• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑瘫、特发性足尖行走和遗传性痉挛性截瘫患儿步态分类中运动学和动力学数据的熵、不可逆性及时间序列深度学习

Entropy, Irreversibility, and Time-Series Deep Learning of Kinematic and Kinetic Data for Gait Classification in Children with Cerebral Palsy, Idiopathic Toe Walking, and Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia.

作者信息

de Gorostegui Alfonso, Zanin Massimiliano, Martín-Gonzalo Juan-Andrés, López-López Javier, Gómez-Andrés David, Kiernan Damien, Rausell Estrella

机构信息

PhD Program in Neuroscience, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid-Cajal Institute, 28029 Madrid, Spain.

Department of Anatomy, Histology & Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), 28029 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jul 7;25(13):4235. doi: 10.3390/s25134235.

DOI:10.3390/s25134235
PMID:40648490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12252522/
Abstract

The use of gait analysis to differentiate among paediatric populations with neurological and developmental conditions such as idiopathic toe walking (ITW), cerebral palsy (CP), and hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) remains challenging due to the insufficient precision of current diagnostic approaches, leading in some cases to misdiagnosis. Existing methods often isolate the analysis of gait variables, overlooking the whole complexity of biomechanical patterns and variations in motor control strategies. While previous studies have explored the use of statistical physics principles for the analysis of impaired gait patterns, gaps remain in integrating both kinematic and kinetic information or benchmarking these approaches against Deep Learning models. This study evaluates the robustness of statistical physics metrics in differentiating between normal and abnormal gait patterns and quantifies how the data source affects model performance. The analysis was conducted using gait data sets from two research institutions in Madrid and Dublin, with a total of 81 children with ITW, 300 with CP, 20 with HSP, and 127 typically developing children as controls. From each kinematic and kinetic time series, Shannon's entropy, permutation entropy, weighted permutation entropy, and time irreversibility metrics were derived and used with Random Forest models. The classification accuracy of these features was compared to a ResNet Deep Learning model. Further analyses explored the effects of inter-laboratory comparisons and the spatiotemporal resolution of time series on classification performance and evaluated the impact of age and walking speed with linear mixed models. The results revealed that statistical physics metrics were able to differentiate among impaired gait patterns, achieving classification scores comparable to ResNet. The effects of walking speed and age on gait predictability and temporal organisation were observed as disease-specific patterns. However, performance differences across laboratories limit the generalisation of the trained models. These findings highlight the value of statistical physics metrics in the classification of children with different toe walking conditions and point towards the need of multimetric integration to improve diagnostic accuracy and gain a more comprehensive understanding of gait disorders.

