Suppr超能文献

新型酶联免疫斑点分析检测方法的自动化:使用手动密度梯度细胞分离与 T 细胞试剂盒自动化阳性选择进行 T-SPOT.试验的可比诊断性能。

Novel Automation of an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Spot Assay Testing Method: Comparable Diagnostic Performance of the T-SPOT. Test Using Manual Density Gradient Cell Isolation versus Automated Positive Selection with the T-Cell Kit.

机构信息

The Ohio State Universitygrid.261331.4, College of Medicine, Internal Medicine Department, Infectious Diseases Division, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

The Ohio State Universitygrid.261331.4, College of Medicine, Department of Microbiology Infection and Immunity, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Sep 21;60(9):e0055122. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00551-22. Epub 2022 Aug 30.

Abstract

The diagnosis of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI) is critical to improve TB treatment and control, and the T-SPOT. test is a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay used for this purpose. The objective of the study was to increase automation and extend the time between blood collection and processing for the T-SPOT. test from 0 to 8 h to 0 to 54 h. The previous maximum time between blood collection and processing for the T-SPOT. test is 32 h using T-Cell . For this, we compared the T-SPOT. test using manual peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) isolation by density gradient separation at 0 to 8 h (reference method, control arm) to an automated PBMC isolation method using magnetic beads (T-Cell kit) at 0 to 55 h postcollection. A total of 620 subjects were enrolled from 4 study sites, and blood samples were collected from each volunteer, comprising 1,850 paired samples in total. Overall agreement between both methods was 96.8% (confidence interval [CI], 95.9 to 97.6%), with 95.8% (CI, 93.5 to 97.5%) positive and 97.1% negative agreement (CI, 96.1 to 97.9%). In summary, there was a strong overall agreement between the automated and manual T-SPOT. test processing methods. The results suggest that the T-SPOT. test can be processed using automated positive selection with magnetic beads using T-Cell to decrease hands-on time. Also, this cell isolation method allowed for the time between blood collection and processing to range from 0 to 55 h. Additional studies in larger and diverse patient populations including immunocompromised and pediatric patients are needed.

摘要

对潜伏性结核(TB)感染(LTBI)的诊断对于改善结核病治疗和控制至关重要,T-SPOT. 测试是一种用于此目的的商业酶联免疫斑点检测。本研究的目的是增加自动化程度,并将 T-SPOT. 测试从 0 至 8 小时至 0 至 54 小时之间的采血和处理时间延长。之前 T-SPOT. 测试的最长采血和处理时间为 32 小时,使用 T 细胞。为此,我们比较了在 0 至 8 小时(参考方法,对照组)使用手动外周血单核细胞(PBMC)通过密度梯度分离进行 T-SPOT. 测试,与在采集后 0 至 55 小时使用磁性珠(T 细胞试剂盒)进行自动 PBMC 分离的方法。总共从 4 个研究地点招募了 620 名受试者,从每个志愿者采集血液样本,总共采集了 1850 对样本。两种方法之间的总一致性为 96.8%(置信区间 [CI],95.9 至 97.6%),阳性一致性为 95.8%(CI,93.5 至 97.5%),阴性一致性为 97.1%(CI,96.1 至 97.9%)。总之,两种自动化和手动 T-SPOT. 测试处理方法之间存在很强的总体一致性。结果表明,T-SPOT. 测试可以使用 T 细胞中的磁性珠进行自动阳性选择来处理,以减少手工操作时间。此外,这种细胞分离方法允许采血和处理之间的时间从 0 至 55 小时不等。还需要在更大和更多样化的患者人群(包括免疫功能低下和儿科患者)中进行更多研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9848/9491199/db9d0ed6e51f/jcm.00551-22-f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验