Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-environment and Agro-products Safety, Guangxi Colleges and Universities Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Tillage, Agricultural College, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-environment and Agro-products Safety, Guangxi Colleges and Universities Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Tillage, Agricultural College, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China; Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm Improvement and Cultivation in Cold Regions of Education Department, Daqing, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Dec 20;853:158370. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158370. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
Abundant nitrogen (N) fertilization is needed for maize (Zea mays L.) production in China because of its huge residual biomass return. However, excessive N fertilization has a negative impact on the soil ecosystem and environment, which contributes to climate change. Soil incorporation of maize residues is a well-known practice for reducing chemical N fertilization without compromising maize yield and soil fertility. Thus, residues incorporation has the capacity to minimize N fertilization uses and hence mitigate soil greenhouse gas emissions by improving plant N uptake and use efficiency. There is still a research gap regarding the effects of maize residues incorporation on maize yield, soil fertility, greenhouse gas emissions, and plant N and carbon (C) contents. Therefore, we conducted a field experiment during spring and autumn involving four different N fertilization rates (N0, N200, N250, and N300 kg N ha), with and without maize residues incorporation, to evaluate grain yield, soil fertility, plant N and C contents, and greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). Compared to N0, N fertilizer application at 300 kg N ha with residues incorporation significantly increased area-scaled global warming potential (GWP) compared to other N fertilization rates in both spring and autumn seasons, but soil nutrient contents and plant N and C contents were not statistically different from the N250 treatment. In contrast, the N recovery use efficiency (NRUE), physiological N use efficiency (PNUE), and agronomic N use efficiency (ANUE) were significantly lower in the N300 treatment than in the lower N treatment groups. Nitrous oxide (NO) and carbon dioxide (CO) fluxes, area-scaled GWP, and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) were significantly lower in the N200 treatment with straw incorporation than the N250 and N300 treatments of the traditional planting system. Thus, we concluded that N200 treatment with residues incorporation is optimal for improving grain yield, soil fertility, plant N uptake, and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions.
过量施肥是中国玉米生产所必需的,因为玉米有大量的残茬还田。然而,过量施肥会对土壤生态系统和环境产生负面影响,从而导致气候变化。将玉米残茬还田是减少化学氮肥用量而不降低玉米产量和土壤肥力的一种常用方法。因此,残茬还田可以通过提高植物对氮的吸收和利用效率来最大限度地减少氮肥的使用,并从而减少土壤温室气体排放。然而,关于玉米残茬还田对玉米产量、土壤肥力、温室气体排放以及植物氮和碳含量的影响仍存在研究空白。因此,我们在春季和秋季进行了田间试验,涉及四个不同的氮肥用量(N0、N200、N250 和 N300 kg N ha),以及是否加入玉米残茬,以评估玉米产量、土壤肥力、植物氮和碳含量以及温室气体排放(GHGs)。与 N0 相比,在春季和秋季,300 kg N ha 的氮肥用量与残茬还田相比,与其他氮肥用量相比,区域尺度的全球变暖潜势(GWP)显著增加,但土壤养分含量和植物氮碳含量与 N250 处理无显著差异。相比之下,N300 处理的氮回收利用率(NRUE)、生理氮利用效率(PNUE)和农学氮利用效率(ANUE)显著低于低氮处理组。与传统种植制度的 N250 和 N300 处理相比,N200 处理与秸秆还田相比,一氧化二氮(NO)和二氧化碳(CO)通量、区域尺度的 GWP 和温室气体强度(GHGI)显著降低。因此,我们得出结论,N200 处理与残茬还田相结合是提高玉米产量、土壤肥力、植物氮吸收和减少温室气体排放的最佳选择。