24-h determinations (in grams or clearance) were associated with overhydration. PET protein quantification was associated with peritoneal creatinine clearance.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Different methods sign different pathophysiological pathways. PET protein loss quantification should be regarded as a marker of peritoneal membrane intrinsic permeability. Measurements of a 24-h sample might be closer to patients' clinical status and prognosis, signalizing opportunities for therapy intervention.