Suppr超能文献

机器学习预测自杀风险并不能识别没有传统风险因素的患者。

Machine Learning Prediction of Suicide Risk Does Not Identify Patients Without Traditional Risk Factors.

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.

Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 31;83(5):21m14178. doi: 10.4088/JCP.21m14178.

Abstract

To determine whether predictions of suicide risk from machine learning models identify unexpected patients or patients without medical record documentation of traditional risk factors. The study sample included 27,091,382 outpatient mental health (MH) specialty or general medical visits with a MH diagnosis for patients aged 11 years or older from January 1, 2009, to September 30, 2017. We used predicted risk scores of suicide attempt and suicide death, separately, within 90 days of visits to classify visits into risk score percentile strata. For each stratum, we calculated counts and percentages of visits with traditional risk factors, including prior self-harm diagnoses and emergency department visits or hospitalizations with MH diagnoses, in the last 3, 12, and 60 months. Risk-factor percentages increased with predicted risk scores. Among MH specialty visits, 66%, 88%, and 99% of visits with suicide attempt risk scores in the top 3 strata (respectively, 90th-95th, 95th-98th, and ≥ 98th percentiles) and 60%, 77%, and 93% of visits with suicide risk scores in the top 3 strata represented patients who had at least one traditional risk factor documented in the prior 12 months. Among general medical visits, 52%, 66%, and 90% of visits with suicide attempt risk scores in the top 3 strata and 45%, 66%, and 79% of visits with suicide risk scores in the top 3 strata represented patients who had a history of traditional risk factors in the last 12 months. Suicide risk alerts based on these machine learning models coincide with patients traditionally thought of as high-risk at their high-risk visits.

摘要

为了确定机器学习模型对自杀风险的预测是否能识别出意外的患者或没有传统风险因素记录的患者。研究样本包括 27091382 名 11 岁及以上患者在 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 9 月 30 日期间的门诊心理健康(MH)专科或一般医疗就诊,这些患者均有 MH 诊断。我们分别使用自杀未遂和自杀死亡的预测风险评分,在就诊后 90 天内将就诊分类为风险评分百分位层。对于每个层,我们计算了过去 3、12 和 60 个月内有传统风险因素(包括既往自残诊断和有 MH 诊断的急诊就诊或住院)的就诊次数和百分比。风险因素的百分比随着预测风险评分的增加而增加。在 MH 专科就诊中,自杀未遂风险评分处于前 3 层(分别为第 90-95 百分位、第 95-98 百分位和≥第 98 百分位)的就诊中,有 66%、88%和 99%,自杀风险评分处于前 3 层的就诊中,有 60%、77%和 93%的就诊患者在过去 12 个月内至少有一个传统风险因素被记录。在一般医疗就诊中,自杀未遂风险评分处于前 3 层的就诊中,有 52%、66%和 90%,自杀风险评分处于前 3 层的就诊中,有 45%、66%和 79%的就诊患者在过去 12 个月内有传统风险因素史。基于这些机器学习模型的自杀风险警报与传统上被认为在高危就诊时风险较高的患者相符。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e43/10270326/7636033497a3/nihms-1892541-f0001.jpg

相似文献

4
Using predictive analytics to improve pragmatic trial design.利用预测分析改进实用临床试验设计。
Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;17(4):394-401. doi: 10.1177/1740774520910367. Epub 2020 Mar 10.

本文引用的文献

4
Patient Feedback on the Use of Predictive Analytics for Suicide Prevention.患者对预测分析在预防自杀中的应用的反馈。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Feb 1;72(2):129-135. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000092. Epub 2020 Nov 3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验