摘要

由于当前诊断方法的精度不足,利用步态分析来区分患有诸如特发性足尖行走(ITW)、脑瘫(CP)和遗传性痉挛性截瘫(HSP)等神经和发育疾病的儿科人群仍然具有挑战性,这在某些情况下会导致误诊。现有方法通常孤立地分析步态变量,忽略了生物力学模式的整体复杂性以及运动控制策略的变化。虽然先前的研究已经探索了使用统计物理原理来分析受损步态模式,但在整合运动学和动力学信息或将这些方法与深度学习模型进行基准测试方面仍存在差距。本研究评估了统计物理指标在区分正常和异常步态模式方面的稳健性,并量化了数据源如何影响模型性能。分析使用了来自马德里和都柏林两个研究机构的步态数据集,共有81名ITW儿童、300名CP儿童、20名HSP儿童以及127名发育正常的儿童作为对照。从每个运动学和动力学时间序列中,导出了香农熵、排列熵、加权排列熵和时间不可逆性指标,并与随机森林模型一起使用。将这些特征的分类准确率与ResNet深度学习模型进行了比较。进一步的分析探讨了实验室间比较和时间序列的时空分辨率对分类性能的影响,并使用线性混合模型评估了年龄和步行速度的影响。结果表明,统计物理指标能够区分受损的步态模式,获得与ResNet相当的分类分数。观察到步行速度和年龄对步态可预测性和时间组织的影响呈现出疾病特异性模式。然而,不同实验室之间的性能差异限制了训练模型的通用性。这些发现凸显了统计物理指标在不同足尖行走状况儿童分类中的价值,并指出需要进行多指标整合以提高诊断准确性并更全面地理解步态障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/62cd983d7ee6/sensors-25-04235-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/c832830aa622/sensors-25-04235-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/10584c3c592b/sensors-25-04235-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/11c8fc19c02a/sensors-25-04235-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/859a44c8a187/sensors-25-04235-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/535b3c2d5fd9/sensors-25-04235-g0A5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/990af7a66b67/sensors-25-04235-g0A6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/33141db4af8a/sensors-25-04235-g0A7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/1d0e952557f7/sensors-25-04235-g0A8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/9b89edc873ce/sensors-25-04235-g0A9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/91e6d6641398/sensors-25-04235-g0A10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/061c106cfb3b/sensors-25-04235-g0A11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/3e5de37b337c/sensors-25-04235-g0A12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/6d72dbb9a462/sensors-25-04235-g0A13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/0c6ac6f0e733/sensors-25-04235-g0A14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/7c423dc6c5f4/sensors-25-04235-g0A15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/615336b1e216/sensors-25-04235-g0A16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/1a20a66e756d/sensors-25-04235-g0A17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/f63d343ac268/sensors-25-04235-g0A18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/035700d58a22/sensors-25-04235-g0A19.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/43deb22d8348/sensors-25-04235-g0A20.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/3ab4289a3d74/sensors-25-04235-g0A21.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/3a249490adae/sensors-25-04235-g0A22.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/b4c4896f41ad/sensors-25-04235-g0A23.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/391817aeb076/sensors-25-04235-g0A24.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/aa1de0daa6d9/sensors-25-04235-g0A25.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/df726a5d88af/sensors-25-04235-g0A26.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/df2060f6147d/sensors-25-04235-g0A27.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/f128c0c2cfb3/sensors-25-04235-g0A28.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/28103c1d6e1a/sensors-25-04235-g0A29.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/d9178b1735a2/sensors-25-04235-g0A30.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/e9b1198a5452/sensors-25-04235-g0A31.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/8946b0ffaae9/sensors-25-04235-g0A32.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/9dd19f2a9712/sensors-25-04235-g0A33.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/23811f44e571/sensors-25-04235-g0A34.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/6c6b29461f56/sensors-25-04235-g0A35.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/7e3d0a2b1f92/sensors-25-04235-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/91c131fc82ae/sensors-25-04235-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/4d053ccfc9dd/sensors-25-04235-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/62cd983d7ee6/sensors-25-04235-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/c832830aa622/sensors-25-04235-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/10584c3c592b/sensors-25-04235-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/11c8fc19c02a/sensors-25-04235-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/859a44c8a187/sensors-25-04235-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/535b3c2d5fd9/sensors-25-04235-g0A5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/990af7a66b67/sensors-25-04235-g0A6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/33141db4af8a/sensors-25-04235-g0A7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/1d0e952557f7/sensors-25-04235-g0A8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/9b89edc873ce/sensors-25-04235-g0A9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/91e6d6641398/sensors-25-04235-g0A10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/061c106cfb3b/sensors-25-04235-g0A11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/3e5de37b337c/sensors-25-04235-g0A12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/6d72dbb9a462/sensors-25-04235-g0A13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/0c6ac6f0e733/sensors-25-04235-g0A14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/7c423dc6c5f4/sensors-25-04235-g0A15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/615336b1e216/sensors-25-04235-g0A16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/1a20a66e756d/sensors-25-04235-g0A17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/f63d343ac268/sensors-25-04235-g0A18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/035700d58a22/sensors-25-04235-g0A19.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/43deb22d8348/sensors-25-04235-g0A20.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/3ab4289a3d74/sensors-25-04235-g0A21.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/3a249490adae/sensors-25-04235-g0A22.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/b4c4896f41ad/sensors-25-04235-g0A23.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/391817aeb076/sensors-25-04235-g0A24.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/aa1de0daa6d9/sensors-25-04235-g0A25.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/df726a5d88af/sensors-25-04235-g0A26.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/df2060f6147d/sensors-25-04235-g0A27.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/f128c0c2cfb3/sensors-25-04235-g0A28.