• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同种植体-基台连接体的细菌渗漏:一项体外研究。

Bacterial leakage in implants with different implant-abutment connections: an in vitro study.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 2012 Apr;83(4):491-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110320. Epub 2011 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1902/jop.2011.110320
PMID:21780904
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Two-piece implants present gaps and cavities between the implant and the abutment, and these hollow spaces can act as a trap for bacteria. The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the migration of two different microbial species from the inside to the outside of the implant-abutment assembly in three different connection types.

METHODS

A total of 30 implants (10 implants per group) were used. The implants presented a screwed trilobed connection (group 1), a cemented connection (group 2), and an internal conical connection (group 3). The inner parts of five implants, per group, were inoculated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa suspension and the remaining five implants, per group, with Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. The penetration of bacteria into the surrounding solution was determined by the observation of turbidity of the broth.

RESULTS

In group 1, bacterial contamination was found in six of 10 implants. In group 2, no contaminated samples were found. In group 3, bacterial contamination was found in one implant of 10. Statistically significant differences were detected between group 1 versus group 3 (P <0.05) and between group 1 versus group 2 (P <0.01), whereas no significant differences were found when comparing group 2 versus group 3 (P >0.05).

CONCLUSION

The present study confirms previous results about the hermeticity of the cement-retained implant-abutment assembly, the very low permeability to bacteria of the conical implant-abutment connection, and the high prevalence of bacterial penetration of screw-retained implant-abutment assemblies.

摘要

背景

两件式种植体在种植体和基台之间存在间隙和空腔,这些空腔可以成为细菌的陷阱。本体外研究的目的是评估两种不同微生物从种植体-基台组件的内部迁移到外部的情况,研究了三种不同的连接类型。

方法

共使用 30 个种植体(每组 10 个种植体)。种植体具有旋入式三叶连接(第 1 组)、粘结连接(第 2 组)和内部锥形连接(第 3 组)。每组内的五个种植体内部接种铜绿假单胞菌悬浮液,其余五个种植体内部接种伴放线放线杆菌。通过观察肉汤的浊度来确定细菌穿透到周围溶液中的情况。

结果

在第 1 组中,发现 10 个种植体中有 6 个受到细菌污染。在第 2 组中,未发现污染样本。在第 3 组中,发现 10 个种植体中有 1 个受到细菌污染。第 1 组与第 3 组(P <0.05)和第 1 组与第 2 组(P <0.01)之间存在统计学显著差异,而第 2 组与第 3 组之间无显著差异(P >0.05)。

