Shriners Hospitals for Children, Salt Lake City, USA; University of Utah, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, USA.
Shriners Hospitals for Children, Salt Lake City, USA; University of Utah, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, USA.
Gait Posture. 2022 Oct;98:34-38. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.08.011. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
There is no current consensus on how to differentiate between hereditary spastic paraplegia and spastic cerebral palsy on the basis of clinical presentation. Several previous studies have investigated differences in kinematic parameters obtained from clinical gait analysis. None have attempted to combine multiple gait and physical exam measures to discriminate between these two diagnoses. This study aims to investigate the ability of a machine learning approach using data from clinical gait analysis to differentiate these cohorts.
A retrospective analysis of a gait database compiled a dataset of 179 gait and physical exam variables from 28 individuals (62 analyses) diagnosed with hereditary spastic paraplegia and 678 (1504 analyses) with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy. This data was used in a Bayesian additive regression tree (BART) analysis classified by medical record diagnosis. A 10-fold cross validation generated probabilistic distribution that each analysis was from an individual carrying the hereditary spastic paraplegia diagnosis. A diagnostic probability cutoff threshold balanced type I and type II errors. Predicted versus actual diagnoses were classified into a contingency table.
The algorithm was able to correctly classify the two diagnoses with 91% specificity and 90% sensitivity.
A machine learning approach using data from clinical gait analysis was able to distinguish participants with hereditary spastic paraplegia from those with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy with high specificity and sensitivity. This algorithm can be used to assess if individuals seen for gait disorders who do not yet have a definitive diagnosis have characteristics associated with hereditary spastic paraplegia. The results of the model inform the decision to suggest genetic testing to either confirm or refute the diagnosis of hereditary spastic paraplegia.
目前,基于临床表现,尚无共识可区分遗传性痉挛性截瘫和痉挛性脑瘫。之前的几项研究已经研究了从临床步态分析中获得的运动学参数之间的差异。没有研究尝试将多种步态和体格检查措施结合起来以区分这两种诊断。本研究旨在使用临床步态分析中的数据来调查机器学习方法区分这些队列的能力。
对步态数据库进行回顾性分析,从 28 名遗传性痉挛性截瘫患者(62 次分析)和 678 名双侧痉挛性脑瘫患者(1504 次分析)的数据库中得出 179 项步态和体格检查变量的数据集。该数据用于基于病历诊断的贝叶斯加法回归树(BART)分析。十折交叉验证生成了概率分布,每个分析均来自携带遗传性痉挛性截瘫诊断的个体。诊断概率截止阈值平衡了 I 型和 II 型错误。预测与实际诊断被分类为列联表。
该算法能够正确地将两种诊断分类,特异性为 91%,敏感性为 90%。
使用临床步态分析数据的机器学习方法能够以高特异性和敏感性区分遗传性痉挛性截瘫患者和双侧痉挛性脑瘫患者。该算法可用于评估那些因步态障碍就诊但尚未明确诊断的患者是否具有与遗传性痉挛性截瘫相关的特征。该模型的结果有助于决定是否建议进行基因检测以确认或排除遗传性痉挛性截瘫的诊断。