Direct and Indirect Effects of Blue Light Exposure on Skin: A Review of Published Literature.

BACKGROUND

The growing use of electronic devices and other artificial light sources in recent decades has changed the pattern of exposure to blue light (400-500 nm). Although some progress has been made in the study of the biological effects of blue light on the skin, many questions in this field remain unexplored. The aim of this article was to review the currently available evidence on the deleterious effects of blue light on the skin as well as the methods and strategies designed to protect from the detrimental effects of blue light. The PubMed and ProQuest databases were searched in January 2022. Search results were supplemented by articles considered relevant by the authors.

SUMMARY

The results of in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies show that blue light produces direct and indirect effects on the skin. The most significant direct effects are the excessive generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, and hyperpigmentation. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species cause DNA damage and modulate the immune response. Indirect effects of blue light include disruption of the central circadian rhythm regulation via melatonin signaling and local circadian rhythm regulation via direct effects on skin cells. Antioxidants and sunscreens containing titanium dioxide, iron oxides, and zinc oxide can be used to protect against the detrimental effects of blue light as part of a strategy that combines daytime protection and night-time repair.

KEY MESSAGES

Blue light produces a wide variety of direct and indirect effects on the skin. As exposure to blue light from artificial sources is likely to continue to increase, this area warrants further investigation.