Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.
Brain Electrophysiology Laboratory Company, Eugene Oregon.
J Neurophysiol. 2022 Oct 1;128(4):872-891. doi: 10.1152/jn.00328.2022. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
Neurophysiological mechanisms are increasingly understood to constitute the foundations of human conscious experience. These include the capacity for ongoing memory, achieved through a hierarchy of reentrant cross-laminar connections across limbic, heteromodal, unimodal, and primary cortices. The neurophysiological mechanisms of consciousness also include the capacity for volitional direction of attention to the ongoing cognitive process, through a reentrant fronto-thalamo-cortical network regulation of the inhibitory thalamic reticular nucleus. More elusive is the way that discrete objects of subjective experience, such as the color of deep blue or the sound of middle C, could be generated by neural mechanisms. Explaining such ineffable qualities of subjective experience is what Chalmers has called "the hard problem of consciousness," which has divided modern neuroscientists and philosophers alike. We propose that insight into the appearance of the hard problem can be gained through integrating classical phenomenological studies of experience with recent progress in the differential neurophysiology of consolidating explicit versus implicit memory. Although the achievement of consciousness, once it is reflected upon, becomes explicit, the underlying process of generating consciousness, through neurophysiological mechanisms, is largely implicit. Studying the neurophysiological mechanisms of adaptive implicit memory, including brain stem, limbic, and thalamic regulation of neocortical representations, may lead to a more extended phenomenological understanding of both the neurophysiological process and the subjective experience of consciousness. The process of consciousness, generating the qualia that may appear to be irreducible qualities of experience, can be understood to arise from neurophysiological mechanisms of memory. Implicit memory, organized by the lemnothalamic brain stem projections and dorsal limbic consolidation in REM sleep, supports the unconscious field and the quasi-conscious fringe of current awareness. Explicit memory, organized by the collothalamic midbrain projections and ventral limbic consolidation of NREM sleep, supports the focal objects of consciousness.
神经生理学机制越来越被理解为人类意识体验的基础。这些机制包括持续记忆的能力,这是通过边缘、异模态、单模态和初级皮质的折返层间连接的层次结构实现的。意识的神经生理学机制还包括通过折返额-丘脑-皮质网络调节抑制性丘脑网状核,将注意力有意愿地导向正在进行的认知过程的能力。更难以捉摸的是,主观体验的离散对象,如深蓝色的颜色或中央 C 的声音,如何通过神经机制产生。解释这种难以言喻的主观体验的特质是查默斯所谓的“意识的难题”,这一难题使现代神经科学家和哲学家都感到困惑。我们提出,通过将经验的经典现象学研究与巩固显性和隐性记忆的神经生理学差异的最新进展相结合,可以深入了解“意识的难题”的出现。尽管意识一旦被反思就变得显性,但通过神经生理机制产生意识的潜在过程在很大程度上是隐性的。研究适应性隐性记忆的神经生理学机制,包括脑干、边缘和丘脑对新皮质代表的调节,可能会导致对神经生理过程和意识的主观体验的更广泛的现象学理解。意识的过程,产生可能被认为是经验不可还原的特质的表象,可以被理解为源自记忆的神经生理机制。隐性记忆,由下丘脑投射和 REM 睡眠中的边缘巩固组织,支持无意识场和当前意识的准意识边缘。显性记忆,由中脑的 collothalamic 投射和 NREM 睡眠中的边缘巩固组织,支持意识的焦点对象。