Duke Lemur Center Museum of Natural History, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Department of Integrative Anatomical Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
PeerJ. 2022 Aug 25;10:e13886. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13886. eCollection 2022.
Molecular phylogenetic studies that have included sirenians from the genera , , and have resolved their interrelationships but have yielded divergence age estimates that are problematically discordant. The ages of these lineage splits have profound implications for how to interpret the sirenian fossil record-including clade membership, biogeographic patterns, and correlations with Earth history events. In an effort to address these issues, here we present a total evidence phylogenetic analysis of Sirenia that includes living and fossil species and applies Bayesian tip-dating methods to estimate their interrelationships and divergence times. In addition to extant sirenians, our dataset includes 56 fossil species from 106 dated localities and numerous afrotherian outgroup taxa. Genetic, morphological, temporal, and biogeographic data are assessed simultaneously to bring all available evidence to bear on sirenian phylogeny. The resulting time-tree is then used for Bayesian geocoordinates reconstruction analysis, which models ancestral geographic areas at splits throughout the phylogeny, thereby allowing us to infer the direction and timing of dispersals. Our results suggest that Pan-Sirenia arose in North Africa during the latest Paleocene and that the Eocene evolution of stem sirenians was primarily situated in the Tethyan realm. In the late Eocene, some lineages moved into more northern European latitudes, an area that became the source region for a key trans-Atlantic dispersal towards the Caribbean and northern-adjacent west Atlantic. This event led to the phylogenetic and biogeographic founding of crown Sirenia with the Dugongidae-Trichechidae split occurring at the Eocene-Oligocene boundary (33.9 Ma), temporally coincident with the onset of dropping global sea levels and temperatures. This region became the nexus of sirenian diversification and supported taxonomically-rich dugongid communities until the earliest Pliocene. The Dugonginae-Hydrodamalinae split occurred near Florida during the early Miocene (21.2 Ma) and was followed by a west-bound dispersal that gave rise to the Pacific hydrodamalines. The late middle Miocene (~12.2 Ma) split of from all other dugongines also occurred near Florida and our analyses suggest that the Indo-Pacific distribution of modern dugongs is the result of a trans-Pacific dispersal. From at least the early Miocene, trichechid evolution was based entirely in South America, presumably within the Pebas Wetlands System. We infer that the eventual establishment of Amazon drainage into the South Atlantic allowed the dispersal of out of South America no earlier than the mid-Pliocene. Our analyses provide a new temporal and biogeographic framework for understanding major events in sirenian evolution and their possible relationships to oceanographic and climatic changes. These hypotheses can be further tested with the recovery and integration of new fossil evidence.
分子系统发育研究已经包括海牛目属、儒艮属和海牛属中的物种,这些研究解决了它们的相互关系,但得出的分歧年龄估计值存在问题。这些谱系分支的年龄对如何解释海牛目化石记录具有深远的影响,包括分支成员、生物地理模式以及与地球历史事件的相关性。为了解决这些问题,我们在此介绍了一项包含现生和化石物种的海牛目总证据系统发育分析,并应用贝叶斯尖端定年方法来估计它们的相互关系和分歧时间。除了现生海牛目动物外,我们的数据集还包括来自 106 个有日期地点的 56 个化石物种以及许多非洲兽总目外群分类单元。遗传、形态、时间和生物地理数据同时进行评估,以使所有现有证据都能应用于海牛目系统发育。由此产生的时间树随后用于贝叶斯地理坐标重建分析,该分析模型对整个系统发育过程中的分支进行了祖先地理区域的模拟,从而使我们能够推断扩散的方向和时间。我们的研究结果表明,全海牛目动物起源于晚古新世的北非,始新世的海牛目进化主要位于特提斯海域。在晚始新世,一些谱系移动到更北的欧洲纬度地区,该地区成为向加勒比海和北邻西大西洋的关键跨大西洋扩散的起源地。这一事件导致了冠海牛目的系统发育和生物地理形成,儒艮科-海牛科的分歧发生在始新世-渐新世边界(约 33.9 百万年前),与全球海平面和温度下降的开始时间同时发生。该地区成为海牛目多样化的中心,并支持分类学上丰富的儒艮科群落,直到早更新世。海牛亚科-海牛亚科的分歧发生在中新世早期(约 21.2 百万年前)佛罗里达州附近,随后发生了向西的扩散,形成了太平洋海牛亚科。晚中新世(约 12.2 百万年前)儒艮属与所有其他海牛属的分歧也发生在佛罗里达州附近,我们的分析表明,现代儒艮属在印度洋-太平洋的分布是跨太平洋扩散的结果。从中新世早期开始,海牛科的进化完全基于南美洲,大概在佩巴斯湿地系统内。我们推断,亚马逊水系进入南大西洋的最终建立使得在中新世中期(约 12.2 百万年前)之后,海牛属得以从南美洲扩散出去。我们的分析为理解海牛目进化中的主要事件及其与海洋和气候变化的可能关系提供了一个新的时间和生物地理框架。这些假说可以通过新化石证据的恢复和整合来进一步检验。