• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

综合护理对腹部手术患者胃肠功能恢复的影响。

Effect of Comprehensive Nursing on the Recovery of Gastrointestinal Function in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Operation.

机构信息

Pediatric Surgery Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First People's Hospital, Jingmen, Hubei Province, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, The First People's Hospital, Jingmen, Hubei Province, China.

出版信息

Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Aug 21;2022:1179321. doi: 10.1155/2022/1179321. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/1179321
PMID:36045970
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9420570/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to explore the effect of comprehensive nursing on the recovery of gastrointestinal function in patients undergoing an abdominal operation.

METHODS

Sixty patients undergoing abdominal surgery in our hospital from January 2019 to April 2021 were enrolled. The patients were arbitrarily assigned into control group and research group. The former group received routine nursing and the latter group received comprehensive nursing. Nursing satisfaction, gastrointestinal function, POMS-SF score, nutrition risk score, incidence of adverse reactions, and quality of life scores were compared.

RESULTS

The nursing satisfaction of the research group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant ( < 0.05). In terms of gastrointestinal function, the anal exhaust time eating time defecation time and bowel sound recovery time in the research group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant ( < 0.05). In terms of POMS-SF score, the scores of tension-anxiety, depression-depression, fatigue-dullness, anger-hostility, and confusion-confusion in the research group were lower than those in the control group, while the energy-vitality score was higher than that in the control group, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant ( < 0.05). There was no significant difference in nutritional risk score among patients before nursing ( > 0.05); after nursing, the nutritional risk score decreased. Compared between the two groups, the nutritional risk score of the research group was lower when compared to the control group at 3 days, 5 days, and 7 days after nursing, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant ( < 0.05). In terms of the incidence of adverse reactions, the incidence of adverse reactions such as incision effusion, incision infection, incision dehiscence, and anastomotic leakage in the research group was lower when compared to the control group, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant ( < 0.05). Regarding quality of life scores, before nursing, there exhibited no significant difference of patients ( > 0.05); after nursing, the quality of life scores of patients decreased. Compared with the two groups, the physical function, psychological function, social function, and healthy self-cognition scores of the research group were all lower compared to the control group, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Abdominal surgery patients received comprehensive care, which improved their mental health, reduced anxiety and depression levels, relieved fatigue and dullness, improved energy and vitality, and enhanced their overall mood. Meanwhile, it can also promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function in patients and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff2e/9420570/894e443f2ef5/CIN2022-1179321.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff2e/9420570/f576307c5eb2/CIN2022-1179321.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff2e/9420570/894e443f2ef5/CIN2022-1179321.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff2e/9420570/f576307c5eb2/CIN2022-1179321.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff2e/9420570/894e443f2ef5/CIN2022-1179321.002.jpg
摘要

目的

探讨综合护理对腹部手术患者胃肠功能恢复的影响。

方法

选取我院 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 4 月收治的 60 例行腹部手术患者,采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组和观察组,每组 30 例。对照组给予常规护理,观察组给予综合护理。比较两组护理满意度、胃肠功能、POMS-SF 评分、营养风险评分、不良反应发生率和生活质量评分。

结果

观察组护理满意度高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。观察组肛门排气时间、进食时间、排便时间、肠鸣音恢复时间均短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。观察组紧张-焦虑、抑郁-沮丧、疲劳-迟钝、愤怒-敌意、困惑-迷茫评分均低于对照组,精力-活力评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。护理前两组患者营养风险评分比较,差异无统计学意义(>0.05);护理后营养风险评分降低,观察组 3、5、7d 营养风险评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。观察组切口积液、切口感染、切口裂开、吻合口漏等不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。护理前两组患者生活质量评分比较,差异无统计学意义(>0.05);护理后生活质量评分降低,观察组生理功能、心理功能、社会功能、健康自我认知评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。

结论

腹部手术患者接受综合护理,改善了心理健康,降低了焦虑和抑郁水平,缓解了疲劳和迟钝,提高了精力和活力,改善了整体情绪。同时,还能促进患者胃肠功能的恢复,降低不良反应的发生率。

