Department of Psychology, Stanford University.
Department of Sociology, Stanford University.
Psychol Sci. 2022 Sep;33(9):1557-1573. doi: 10.1177/09567976221098594. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
In polarized political environments, partisans tend to deploy empathy parochially, furthering division. We propose that belief in the usefulness of cross-partisan empathy-striving to understand other people with whom one disagrees politically-promotes out-group empathy and has powerful ramifications for both intra- and interpersonal processes. Across four studies (total = 4,748), we examined these predictions in online and college samples using surveys, social-network analysis, preregistered experiments, and natural-language processing. Believing that cross-partisan empathy is useful is associated with less partisan division and politically diverse friendship networks (Studies 1 and 2). When prompted to believe that empathy is a political resource-versus a political weakness-people become less affectively polarized (Study 3) and communicate in ways that decrease out-partisans' animosity and attitudinal polarization (Study 4). These findings demonstrate that belief in cross-partisan empathy impacts not only individuals' own attitudes and behaviors but also the attitudes of those they communicate with.
在两极分化的政治环境中,党派人士往往会狭隘地运用同理心,从而加剧分歧。我们提出,相信跨党派同理心努力理解与自己意见不合的人是有用的,这有助于增强对群体外人士的同理心,并对个人和人际过程都产生深远的影响。通过四项研究(共 4748 人),我们使用问卷调查、社交网络分析、预先注册实验和自然语言处理等方法,在在线和大学生样本中检验了这些预测。研究 1 和 2 表明,相信跨党派同理心是有用的,与较少的党派分裂和政治上多样化的友谊网络有关。当被提示相信同理心是一种政治资源而不是政治弱点时,人们在情感上的极化程度会降低(研究 3),并且以减少对方敌意和态度极化的方式进行交流(研究 4)。这些发现表明,对跨党派同理心的信念不仅影响个人自己的态度和行为,也影响他们与之交流的人的态度。