• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

咽喉反流症状和体征在临床实践中的敏感性、特异性和预测值。

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms and Signs in Clinical Practice.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), Paris, France.

Department of Otolaryngology, Polyclinic of Poitiers, Elsan Hospital, Poitiers, France.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jul;169(1):97-104. doi: 10.1177/01945998221121822. Epub 2023 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1177/01945998221121822
PMID:36040820
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of symptoms and signs of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective controlled.

SETTING

University medical center.

METHODS

Patients presenting with LPR symptoms and signs were consecutively included after diagnosis confirmation through 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring. Healthy individuals were recruited to compose a control group. Symptoms and signs were evaluated with the reflux symptom score and reflux sign assessment. The SE, SP, PPV, and NPV of symptoms and signs were assessed.

RESULTS

The study included 403 patients with LPR and 144 healthy individuals. Throat clearing, globus sensation, heartburn, and excess throat mucus were symptoms with the highest SE (67.5%-69.7%), SP (12.5%-20.8%), and NPV (48.3%-49.2%). The combination of throat clearing, heartburn, globus sensation, and excess throat mucus led to a high SE (96.0%) and NPV (85.2%). Anterior pillar erythema, tongue tonsil hypertrophy, and posterior commissure hypertrophy resulted in the highest SE (75.5%-83.5%). The highest SP was found for uvula erythema/edema, epiglottis erythema, and interarytenoid granulatory tissue (97.1%-97.2%). The association of nonendoscopic signs (anterior pillar erythema, uvula erythema/edema, and coated tongue) had an SE and SP of 80.1% and 47.2%, respectively. The association of throat clearing, heartburn, globus, anterior pillar erythema, and uvula erythema/edema had the highest SE (98.8%), SP (33.3%), PPV (94.3%), and NPV (70.6%).

CONCLUSION

LPR symptoms and signs reported low SP and NPV. The SE, SP, PPV, and NPV may be maximized with the association of throat clearing, heartburn, globus sensation, anterior pillar erythema, and uvula erythema/edema.

摘要

目的

研究喉咽反流(LPR)症状和体征的敏感性(SE)、特异性(SP)、阳性和阴性预测值(PPV 和 NPV)。

研究设计

前瞻性对照。

设置

大学医学中心。

方法

通过 24 小时下咽食管多通道腔内阻抗-pH 监测确诊 LPR 症状和体征后,连续纳入出现 LPR 症状和体征的患者。招募健康个体组成对照组。采用反流症状评分和反流体征评估来评估症状和体征。评估症状和体征的 SE、SP、PPV 和 NPV。

结果

本研究纳入了 403 例 LPR 患者和 144 名健康个体。清嗓、异物感、烧心和咽喉部黏液过多是 SE(67.5%-69.7%)、SP(12.5%-20.8%)和 NPV(48.3%-49.2%)最高的症状。清嗓、烧心、异物感和咽喉部黏液过多的联合应用可获得较高的 SE(96.0%)和 NPV(85.2%)。前柱红斑、舌扁桃体肥大和后连合肥大导致 SE 最高(75.5%-83.5%)。悬雍垂红斑/水肿、会厌红斑和杓间区肉芽组织的 SP 最高(97.1%-97.2%)。非内镜下体征(前柱红斑、悬雍垂红斑/水肿和舌苔)联合应用的 SE 和 SP 分别为 80.1%和 47.2%。清嗓、烧心、异物感、前柱红斑和悬雍垂红斑/水肿的联合应用具有最高的 SE(98.8%)、SP(33.3%)、PPV(94.3%)和 NPV(70.6%)。

结论

LPR 症状和体征的 SP 和 NPV 较低。通过清嗓、烧心、异物感、前柱红斑和悬雍垂红斑/水肿的联合应用,可以最大限度地提高 SE、SP、PPV 和 NPV。

相似文献

1
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms and Signs in Clinical Practice.咽喉反流症状和体征在临床实践中的敏感性、特异性和预测值。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jul;169(1):97-104. doi: 10.1177/01945998221121822. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
2
Do Otolaryngologists Over- or Underestimate Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms and Findings in Clinical Practice? A Comparison Study between the True Prevalence and the Otolaryngologist-Estimated Prevalence of Symptoms and Findings.在临床实践中,耳鼻喉科医生对喉咽反流症状和体征的评估是高估还是低估了?症状和体征的实际患病率与耳鼻喉科医生估计患病率的比较研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 1;11(17):5192. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175192.
3
How many cases of laryngopharyngeal reflux suspected by laryngoscopy are gastroesophageal reflux disease-related?经喉镜检查怀疑的咽反流病例中有多少与胃食管反流病有关?
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 28;18(32):4363-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4363.
4
Correlation of pH probe-measured laryngopharyngeal reflux with symptoms and signs of reflux laryngitis.pH探头测量的喉咽反流与反流性喉炎症状和体征的相关性。
Laryngoscope. 2002 Dec;112(12):2192-5. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200212000-00013.
5
Dual pH with Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance Testing in the Evaluation of Subjective Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms.双pH值联合多通道腔内阻抗测试在主观喉咽反流症状评估中的应用
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec;155(6):1014-1020. doi: 10.1177/0194599816665819. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
6
Saliva pepsin measurements in the detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients: a cohort study.唾液胃蛋白酶检测在喉咽反流患者胃食管反流病中的诊断价值:一项队列研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Aug;280(8):3765-3771. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08000-1. Epub 2023 May 4.
7
Symptoms classically attributed to laryngopharyngeal reflux correlate poorly with pharyngeal reflux events on multichannel intraluminal impedance testing.传统上归因于喉咽反流的症状与多通道腔内阻抗测试中的咽反流事件相关性较差。
Dis Esophagus. 2022 Dec 31;36(1). doi: 10.1093/dote/doac041.
8
Assessment and Diagnostic Accuracy Evaluation of the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) Scale: Psychometric Properties using Optimal Scaling Techniques.反流症状指数(RSI)量表的评估与诊断准确性评价:运用最优尺度技术的心理测量特性
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020 Oct;129(10):1020-1029. doi: 10.1177/0003489420930034. Epub 2020 May 29.
9
Variability and accuracy of multiple saliva pepsin measurements in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients.喉咽反流患者多次唾液胃蛋白酶测量的可变性和准确性。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Oct 4;52(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s40463-023-00670-5.
10
Usefulness of pepsin saliva measurement for the detection of primary burning mouth syndrome related to reflux.唾液胃蛋白酶检测用于原发性灼口综合征与反流相关性检测的价值。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb;281(2):827-833. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08317-x. Epub 2023 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Value of Fasting and Bedtime Saliva Pepsin Measurements in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.空腹及睡前唾液胃蛋白酶检测在喉咽反流中的诊断价值
Biomedicines. 2024 Feb 8;12(2):398. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12020398.
2
Do Otolaryngologists Over- or Underestimate Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms and Findings in Clinical Practice? A Comparison Study between the True Prevalence and the Otolaryngologist-Estimated Prevalence of Symptoms and Findings.在临床实践中,耳鼻喉科医生对喉咽反流症状和体征的评估是高估还是低估了?症状和体征的实际患病率与耳鼻喉科医生估计患病率的比较研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 1;11(17):5192. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175192.