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/28103c1d6e1a/sensors-25-04235-g0A29.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/d9178b1735a2/sensors-25-04235-g0A30.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/e9b1198a5452/sensors-25-04235-g0A31.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/8946b0ffaae9/sensors-25-04235-g0A32.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/9dd19f2a9712/sensors-25-04235-g0A33.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/23811f44e571/sensors-25-04235-g0A34.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/6c6b29461f56/sensors-25-04235-g0A35.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/7e3d0a2b1f92/sensors-25-04235-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/91c131fc82ae/sensors-25-04235-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/4d053ccfc9dd/sensors-25-04235-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/12252522/62cd983d7ee6/sensors-25-04235-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Entropy, Irreversibility, and Time-Series Deep Learning of Kinematic and Kinetic Data for Gait Classification in Children with Cerebral Palsy, Idiopathic Toe Walking, and Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia.脑瘫、特发性足尖行走和遗传性痉挛性截瘫患儿步态分类中运动学和动力学数据的熵、不可逆性及时间序列深度学习
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jul 7;25(13):4235. doi: 10.3390/s25134235.
2
Efficacy of ankle foot orthoses types on walking in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review.踝足矫形器类型对脑瘫儿童行走功能的疗效:系统评价。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Nov;60(6):393-402. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
3
Exercise interventions for cerebral palsy.脑瘫的运动干预
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 11;6(6):CD011660. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011660.pub2.
4
Differences in gait parameters between children with achondroplasia and an age-matched control group of typically developed children in the age range of 6 to 12 years.6至12岁软骨发育不全儿童与年龄匹配的正常发育儿童对照组之间的步态参数差异。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0326184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326184. eCollection 2025.
5
Treadmill interventions with partial body weight support in children under six years of age at risk of neuromotor delay.对有神经运动发育迟缓风险的六岁以下儿童进行的带有部分体重支持的跑步机干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD009242. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009242.pub2.
6
Functional electrical stimulation of the ankle dorsiflexors during walking in spastic cerebral palsy: a systematic review.痉挛型脑瘫患者行走时对踝背屈肌进行功能性电刺激:一项系统评价
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017 Dec;59(12):1230-1236. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13501. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
7
Effectiveness of robotic exoskeletons for improving gait in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review.机器人外骨骼在改善脑瘫儿童步态中的有效性:系统评价。
Gait Posture. 2022 Oct;98:343-354. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.09.082. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
8
Gait parameters and daily physical activity for distinguishing pre-frail, frail, and non-frail older adults: A scoping review.用于区分衰弱前期、衰弱和非衰弱老年人的步态参数及日常身体活动:一项范围综述
J Nutr Health Aging. 2025 May 14;29(7):100580. doi: 10.1016/j.jnha.2025.100580.
9
Treadmill interventions with partial body weight support in children under six years of age at risk of neuromotor delay: a report of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童神经运动发育迟缓风险患儿在 6 岁以下进行部分体重支持的跑步机干预:Cochrane 系统评价和荟萃分析报告。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013 Feb;49(1):67-91.
10
Treadmill interventions in children under six years of age at risk of neuromotor delay.针对有神经运动发育迟缓风险的六岁以下儿童的跑步机干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 29;7(7):CD009242. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009242.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Algorithmic Approaches for Assessing Multiscale Irreversibility in Time Series: Review and Comparison.评估时间序列中多尺度不可逆性的算法方法:综述与比较
Entropy (Basel). 2025 Jan 25;27(2):126. doi: 10.3390/e27020126.
2
Entropy and fractal analysis of brain-related neurophysiological signals in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.阿尔茨海默病和帕金森病相关神经生理信号的熵和分形分析。
J Neural Eng. 2023 Sep 25;20(5). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/acf8fa.
3
Effect of age and speed on the step-to-step transition strategies in children.年龄和速度对儿童步间转换策略的影响。
J Biomech. 2023 Aug;157:111704. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111704. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
4
Comparison of the forward and sideways locomotor patterns in children with Cerebral Palsy.脑瘫儿童前向和侧向运动模式的比较。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 4;13(1):7286. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34369-4.
5
Dense & Attention Convolutional Neural Networks for Toe Walking Recognition.密集注意力卷积神经网络在足尖行走识别中的应用
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2023;31:2235-2245. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2023.3272362. Epub 2023 May 10.
6
Prediction on the medial knee contact force in patients with knee valgus using transfer learning approaches: Application to rehabilitation gaits.使用迁移学习方法预测膝外翻患者的膝关节内侧接触力:在康复步态中的应用。
Comput Biol Med. 2022 Nov;150:106099. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106099. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
7
Discrimination between hereditary spastic paraplegia and cerebral palsy based on gait analysis data: A machine learning approach.基于步态分析数据的遗传性痉挛性截瘫与脑瘫的鉴别:一种机器学习方法。
Gait Posture. 2022 Oct;98:34-38. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.08.011. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
8
Gait analysis under the lens of statistical physics.统计物理学视角下的步态分析
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022 Jun 18;20:3257-3267. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.06.022. eCollection 2022.
9
Explaining the differences of gait patterns between high and low-mileage runners with machine learning.运用机器学习解释高里程跑者和低里程跑者之间步态模式的差异。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 22;12(1):2981. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07054-1.
10
Kinematic and Kinetic Gait Parameters Can Distinguish between Idiopathic and Neurologic Toe-Walking.运动学和动力学步态参数可区分特发性和神经源性足尖行走。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 12;19(2):804. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020804.