相似文献

1
Effect of Comprehensive Nursing on the Recovery of Gastrointestinal Function in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Operation.综合护理对腹部手术患者胃肠功能恢复的影响。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Aug 21;2022:1179321. doi: 10.1155/2022/1179321. eCollection 2022.
2
Effect of Rehabilitation Nursing under the Guidance of the Health Action Process Approach Model on Perioperative Nursing Effect of Artificial Hip Arthroplasty: Effect on Promoting Quality of Life and Postoperative Rehabilitation.健康行动过程模式指导下的康复护理对人工髋关节置换术围手术期护理效果的影响:对提高生活质量和术后康复的影响。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Apr 12;2022:1247002. doi: 10.1155/2022/1247002. eCollection 2022.
3
Effects of ADOPT-Based Breathing Training Combined with Continuous Nursing on Quality of Life, Mental Health, and Self-Efficacy in Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: Based on a Retrospective Cohort Study.基于回顾性队列研究的 ADOPT 呼吸训练联合连续护理对肺癌化疗患者生活质量、心理健康和自我效能的影响。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Apr 20;2022:4164771. doi: 10.1155/2022/4164771. eCollection 2022.
4
The Effect of Narrative Nursing Intervention on Shame in Elderly Patients with Bladder Cancer after Ileal Bladder Replacement: A Cohort Study.叙事护理干预对回肠代膀胱术后老年膀胱癌患者羞耻感的影响:一项队列研究。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jun 30;2022:4299919. doi: 10.1155/2022/4299919. eCollection 2022.
5
Enhanced recovery nursing and mental health education on postoperative recovery and mental health of laparoscopic liver resection.强化康复护理及心理健康教育对腹腔镜肝切除术后恢复及心理健康的影响
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Aug 27;15(8):1728-1738. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i8.1728.
6
Application of early enteral nutrition nursing based on enhanced recovery after surgery theory in patients with digestive surgery.基于术后加速康复理论的早期肠内营养护理在消化外科患者中的应用
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Sep 27;15(9):1910-1918. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i9.1910.
7
The Clinical Value of High-Quality Nursing in Concurrent Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy after Glioma Surgery and Its Influence on the Stress Indicators Cor, ACTH, and CRP.高质量护理在脑胶质瘤术后同期放化疗中的临床价值及其对应激指标 Cor、ACTH、CRP 的影响。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Jan 25;2022:8335400. doi: 10.1155/2022/8335400. eCollection 2022.
8
Effect of Continuous Nutrition Management Intervention on Nutritional Status and Development of Premature Infants Based on Mobile Medical APP.基于移动医疗 APP 的连续营养管理干预对早产儿营养状况及发育的影响。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Aug 8;2022:8586355. doi: 10.1155/2022/8586355. eCollection 2022.
9
A Cohort Study of the Effects of Integrated Medical and Nursing Rounds Combined with AIDET Communication Mode on Recovery and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.一项综合医疗和护理查房联合 AIDET 沟通模式对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者康复和生活质量影响的队列研究。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Aug 24;2022:9489203. doi: 10.1155/2022/9489203. eCollection 2022.
10
The Role of Establishing Neurosurgical Specialist Nurse Working Group in the Recovery and Prevention of Negative Psychological Emotion after Meningioma Surgery.神经外科专科护士工作组在脑膜瘤手术后康复和预防负性心理情绪中的作用。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Jun 27;2022:7658710. doi: 10.1155/2022/7658710. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of high-quality nursing care on postoperative complications and quality of life for patients undergoing common bile duct exploration.优质护理对胆总管探查术患者术后并发症及生活质量的影响
BMC Nurs. 2025 May 13;24(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03119-4.
2
Effects of ESPCS mode nursing on the surgical tolerance, gastrointestinal tract recovery and self‑management efficacy of patients with colon cancer.ESPCS模式护理对结肠癌患者手术耐受性、胃肠道恢复及自我管理效能的影响
Oncol Lett. 2024 Apr 3;27(6):247. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14380. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Retracted: Effect of Comprehensive Nursing on the Recovery of Gastrointestinal Function in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Operation.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effect of Narrative Nursing Intervention on Shame in Elderly Patients with Bladder Cancer after Ileal Bladder Replacement: A Cohort Study.叙事护理干预对回肠代膀胱术后老年膀胱癌患者羞耻感的影响:一项队列研究。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jun 30;2022:4299919. doi: 10.1155/2022/4299919. eCollection 2022.
2
Effect of Family Participatory Nursing Model Based on WeChat Platform on Psychological Elasticity and Quality of Life of Patients with Lung Cancer.微信平台家庭参与式护理模式对肺癌患者心理弹性及生活质量的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 May 7;2022:4704107. doi: 10.1155/2022/4704107. eCollection 2022.
3
Effectiveness of Integrated Education to Reduce Postoperative Nausea, Vomiting, and Dizziness after Abdominal Surgery under General Anesthesia.
撤回:综合护理对腹部手术患者胃肠功能恢复的影响
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2023 Jul 26;2023:9840538. doi: 10.1155/2023/9840538. eCollection 2023.
综合教育对减少全麻下腹部手术后恶心、呕吐和头晕的效果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 6;18(11):6124. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116124.
4
Effect of hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm) on outcomes of abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials.透明质酸钠基生物可吸收膜(Seprafilm)对腹部手术结局的影响:随机对照试验的荟萃分析和序贯分析。
Updates Surg. 2022 Jun;74(3):865-881. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01117-0. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
5
The Impact of Prior Abdominal Surgery on Complications of Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.先前腹部手术对腹部分区自体乳房重建术后并发症的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021 Sep;37(7):566-579. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723816. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
6
The analgesic effect of bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in paediatric lower abdominal surgeries: A randomised, prospective trial.双侧超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞在小儿下腹部手术中的镇痛效果:一项随机前瞻性试验。
Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Sep;64(9):762-767. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_630_20. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
7
Technical Evidence Review for Emergency Major Abdominal Operation Conducted for the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery.美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)改善手术护理与恢复安全计划下紧急重大腹部手术的技术证据审查
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Dec;231(6):743-764.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.08.772. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
8
Magnitude of Abdominal Wound Dehiscence and Associated Factors of Patients Who Underwent Abdominal Operation at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴圣保罗医院千禧医学院接受腹部手术患者的腹部伤口裂开程度及相关因素
Surg Res Pract. 2020 Feb 23;2020:1379738. doi: 10.1155/2020/1379738. eCollection 2020.
9
Exploring perioperative complications of anterior lumber interbody fusion in patients with a history of prior abdominal surgery: A retrospective cohort study.探讨有腹部手术史患者前路腰椎间融合术围手术期并发症:一项回顾性队列研究。
Spine J. 2020 Jul;20(7):1037-1043. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
10
Flurbiprofen axetil for postoperative analgesia in upper abdominal surgery: a randomized, parallel controlled, double-blind, multicenter clinical study.氟比洛芬酯用于上腹部手术术后镇痛的随机、平行对照、双盲、多中心临床研究
Surg Today. 2020 Jul;50(7):749-756. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01951-1. Epub 2020 Jan 10.