Dept. of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopaedics Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Istituto Clinico Ortopedico Traumatologico (ICOT), Latina, Italy.
Dept. of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
J Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Aug 30;23(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s10195-022-00663-6.
Literature lacks data on correlations between epidemiology and clinical data of patients with distal radius fractures (DRFs).
The aim of this study was to present a detailed epidemiologic survey of a large consecutive series of patient with DRFs.
This retrospective study included 827 consecutive patients (579 females, 248 men) who sustained a DRFs in the last 5 years. All fractures were radiographically evaluated. DRFs were classified according to Association of Osteosynthesis classification. Data on age, gender, side, period in which fracture occurred, and fracture mechanism were collected. Statistical analysis was performed.
The patients' mean age was 60.23 [standard deviation (SD) 16.65] years, with the left side being most frequently involved (56.1%). The mean age of females at the time of fracture was significantly higher than that of males. The most frequent pattern of fracture was the complete articular fracture (64.3%), while the most represented fracture type was 2R3A2.2 (21.5%). Regarding the period in which the fracture occurred, 305 DRFs (37.5%) were observed in the warmer months and 272 (33.4%) in the colder months. Low-energy trauma occurring outside home was found to be the major cause of DRF throughout the year. In both genders, trauma mechanism 2 was more frequent (59.4% F; 31.9% M; p < 0.01). A bimodal distribution of fracture mechanisms was found in males when considering the patient's age with a high-energy mechanism of fracture (3 and 4), identified in 21% (n = 52) of males aged 18-45 years, and a low-energy mechanism (1 and 2) was observed in 39.9% (n = 99) of males aged > 45 years. A significant correlation between all trauma mechanisms (from 1 to 6) and different fracture patterns (complete, partial, and extraarticular) was found (p value < 0.001). The mean age of patients with extraarticular fractures (mean age 61.75 years; SD 18.18 years) was higher than that of those with complete (mean age 59.84 years; SD 15.67 years) and partial fractures (mean age 55.26 years; SD 18.31 years). Furthermore, considering different fracture patterns and patient age groups, a statistically significant difference was found (p < 0.001).
DRFs have a higher prevalence in females, an increase in incidence with older age, and no seasonal predisposition. Low-energy trauma occurring at home is the main cause of fracture among younger males sustaining fractures after sports trauma; Complete articular is the most frequent fracture pattern, while 2R3A2.2 is most frequent fracture type.
Level IV; case series; descriptive epidemiology study.
文献中缺乏关于桡骨远端骨折(DRF)患者的流行病学与临床数据之间相关性的资料。
本研究旨在对大量连续的 DRF 患者进行详细的流行病学调查。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了过去 5 年内 827 例连续的 DRF 患者(女性 579 例,男性 248 例)。所有骨折均经影像学评估。根据骨外科学协会(AO)分类对 DRF 进行分类。收集患者的年龄、性别、侧别、骨折发生时间以及骨折机制等数据。并进行统计学分析。
患者的平均年龄为 60.23 岁(标准差 16.65 岁),左侧最常受累(56.1%)。女性骨折时的平均年龄显著高于男性。最常见的骨折类型是完全关节内骨折(64.3%),而最常见的骨折类型是 2R3A2.2(21.5%)。关于骨折发生的时间,305 例 DRF(37.5%)发生在温暖月份,272 例(33.4%)发生在寒冷月份。全年均以外伤导致的低能量损伤为主要原因。在男女患者中,创伤机制 2 更为常见(女性:59.4%;男性:31.9%;p<0.01)。当考虑患者年龄时,男性的骨折机制呈双峰分布,18-45 岁的男性中高能量机制(机制 3 和机制 4)占 21%(n=52),45 岁以上的男性中低能量机制(机制 1 和机制 2)占 39.9%(n=99)。所有创伤机制(1-6)与不同的骨折类型(完全、部分和关节外)之间存在显著相关性(p 值<0.001)。关节外骨折患者的平均年龄(61.75 岁;标准差 18.18 岁)高于完全关节内骨折患者(59.84 岁;标准差 15.67 岁)和部分关节内骨折患者(55.26 岁;标准差 18.31 岁)。此外,在考虑不同的骨折类型和患者年龄组时,差异具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。
DRF 在女性中更为常见,发病率随年龄增长而增加,无季节性倾向。在家中发生的低能量损伤是年轻男性发生骨折的主要原因,尤其是在运动创伤后;完全关节内骨折是最常见的骨折类型,而 2R3A2.2 是最常见的骨折类型。
IV 级;病例系列;描述性流行病学研究。