• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Does the experience of the first assistant affect organ injuries in laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign diseases?第一助手的经验是否会影响良性疾病腹腔镜子宫切除术的器官损伤?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Feb;307(2):453-458. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06745-4. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
2
Vesicoureteral Injury during Benign Hysterectomy: Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic Surgery versus Laparotomy.良性子宫切除术中的输尿管损伤:微创腹腔镜手术与剖腹手术比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep-Oct;27(6):1354-1362. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
3
National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.经阴道与腹腔镜子宫骶骨固定术时的围手术期发病率的全国性分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Feb;28(2):275-281. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 May 22.
4
The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.手术医生手术量对大子宫行微创子宫切除术的围手术期不良事件的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):490.e1-490.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
5
Advanced Training of Gynecologic Surgeons and Incidence of Intraoperative Complications after Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Study of More Than 2000 Cases at a Single Institution.妇科医师高级培训与全腹腔镜子宫切除术术中并发症发生率:单中心 2000 余例回顾性研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jul-Aug;25(5):810-815. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
6
Minimizing Risks in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Rates of Surgical Site Infection Across Subtypes of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.微创手术中的风险最小化:各种腹腔镜子宫切除术类型的手术部位感染率。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep-Oct;27(6):1370-1376.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.10.015. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
7
Assessment of surgeon and hospital volume for robot-assisted and laparoscopic benign hysterectomy in Sweden.瑞典机器人辅助和腹腔镜良性子宫切除术的外科医生和医院量评估。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Sep;100(9):1730-1739. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14166. Epub 2021 May 26.
8
Surgical outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional laparoscopic surgical systems.二维与三维腹腔镜手术系统在全腹腔镜子宫切除术中的手术效果
Fukushima J Med Sci. 2018 Apr 17;64(1):38-45. doi: 10.5387/fms.2017-22. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
9
Abdominal, multi-port and single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: eleven-year trends comparison of surgical outcomes complications of 936 cases.腹部、多端口与单端口全腹腔镜子宫切除术:936例手术结果及并发症的11年趋势比较
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;291(6):1313-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3576-y. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
10
An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy.既往腹腔镜子宫切除术经验对机器人辅助子宫切除术学习曲线影响的分析
J Robot Surg. 2013 Sep;7(3):295-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0388-6. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Using virtual reality simulation to ensure laparoscopic camera navigation skills of new surgical assistants-a validation study.
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 19. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12073-w.
2
A multidimensional learning curve analysis of totally laparoscopic ileostomy reversal using a single surgeon' s experience.基于单一外科医生经验的完全腹腔镜回肠造口还纳术的多维学习曲线分析
Front Surg. 2023 Feb 13;10:1077472. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1077472. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Making It Safe and Successful for Obese Patients.全腹腔镜子宫切除术:让肥胖患者也能安全、成功地接受手术。
JSLS. 2021 Apr-Jun;25(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00087.
2
Complications and Readmissions Associated with First Assistant Training Level Following Elective Bariatric Surgery.择期减重手术后第一助手培训级别相关的并发症和再入院。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Aug;25(8):1948-1954. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04787-0. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
3
Comparison of laparoscopic and laparotomic approach in lymphadenectomy in women with gynaecological cancer.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Feb;41(2):329-330. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2020.1716312. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
4
Impact of First Assistant Surgeon Experience on the Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Hepatectomies.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Apr;30(4):423-428. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0701. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
5
From hysteroscopy to laparoendoscopic surgery: what is the best surgical approach for symptomatic isthmocele? A systematic review and meta-analysis.从宫腔镜到腹腔镜手术:有症状的峡部憩室的最佳手术方法是什么?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jan;301(1):33-52. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05438-0. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
6
Updates and Controversies of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Surgery.妇科手术中机器人辅助手术的进展与争议
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;62(4):733-748. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000489.
7
The incidence, causes, and management of lower urinary tract injury during total laparoscopic hysterectomy.全腹腔镜子宫切除术中下尿路损伤的发生率、病因及处理
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019 Jan;48(1):45-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
8
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: how does training for surgeons in a standardized operation affect hospitals and patients?全腹腔镜子宫切除术:外科医生的标准化手术培训如何影响医院和患者?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Oct;298(4):763-771. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4869-3. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
9
Re: Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assistant's seniority has no influence on perioperative course.关于:机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:助手的资历对围手术期过程无影响。
J Robot Surg. 2018 Sep;12(3):389-390. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0836-z.
10
Laparoscopic repair of ureter damaged during laparoscopic hysterectomy: Presentation of two cases.腹腔镜子宫切除术中输尿管损伤的腹腔镜修复:两例报告。
Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;14(3):191-194. doi: 10.4274/tjod.34270. Epub 2017 Sep 30.

第一助手的经验是否会影响良性疾病腹腔镜子宫切除术的器官损伤?

Does the experience of the first assistant affect organ injuries in laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign diseases?

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, 1-40, 1-jou, 12-choume, Maeda, Teine-ku, Sapporo city, Hokkaido, 006-8555, Japan.

Department of Public Health, Hokkaido University Faculty and Graduate School of Medicine, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo city, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Feb;307(2):453-458. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06745-4. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-022-06745-4
PMID:36045193
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9918563/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study sought to explore whether the experience level of the first assistant surgeon influences perioperative organ injuries (ureteral, bladder, and intestinal injuries) in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for benign diseases. We defined an experienced surgeon as a surgeon certified by the Skill Qualification Committee of the Japan Society of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Therapy or a surgeon with equivalent surgical skills.

METHODS

We reviewed our surgical registry database of TLH for benign indications between 2014 and 2020 and only selected cases performed by an experienced primary surgeon. Patients were divided into two groups based on the experience level of the first assistant. Inverse probability of treatment weighting by propensity score, which was adjusted for patient and procedure characteristics, was used to examine differences in perioperative organ injuries according to the experience level of the first assistant.

RESULTS

Among 1682 patients who underwent TLH, 18 organ injuries were found (0.83%). In the propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting models, less experience of the first assistant had no significant impact on the occurrence of perioperative organ injuries (p = 0.348).

CONCLUSION

In TLH for benign indications at our hospital, given an experienced primary surgeon, the inclusion of a less experienced first assistant does not negatively affect the occurrence of perioperative organ injuries.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨第一助手外科医生的经验水平是否会影响因良性疾病接受全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)的患者的围手术期器官损伤(输尿管、膀胱和肠损伤)。我们将经验丰富的外科医生定义为通过日本妇科内窥镜和微创治疗技能资格委员会认证的外科医生或具有同等手术技能的外科医生。

方法

我们回顾了 2014 年至 2020 年期间我们为良性指征进行的 TLH 手术登记数据库,仅选择由经验丰富的主刀医生进行的病例。根据第一助手的经验水平,将患者分为两组。通过倾向评分的逆概率治疗加权,调整了患者和手术特征,以检查第一助手经验水平对围手术期器官损伤的差异。

结果

在 1682 例接受 TLH 的患者中,发现了 18 例器官损伤(0.83%)。在倾向评分逆概率治疗加权模型中,第一助手经验较少对围手术期器官损伤的发生没有显著影响(p=0.348)。

结论

在我们医院进行的良性指征 TLH 中,考虑到有经验的主刀医生,包括经验较少的第一助手并不会对围手术期器官损伤的发生产生负面影响。