Santos Luiza A, Voelkel Jan G, Willer Robb, Zaki Jamil
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Department of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Oct 15;3(10):pgae394. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae394. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Undemocratic practices, such as voter suppression and election interference, threaten democracies worldwide. Across four studies ( = 4,350), we find that informational and motivational factors drive Americans' support for such practices. Partisans drastically overestimate how much opponents support undemocratic practices, which decreases people's willingness to defend democracy themselves (S1-S2). One remedy for this dynamic is to inform people about the extent to which their rivals actually support democracy, but in polarized contexts, people are incurious about the true beliefs of outpartisans. To address this, we test a new method for improving democratic attitudes-changing beliefs about cross-party empathy. Empathizing across disagreements can improve connections and boost persuasion. When people learn about these valued consequences of empathic engagement, their curiosity about outpartisans increases (S3), and they choose to learn about opponents' support for democracy, which reduces their own support for undemocratic practices and politicians (S4). Our findings suggest that fostering support for democracy requires not just informational strategies but also motivational ones. The power of our combined approach comes in that-instead of presenting people with information about outpartisans-it induces them to seek out that information themselves. Together, these results highlight how cross-party empathy beliefs can increase people's curiosity about those they disagree with and disrupt processes of political escalation.
诸如压制选民和干涉选举等不民主行为,威胁着全球的民主制度。在四项研究(N = 4350)中,我们发现信息和动机因素推动了美国人对这类行为的支持。党派人士大幅高估了对手对不民主行为的支持程度,这降低了人们自己捍卫民主的意愿(研究1-研究2)。针对这种情况的一种补救办法是让人们了解对手实际支持民主的程度,但在两极分化的环境中,人们对党外人士的真实信念并不感兴趣。为了解决这个问题,我们测试了一种改善民主态度的新方法——改变关于跨党派同理心的信念。跨越分歧产生同理心可以改善人际关系并增强说服力。当人们了解到这种同理参与的重要结果时,他们对党外人士的好奇心就会增加(研究3),并且他们会选择去了解对手对民主的支持情况,这会减少他们自己对不民主行为和政客的支持(研究4)。我们的研究结果表明,促进对民主的支持不仅需要信息策略,还需要动机策略。我们这种综合方法的力量在于——不是向人们提供关于党外人士的信息——而是促使他们自己去寻找这些信息。总之,这些结果凸显了跨党派同理心信念如何能够增加人们对持不同意见者的好奇心,并打破政治升级的进程。