Beckett Megan K, Hambarsoomian Katrin, Martino Steven C, Agniel Denis, Hudson Scholle Sarah, Maksut Jessica L, Mathews Megan, Orr Nate, Elliott Marc N
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA.
Med Care. 2023 Jan 1;61(1):3-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001769. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
Health care quality varies by patient factors, including race-and-ethnicity and preferred language. Addressing inequities requires identifying them and incentivizing equity.
We apply an approach first implemented in the Medicare Advantage setting to measure equity in patient experiences by race-and-ethnicity [Asian American and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (AA and NHPI), Black, Hispanic, vs. White] and language preference (English-preferring vs. another-language-preferring). We identify characteristics of hospitals providing high-quality equitable care.
We estimated, standardized, and combined performance measures into a Health Equity Summary Score (HESS) using 2016-2019 Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey data. The HCAHPS HESS considered current cross-sectional performance, within-hospital improvement, and overall improvement by race-and-ethnicity and language preference.
A total of 3333 US hospitals with 2019 HCAHPS Star Ratings.
The HCAHPS HESS was calculable for 44% of hospitals. High-scoring (4-5 diamonds on a 1-diamond to 5-diamond scale) hospitals tended to be smaller than intermediate-scoring [3 diamonds (14% of high-scoring hospitals had <100 beds vs. 7% of intermediate-scoring hospitals, P <0.001) and were less often for-profit (20% vs. 31%, P <0.001)]. While a significant percentage (29%) of patients served by high-scoring hospitals were AA and NHPI, Black, or Hispanic, and 9% were another-language-preferring, there were smaller proportions of Black and Hispanic patients in high-scoring versus other hospitals. HESS performance was negatively associated with the percentage of patients preferring another language to English. HESS scores were moderately correlated with overall Star Ratings ( r =0.70).
The HCAHPS HESS and practices of high-scoring hospitals could promote more equitable patient experiences.
医疗保健质量因患者因素而异,包括种族和民族以及偏好的语言。解决不平等问题需要识别这些问题并激励公平。
我们应用一种首先在医疗保险优势计划中实施的方法,按种族和民族[亚裔美国人和夏威夷原住民或太平洋岛民(AA和NHPI)、黑人、西班牙裔与白人]以及语言偏好(偏好英语与偏好其他语言)来衡量患者体验的公平性。我们确定提供高质量公平医疗服务的医院的特征。
我们使用2016 - 2019年医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估(HCAHPS)调查数据,估计、标准化并将绩效指标合并为健康公平总结得分(HESS)。HCAHPS HESS考虑了当前的横断面绩效、医院内部的改善情况以及按种族和民族以及语言偏好的总体改善情况。
共有3333家拥有2019年HCAHPS星级评级的美国医院。
44%的医院可计算出HCAHPS HESS。高分(1星到5星评级中为4 - 5星)医院往往比中等评分的医院规模小[3星(高分医院中有14%床位少于100张,而中等评分医院为7%,P <0.001),且营利性医院的比例更低(20%对31%,P <0.001)]。虽然高分医院服务的患者中有很大比例(29%)是AA和NHPI、黑人或西班牙裔,9%偏好其他语言,但高分医院中黑人及西班牙裔患者的比例低于其他医院。HESS绩效与偏好非英语语言的患者比例呈负相关。HESS得分与总体星级评级中度相关(r =0.70)。
HCAHPS HESS以及高分医院的做法可促进更公平的患者体验。