College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 211106, China; SCHULICH School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 211106, China.
J Environ Manage. 2022 Nov 15;322:116053. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116053. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
A comprehensive understanding of the effect of environmental regulation policy synergy on carbon emissions is essential for the design and decision-making of the other policy combinations. In this paper, the panel data from 30 provinces in China during 2000-2019 are used as samples to investigate the heterogeneity of different policy combinations and compare the differences using a Bayesian non-parametric generalized additive quantile method. The research results imply that the environmental regulation policy synergy has a significant heterogeneous effect on carbon emissions on different levels. Specifically, the effect of environmental regulation policy synergy on carbon emissions has an inverted U-shape trend at the low quintiles, i.e., before the turning point, it shows a "green paradox" effect, and after the turning point, it shows an "emission reduction" effect. However, the effect of environmental regulation policy synergy on carbon emissions shows a significant N-shape trend at the high quintiles, i.e., before the second turning point, it shows an "emission reduction" effect, and after the second turning point, it shows a "green paradox" effect. Moreover, the effect of environmental regulation policy combinations on carbon emissions reduction has been found to vary significantly across regions.
全面了解环境规制政策协同对碳排放的影响,对于其他政策组合的设计和决策至关重要。本文利用 2000-2019 年中国 30 个省份的面板数据作为样本,采用贝叶斯非参数广义加性分位数方法,考察了不同政策组合的异质性,并进行了比较。研究结果表明,环境规制政策协同对不同水平的碳排放具有显著的异质效应。具体来说,在低五分位数水平上,环境规制政策协同对碳排放的影响呈倒 U 型趋势,即在转折点之前,表现出“绿色悖论”效应,转折点之后,表现出“减排”效应。然而,在高五分位数水平上,环境规制政策协同对碳排放的影响呈显著的 N 型趋势,即在第二个转折点之前,表现出“减排”效应,第二个转折点之后,表现出“绿色悖论”效应。此外,还发现环境规制政策组合对碳排放减排的影响在不同地区存在显著差异。