• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政府干预、结构转型与碳排放:来自中国的证据。

Government Intervention, Structural Transformation, and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China.

机构信息

School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China.

Institute of Marine Development, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 11;20(2):1343. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021343.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20021343
PMID:36674099
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9859371/
Abstract

Government intervention and structural transformation play an important role in both the economy and carbon emissions. Based on provincial panel data from China from 2003 to 2020, this paper employs econometric models to investigate the impact of government intervention and structural transformation on carbon emissions. In particular, structural transformation is divided into two indicators: The rationalization of the industrial structure and the upgrading of the industrial structure. According to the research findings, government intervention has significantly promoted carbon emissions and structural transformation has had dual effects on carbon emissions; meanwhile, the rationalization of the industrial structure has significantly increased carbon emissions, while the upgrading of the industrial structure has slowed down carbon emissions, with these findings passing the corresponding robustness test. The relationship between government intervention, structural transformation, and carbon emissions varies significantly over time and across regions. Further investigations revealed that government intervention and structural transformation have a significant impact on carbon emissions in various panel quantiles. Finally, the paper makes policy recommendations in order to provide empirical support for promoting China's high-quality economic development and achieving the "double carbon" goal.

摘要

政府干预和结构转型在经济和碳排放方面都发挥着重要作用。本文基于中国 2003 年至 2020 年的省级面板数据,运用计量经济学模型研究了政府干预和结构转型对碳排放的影响。具体而言,结构转型分为两个指标:产业结构合理化和产业结构升级。研究结果表明,政府干预显著促进了碳排放,而结构转型对碳排放具有双重影响;同时,产业结构合理化显著增加了碳排放,而产业结构升级则减缓了碳排放,这些结果通过了相应的稳健性检验。政府干预、结构转型和碳排放之间的关系在时间和地区上存在显著差异。进一步的研究表明,政府干预和结构转型对各面板分位数的碳排放有显著影响。最后,本文提出了政策建议,为促进中国经济高质量发展和实现“双碳”目标提供了经验支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9c8/9859371/48a0b6f132ef/ijerph-20-01343-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9c8/9859371/febe4b5b942b/ijerph-20-01343-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9c8/9859371/48a0b6f132ef/ijerph-20-01343-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9c8/9859371/febe4b5b942b/ijerph-20-01343-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9c8/9859371/48a0b6f132ef/ijerph-20-01343-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Government Intervention, Structural Transformation, and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China.政府干预、结构转型与碳排放:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 11;20(2):1343. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021343.
2
Have carbon emissions been reduced due to the upgrading of industrial structure? Analysis of the mediating effect based on technological innovation.由于产业结构升级,碳排放是否减少了?基于技术创新的中介效应分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(36):54890-54901. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19722-w. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
3
Fiscal decentralization, industrial structure upgrading, and carbon emissions: evidence from China.财政分权、产业结构升级与碳排放:来自中国的证据
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):39210-39222. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24971-w. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
4
How does industrial structure transformation affect carbon emissions in China: the moderating effect of financial development.产业结构转型如何影响中国的碳排放:金融发展的调节作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(9):13466-13477. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16689-y. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
5
Effects of the Digital Economy on Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China.数字经济对碳排放的影响:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 2;19(15):9450. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159450.
6
Study on the Decoupling and Interaction Effect between Industrial Structure Upgrading and Carbon Emissions under Dual Carbon Targets.双碳目标下产业结构升级与碳排放脱钩及交互效应研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 20;20(3):1945. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031945.
7
Does government intervention affect CO emission reduction effect of producer service agglomeration? Empirical analysis based on spatial Durbin model and dynamic threshold model.政府干预是否会影响生产性服务业集聚的 CO 减排效应?基于空间杜宾模型和动态门槛模型的实证分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(40):61247-61264. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20143-y. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
8
Economic Growth Targets and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China.经济增长目标与碳排放:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 30;19(13):8053. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138053.
9
Migration of manufacturing industries and transfer of carbon emissions embodied in trade: empirical evidence from China and Thailand.制造业迁移与贸易中隐含的碳排放转移:来自中国和泰国的经验证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(10):25037-25049. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14674-z. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
10
How to achieve a win-win situation between economic growth and carbon emission reduction: empirical evidence from the perspective of industrial structure upgrading.如何实现经济增长与碳排放减排的双赢:产业结构升级视角下的经验证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Dec;27(35):43829-43844. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09883-x. Epub 2020 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on the impact of digital financial inclusion and environmental regulation on industrial structure upgrading-based on spatial Durbin model analysis.数字金融包容与环境规制对产业结构升级影响的研究——基于空间杜宾模型分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 21;19(11):e0310720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310720. eCollection 2024.
2
Environmental regulation, land use efficiency and industrial structure upgrading: Test analysis based on spatial durbin model and threshold effect.环境规制、土地利用效率与产业结构升级:基于空间杜宾模型和门槛效应的检验分析
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 6;10(5):e26508. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26508. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Digital Economy Development on Carbon Emission Efficiency: A Spatial Econometric Analysis Based on Chinese Provinces and Cities.数字经济发展对碳排放效率的影响:基于中国省、市的空间计量分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 11;19(22):14838. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214838.
2
Impact on Carbon Intensity of Carbon Emission Trading-Evidence from a Pilot Program in 281 Cities in China.中国 281 个城市碳交易试点对碳强度的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 30;19(19):12483. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912483.
3
Effect of environmental regulation policy synergy on carbon emissions in China under consideration of the mediating role of industrial structure.
Analysis of Carbon Emission Projections and Reduction Potential of Resource-Dependent Urban Agglomerations from the Perspective of Multiple Scenarios-A Case Study of Hu-Bao-O-Yu Urban Agglomeration.
从多情景视角分析资源依赖型城市群的碳排放预测与减排潜力——以呼包鄂榆城市群为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;20(5):4250. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054250.
考虑到产业结构的中介作用,环境规制政策协同对中国碳排放的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Nov 15;322:116053. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116053. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
4
Economic Growth Targets and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China.经济增长目标与碳排放:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 30;19(13):8053. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138053.
5
Have carbon emissions been reduced due to the upgrading of industrial structure? Analysis of the mediating effect based on technological innovation.由于产业结构升级,碳排放是否减少了?基于技术创新的中介效应分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(36):54890-54901. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19722-w. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
6
How does industrial structure transformation affect carbon emissions in China: the moderating effect of financial development.产业结构转型如何影响中国的碳排放:金融发展的调节作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(9):13466-13477. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16689-y. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
7
The impact of cross-region industrial structure optimization on economy, carbon emissions and energy consumption: A case of the Yangtze River Delta.跨区域产业结构优化对经济、碳排放和能源消耗的影响:以长三角为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jul 15;778:146089. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146089. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
8
Government intervention, market development, and pollution emission efficiency: Evidence from China.政府干预、市场发展与污染排放效率:来自中国的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Feb 25;757:143738. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143738. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
9
Carbon emissions, the industrial structure and economic growth: Evidence from heterogeneous industries in China.碳排放、产业结构与经济增长:来自中国异质产业的证据。
Environ Pollut. 2020 Jul;262:114322. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114322. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
10
Pollution haven hypothesis of domestic trade in China: A perspective of SO emissions.中国国内贸易的污染避难所假说:以二氧化硫排放为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 May 1;663:198-205. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.287. Epub 2019 Jan 23.