结论

本研究证实了先前关于粘结固位种植体-基台组件的密封性、锥形种植体-基台连接对细菌的低渗透性以及螺钉固位种植体-基台组件细菌穿透率高的结果。

相似文献

1
Bacterial leakage in implants with different implant-abutment connections: an in vitro study.不同种植体-基台连接体的细菌渗漏:一项体外研究。
J Periodontol. 2012 Apr;83(4):491-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110320. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
2
An in vitro investigation concerning the bacterial leakage at implants with internal hexagon and Morse taper implant-abutment connections.一种关于内六角和莫尔斯锥度种植体-基台连接的种植体细菌渗漏的体外研究。
Implant Dent. 2012 Aug;21(4):335-9. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31825cd472.
3
Implants with internal hexagon and conical implant-abutment connections: an in vitro study of the bacterial contamination.带有内六角和锥形种植体-基台连接的种植体:细菌污染的体外研究
J Oral Implantol. 2014 Feb;40(1):30-6. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00121. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
4
Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections.骨水泥固位与螺丝固位种植体-基台连接内部的液体和微生物渗透情况。
J Periodontol. 2001 Sep;72(9):1146-50. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.72.9.1146.
5
Evaluation of resistance against bacterial microleakage of a new conical implant-abutment connection versus conventional connections: an in vitro study.新型锥形种植体-基台连接与传统连接方式的细菌微渗漏抗性评估:一项体外研究。
New Microbiol. 2016 Jan;39(1):49-56.
6
Bacterial leakage in Morse Cone internal connection implants using different torque values: an in vitro study.使用不同扭矩值的莫氏锥度内部连接种植体的细菌渗漏:一项体外研究。
Implant Dent. 2014 Apr;23(2):175-9. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000044.
7
Leakage of saliva through the implant-abutment interface: in vitro evaluation of three different implant connections under unloaded and loaded conditions.种植体-基台界面的唾液渗漏:三种不同种植体连接在非负重和负重条件下的体外评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):551-60.
8
Bacterial colonization of the implant-abutment interface using an in vitro dynamic loading model.采用体外动态加载模型研究种植体-基台界面的细菌定植。
J Periodontol. 2011 Apr;82(4):613-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100415. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
9
In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of an external-hex implant after saliva incubation.唾液孵育后体外评估外六角种植体-基台界面的细菌渗漏情况。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):782-7.
10
Microbiological evaluation of bacterial and mycotic seal in implant systems with different implant-abutment interfaces and closing torque values.不同种植体-基台界面和封闭扭矩值的种植系统中细菌和真菌密封的微生物评估。
Implant Dent. 2013 Aug;22(4):344-50. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3182943062.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the microgap and sealing capability in four implant systems with different interlockings under different tightening torques: an study.评估四种具有不同互锁结构的种植体系统在不同拧紧扭矩下的微间隙和封闭能力:一项研究。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2024 Dec;16(6):336-347. doi: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.6.336. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
2
Assessment of the Impact of Bone Quality and Abutment Configuration on the Fatigue Performance of Dental Implant Systems Using Finite Element Analysis (FEA).使用有限元分析(FEA)评估骨质量和基台配置对牙种植体系统疲劳性能的影响。
J Pers Med. 2024 Sep 28;14(10):1040. doi: 10.3390/jpm14101040.
3
Engaging vs. Non-Engaging Abutments: An In Vitro Study Evaluating Changes in Microgap and Screw Morphology.
功能性基台与非功能性基台:一项评估微间隙和螺钉形态变化的体外研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Aug 20;12(8):265. doi: 10.3390/dj12080265.
4
Micro-CT Evaluation of Microgaps at Implant-Abutment Connection.种植体-基台连接处微间隙的显微CT评估
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jun 20;16(12):4491. doi: 10.3390/ma16124491.
5
Controllable AgNPs encapsulation to construct biocompatible and antibacterial titanium implant.可控银纳米颗粒封装以构建生物相容性和抗菌性钛植入物。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Nov 30;10:1056419. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1056419. eCollection 2022.
6
The Stages and Grades of Periodontitis Are Risk Indicators for Peri-Implant Diseases-A Long-Term Retrospective Study.牙周炎的分期和分级是种植体周围疾病的风险指标——一项长期回顾性研究。
J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 15;12(10):1723. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101723.
7
Bacterial infiltration and detorque at the implant abutment morse taper interface after masticatory simulation.咀嚼模拟后种植体基台莫氏锥度界面的细菌渗透和松动。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 12;12(1):17103. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20915-z.
8
Bacterial Microleakage at the Implant-Abutment Interface: An In Vitro Study.种植体-基台界面处的细菌微渗漏:一项体外研究。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Jun 26;9(7):277. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9070277.
9
Effectiveness of Different Antimicrobial Agents on Malodor Prevention in Two-Stage Dental Implants: A Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.不同抗菌剂对两段式牙种植体防臭效果的研究:一项双盲随机临床试验
Eur J Dent. 2023 May;17(2):524-529. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1747954. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
10
Marginal Bone Loss around Implants with Internal Hexagonal and Internal Conical Connections: A 12-Month Randomized Pilot Study.具有内六角和内锥形连接的种植体周围边缘骨丢失:一项为期12个月的随机试点研究。
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 20;10(22):5427. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225427.