Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA 90007;
GeoSep Services, Moscow, ID 83843.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 14;118(37). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105956118.
The Santa Rosa fossil locality in eastern Perú produced the first Paleogene vertebrate fauna from the Amazon Basin, including the oldest known monkeys from South America. This diverse paleofauna was originally assigned an Eocene age based largely on the stage of evolution of the site's caviomorph rodents and marsupials. Here, we present detrital zircon dates that indicate that the maximum composite age of Santa Rosa is 29.6 ± 0.08 Ma (Lower Oligocene), although several zircons from Santa Rosa date to the Upper Oligocene. The first appearance datum for Caviomorpha in South America is purported to be the CTA-27 site in the Contamana region of Perú, which is hypothesized to be ∼41 Ma (Middle Eocene) in age. However, the presence of the same caviomorph species and/or genera at both CTA-27 and at Santa Rosa is now difficult to reconcile with a >11-My age difference. To further test the Middle Eocene age estimate for CTA-27, we ran multiple Bayesian tip-dating analyses of Caviomorpha, treating the ages of all Paleogene species from Perú as unknown. These analyses produced mean age estimates for Santa Rosa that closely approximate the maximum 29.6 ± 0.08 Ma composite date provided by detrital zircons, but predict that CTA-27 is much younger than currently thought (∼30 Ma). We conclude that the ∼41 Ma age proposed for CTA-27 is incorrect, and that there are currently no compelling Eocene records of either rodents or primates in the known fossil record of South America.
秘鲁东部的圣罗莎化石产地产出了亚马逊盆地的第一批古近纪脊椎动物群,其中包括来自南美的最古老的猴子。这个多样化的古动物群最初被赋予始新世的年龄,主要基于该地点的奇马罗形态啮齿动物和有袋动物的进化阶段。在这里,我们提供了碎屑锆石年代数据,表明圣罗莎的最大复合年龄为 29.6±0.08Ma(下渐新世),尽管圣罗莎的一些锆石年代为上渐新世。据推测,南美奇马罗形态的首次出现数据是秘鲁康塔马纳地区的 CTA-27 地点,其年龄约为 41Ma(中始新世)。然而,现在很难将 CTA-27 和圣罗莎同时存在的相同奇马罗形态物种和/或属与 11Ma 的年龄差异相协调。为了进一步检验 CTA-27 的中始新世年龄估计,我们对奇马罗形态进行了多次贝叶斯尖端定年分析,将秘鲁所有古近纪物种的年龄视为未知。这些分析为圣罗莎提供了接近碎屑锆石提供的 29.6±0.08Ma 最大复合日期的平均年龄估计,但预测 CTA-27 比目前认为的要年轻得多(约 30Ma)。我们得出结论,为 CTA-27 提出的约 41Ma 年龄是不正确的,目前在南美的已知化石记录中,没有啮齿动物或灵长类动物有说服力的始新世记录。