University of Michigan School of Social Work, 1080 South University Avenue, MI, 48109, Ann Arbor, USA.
Michigan Medicine Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Program, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Nov;30(11):8625-8636. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07337-3. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of CBT for individuals diagnosed with cancer across a broad range of outcome domains, i.e., functional health, psychological health, health behaviors, social relational, and general wellness.
A comprehensive search of 7 databases, 91 published reviews, and 4 professional websites was performed on August 30th, 2021. English-language clinical trials of CBT for cancer patients/survivors were included. Studies were independently screened, and data were extracted by 2 reviewers, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus among the investigative team. A total of 151 clinical trials (154 articles) published between 1986 and 2021 were included in the analysis.
CBT was overall effective for cancer patients/survivors in the domains of functional health, g = 0.931, p < 0.001, psychological health, g = 0.379, p < 0.001, and general wellness, g = 0.257, p < 0.001, but ineffective in domains of health behaviors, g = 0.792, p > 0.05, and social relational outcomes, g = 0.319, p > 0.05. Additional subgroup and moderator analyses further revealed CBT's differential treatment effect for different within domain outcomes, across different cancer disease stages, and CBT delivery format.
Findings of the study showed that CBT is an effective treatment for individuals diagnosed with cancer. However, treatment effects differ by important disease- and intervention-related factors, which should be considered when recommending CBT for cancer patients/survivors.
系统评价和荟萃分析认知行为疗法(CBT)对广泛的结局领域(即功能健康、心理健康、健康行为、社会关系和整体健康)诊断为癌症的个体的疗效。
于 2021 年 8 月 30 日,对 7 个数据库、91 篇已发表的综述和 4 个专业网站进行了全面检索,纳入了针对癌症患者/幸存者的 CBT 的英语临床研究。研究由 2 名评审员独立筛选,数据由 2 名评审员提取,由调查团队的共识解决差异。共有 151 项临床研究(154 篇文章)发表于 1986 年至 2021 年期间,被纳入分析。
总体而言,CBT 对癌症患者/幸存者在功能健康(g=0.931,p<0.001)、心理健康(g=0.379,p<0.001)和整体健康(g=0.257,p<0.001)领域有效,但在健康行为(g=0.792,p>0.05)和社会关系结局(g=0.319,p>0.05)领域无效。进一步的亚组和调节因素分析进一步揭示了 CBT 在不同的领域结局、不同的癌症疾病阶段和 CBT 实施形式上的治疗效果差异。
研究结果表明,CBT 是一种有效的治疗方法,适用于诊断为癌症的个体。然而,治疗效果因重要的疾病和干预相关因素而异,在向癌症患者/幸存者推荐 CBT 时应考虑这些因素。