Kuppens Peter, Dejonckheere Egon, Kalokerinos Elise K, Koval Peter
KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Affect Sci. 2022 Mar 19;3(2):505-515. doi: 10.1007/s42761-022-00101-0. eCollection 2022 Jun.
Real-world emotions are often more vivid, personally meaningful, and consequential than those evoked in the lab. Therefore, studying emotions in daily life is essential to test theories, discover new phenomena, and understand healthy emotional functioning; in short, to move affective science forward. The past decades have seen a surge of research using daily diary, experience sampling, or ecological momentary assessment methods to study emotional phenomena in daily life. In this paper, we will share some of the insights we have gained from our collective experience applying such daily life methods to study everyday affective processes. We highlight what we see as important considerations and caveats involved in using these methods and formulate recommendations to improve their use in future research. These insights focus on the importance of (i) theory and hypothesis-testing; (ii) measurement; (iii) timescale; and (iv) context, when studying emotions in their natural habitat.
现实世界中的情感往往比实验室中诱发的情感更加生动、更具个人意义且影响更大。因此,研究日常生活中的情感对于检验理论、发现新现象以及理解健康的情感功能至关重要;简而言之,就是推动情感科学向前发展。在过去几十年里,大量研究采用日记法、经验取样法或生态瞬时评估法来研究日常生活中的情感现象。在本文中,我们将分享一些从我们运用此类日常生活方法研究日常情感过程的集体经验中获得的见解。我们强调在使用这些方法时我们认为重要的考虑因素和注意事项,并提出建议以改进它们在未来研究中的应用。这些见解聚焦于在自然情境中研究情感时,(i)理论与假设检验;(ii)测量;(iii)时间尺度;以及(iv)背景的重要性。