• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

35 例临床折裂的双层和单层氧化锆全瓷冠的断裂分析。

Fractographic analysis of 35 clinically fractured bi-layered and monolithic zirconia crowns.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Aarstadveien 19, Bergen N-5009, Norway.

出版信息

J Dent. 2022 Oct;125:104271. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104271. Epub 2022 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104271
PMID:36041673
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrieval study was to analyze the fracture features and identify the fracture origin of zirconia-based single crowns that failed during clinical use.

METHODS

Thirty-five fractured single crowns were retrieved from dental practices (bi-layered, n = 15; monolithic, n = 20). These were analyzed according to fractographic procedures by optical and scanning electron microscopy to identify fracture patterns and fracture origins. The fracture origins were closely examined. The crown margin thickness and axial wall height were measured.

RESULTS

Three types of failure modes were observed: total fractures, marginal semilunar fractures, and incisal chippings. Most of the crowns (23) had fracture origins at the crown margin and seven of them had defects in the fracture origin area. The exact fracture origin was not possible to identify due to missing parts in four crowns. The crown wall thickness was 20% thinner and wall height 30% shorter in the fracture origin area compared to the opposite side.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings in this study show that fractography can reveal fracture origins and fracture modes of both monolithic and bi-layered dental zirconia. The findings indicate that the crown margin on the shortest axial wall is the most common fracture origin site.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Crown design factors such as material thickness at the margin, axial wall height and preparation type affects the risk of fracture. It is important to ensure that the crown margins are even and flawless.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析临床使用失败的氧化锆基单冠的断裂特征,并确定断裂起源。

方法

从牙科诊所中取出 35 个断裂的单冠(双层,n=15;整体式,n=20)。通过光学和扫描电子显微镜的断口分析程序对其进行分析,以确定断裂模式和断裂起源。仔细检查了断裂起源。测量了冠边缘厚度和轴向壁高度。

结果

观察到三种失效模式:完全断裂、边缘半月形断裂和切缘崩裂。大多数冠(23 个)的断裂起源于冠边缘,其中 7 个在断裂起源区域有缺陷。由于四个冠的部分缺失,无法确定确切的断裂起源。与另一侧相比,断裂起源区域的冠壁厚度薄了 20%,壁高短了 30%。

结论

本研究的结果表明,断口分析可以揭示整体式和双层牙科氧化锆的断裂起源和断裂模式。研究结果表明,最短轴向壁上的冠边缘是最常见的断裂起源部位。

临床意义

冠设计因素,如边缘处的材料厚度、轴向壁高度和预备类型,都会影响断裂的风险。确保冠边缘均匀无瑕疵非常重要。

相似文献

1
Fractographic analysis of 35 clinically fractured bi-layered and monolithic zirconia crowns.35 例临床折裂的双层和单层氧化锆全瓷冠的断裂分析。
J Dent. 2022 Oct;125:104271. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104271. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
2
Monolithic zirconia dental crowns. Internal fit, margin quality, fracture mode and load at fracture.整体式氧化锆牙冠。内部适合性、边缘质量、断裂模式及断裂载荷。
Dent Mater. 2017 Sep;33(9):1012-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
3
Fracture rate of 188695 lithium disilicate and zirconia ceramic restorations after up to 7.5 years of clinical service: A dental laboratory survey.长达 7.5 年临床使用后 188695 例锂硅玻璃陶瓷和氧化锆陶瓷修复体的折裂率:一项牙科实验室调查。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jun;123(6):807-810. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
4
The effect of preparation taper on the resistance to fracture of monolithic zirconia crowns.预备体锥度对整体氧化锆冠抗折裂性能的影响。
Dent Mater. 2021 Aug;37(8):e427-e434. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
5
Qualitative SEM analysis of fracture surfaces for dental ceramics and polymers broken by flexural strength testing and crown compression.采用弯曲强度测试和牙冠压缩法对牙科陶瓷和聚合物的断裂表面进行定性扫描电镜分析。
J Prosthodont. 2023 Jun;32(5):100-110. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13659. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
6
Monolithic crowns fracture analysis: The effect of material properties, cusp angle and crown thickness.整体式冠折裂分析:材料性能、牙尖角度和冠厚度的影响。
Dent Mater. 2020 Aug;36(8):1038-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.04.022. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
Translational research on clinically failed zirconia implants.临床上失败的氧化锆种植体的转化研究。
Dent Mater. 2019 Feb;35(2):368-388. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.033. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
8
Load-bearing capacity and the recommended thickness of dental monolithic zirconia single crowns.牙科全瓷氧化锆单冠的承载能力及推荐厚度
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Jul;35:93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.03.014. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
9
Fractographic features of glass-ceramic and zirconia-based dental restorations fractured during clinical function.在临床使用过程中发生断裂的玻璃陶瓷和氧化锆基牙科修复体的断口形貌特征。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2014 Jun;122(3):238-44. doi: 10.1111/eos.12127. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
10
Comparison of fracture resistance and fracture characterization of bilayered zirconia/fluorapatite and monolithic lithium disilicate all ceramic crowns.双层氧化锆/氟磷灰石全瓷冠与整块式二硅酸锂全瓷冠的抗折性及折裂特征比较
Int J Esthet Dent. 2014 Spring;9(1):98-110.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of connector size and configuration on the fracture resistance of a long-span implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed partial denture (An in vitro Study).连接体尺寸和形态对长跨度种植体支持的整体式氧化锆固定局部义齿抗折性的影响(一项体外研究)
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Aug 26;25(1):1375. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06743-3.
2
Evaluation of Internal and Marginal Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Laminates Using DLP Printing and Milling Methods.使用数字光处理(DLP)打印和铣削方法对层压板的内部和边缘精度(准确性和精密度)进行评估。
Biomimetics (Basel). 2025 Jan 20;10(1):67. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics10010067.
3
Pull-Off Forces on Implant-Supported Single Restorations by Sticky Food: An In Vitro Study.
粘性食物对种植体支持的单冠修复体的脱位力:一项体外研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Jan;36(1):40-50. doi: 10.1111/clr.14355. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
4
Initial damage and failure load of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures.氧化锆陶瓷和金属陶瓷后牙悬臂固定局部义齿的初始损伤和失效载荷。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jan 15;28(1):94. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05501-z.
5
Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Implant Crown Materials on Implant Components and Bone Stress Distribution: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.种植体冠材料对种植体部件及骨应力分布影响的比较评估:三维有限元分析
Int J Dent. 2023 Dec 14;2023:1896475. doi: 10.1155/2023/1896475. eCollection 2023.
6
Risk Factors Associated with Failure and Technical Complications of Implant-Supported Single Crowns: A Retrospective Study.种植体支持的单冠失败和技术并发症的相关风险因素:一项回顾性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 5;59(9):1603. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091603.
7
Clinical outcomes of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia vs. porcelain-veneered zirconia fixed dental prosthesis, with an additional focus on the cement type: a systematic review and meta-analysis.牙支持式整体氧化锆与烤瓷贴面氧化锆固定义齿的临床疗效,额外关注粘结剂类型:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Oct;27(10):5755-5769. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05219-4. Epub 2023 Aug 26.